H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Mary Pierce vs Natasha Zvereva H2H: 5-2

Mary Pierce holds a 5–2 lead over Natasha Zvereva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Mary Pierce leads 4–0 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on carpet. Most recently, Mary Pierce won the 1999 Filderstadt fourth round 7-6 5-7 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mary Pierce
FRA Age 51 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
5 – 2
7 main draw meetings
Natasha Zvereva
BLR Age 55 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 8, 1999* Filderstadt WTA 250 R16 Hard Mary Pierce #6 7-6 5-7 6-4 Natasha Zvereva #22 Match data
Aug 31, 1997* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Mary Pierce #10 7-6 6-1 Natasha Zvereva #27 Match data
Jan 27, 1995* Australian Open Grand Slam QF Hard Mary Pierce #5 6-1 6-4 Natasha Zvereva #8 Match data
Nov 12, 1994* Philadelphia WTA 1000 SF Carpet Mary Pierce #5 6-3 6-3 Natasha Zvereva #10 Match data
Apr 2, 1994* Hilton Head WTA 1000 SF Clay Natasha Zvereva #12 0-6 6-3 6-2 Mary Pierce #13 Match data
Oct 17, 1993* Filderstadt WTA 250 F Hard Mary Pierce #16 6-3 6-3 Natasha Zvereva #20 Match data
Nov 13, 1992* Philadelphia WTA 250 R16 Carpet Natasha Zvereva #23 7-6 6-2 Mary Pierce #12 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mary Pierce #560 #3 3,797 2,137 460 215 68.1% 2 5 0 3 8 18
Natasha Zvereva #201 #5 1,820 2,073 388 232 62.6% 0 0 0 2 3 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mary Pierce Natasha Zvereva
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1989 0–3 0.0% #243 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1990 6–7 46.2% #107 1,543 0 0 1986 4–2 66.7% #94 1,575 0 0
16 1991 21–9 70.0% #26 1,786 0 1 1987 21–11 65.6% #19 1,831 0 0
17 1992 31–9 77.5% #13 1,901 0 4 1988 38–17 69.1% #7 1,991 0 0
18 1993 38–15 71.7% #12 2,003 0 5 1989 23–17 57.5% #27 1,802 0 0
19 1994 43–16 72.9% #5 2,053 0 5 1990 38–15 71.7% #12 1,955 0 2
20 1995 35–14 71.4% #5 2,008 1 7 1991 29–18 61.7% #21 1,912 0 2
21 1996 17–11 60.7% #24 1,899 1 7 1992 32–19 62.7% #23 1,977 0 2
22 1997 45–15 75.0% #7 2,053 1 8 1993 37–19 66.1% #19 1,972 0 2
23 1998 35–12 74.5% #7 2,120 1 12 1994 29–12 70.7% #10 1,978 0 3
24 1999 45–19 70.3% #5 2,053 1 13 1995 31–17 64.6% #14 1,971 0 3
25 2000 29–11 72.5% #7 2,033 2 15 1996 11–12 47.8% #57 1,877 0 3
26 2001 6–8 42.9% #129 1,839 2 15 1997 25–20 55.6% #25 1,902 0 3
27 2002 14–13 51.9% #52 1,752 2 15 1998 35–21 62.5% #16 1,932 0 4
28 2003 23–17 57.5% #33 1,786 2 15 1999 24–19 55.8% #27 1,824 0 5
29 2004 22–16 57.9% #29 1,754 2 16 2000 11–12 47.8% #78 1,759 0 5
30 2005 41–12 77.4% #5 2,119 2 18 — — — — — — —
31 2006 9–8 52.9% #79 1,967 2 18 2002 0–1 0.0% — 1,733 0 5