H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Mary Pierce vs Natalia Medvedeva H2H: 3-0

Mary Pierce holds a 3–0 lead over Natalia Medvedeva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Mary Pierce leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Mary Pierce won the 1997 Australian Open second round 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mary Pierce
FRA Age 51 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
Natalia Medvedeva
UKR Age 54 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 17, 1997* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Mary Pierce #22 6-2 6-2 Natalia Medvedeva #93 Match data
Jun 30, 1996* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Mary Pierce #14 6-4 6-1 Natalia Medvedeva #119 Match data
Oct 13, 1994* Filderstadt WTA 250 R32 Hard Mary Pierce #6 6-3 6-2 Natalia Medvedeva #40 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mary Pierce #560 #3 3,797 2,137 460 215 68.1% 2 5 0 3 8 18
Natalia Medvedeva #387 #23 295 1,881 111 111 50.0% 0 0 0 1 3 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mary Pierce Natalia Medvedeva
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1989 0–3 0.0% #243 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1990 6–7 46.2% #107 1,543 0 0 1987 0–1 0.0% #197 1,499 0 0
16 1991 21–9 70.0% #26 1,786 0 1 1988 0–3 0.0% #317 1,473 0 0
17 1992 31–9 77.5% #13 1,901 0 4 1989 10–9 52.6% #67 1,614 0 0
18 1993 38–15 71.7% #12 2,003 0 5 1990 15–16 48.4% #56 1,699 0 1
19 1994 43–16 72.9% #5 2,053 0 5 1991 9–10 47.4% #83 1,683 0 1
20 1995 35–14 71.4% #5 2,008 1 7 1992 20–16 55.6% #41 1,708 0 2
21 1996 17–11 60.7% #24 1,899 1 7 1993 24–13 64.9% #23 1,870 0 4
22 1997 45–15 75.0% #7 2,053 1 8 1994 17–21 44.7% #57 1,770 0 4
23 1998 35–12 74.5% #7 2,120 1 12 1995 9–12 42.9% #79 1,694 0 4
24 1999 45–19 70.3% #5 2,053 1 13 1996 6–8 42.9% #88 1,682 0 4
25 2000 29–11 72.5% #7 2,033 2 15 1997 1–2 33.3% #388 1,661 0 4
26 2001 6–8 42.9% #129 1,839 2 15 — — — — — — —
27 2002 14–13 51.9% #52 1,752 2 15 — — — — — — —
28 2003 23–17 57.5% #33 1,786 2 15 — — — — — — —
29 2004 22–16 57.9% #29 1,754 2 16 — — — — — — —
30 2005 41–12 77.4% #5 2,119 2 18 — — — — — — —
31 2006 9–8 52.9% #79 1,967 2 18 — — — — — — —