H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Mary Pierce vs Nathalie Tauziat H2H: 2-1
Mary Pierce holds a 2–1 lead over Nathalie Tauziat in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Mary Pierce leads 1–0 on carpet, while Nathalie Tauziat leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Mary Pierce won the 1997 WTA Tour Championships semifinal 6-2 5-7 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 51
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 58
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 17, 1997 | WTA Tour Championships | WTA Finals | SF | Carpet | Mary Pierce | 6-2 5-7 6-4 | Nathalie Tauziat | Match data |
| Aug 1, 1997* | San Diego | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Mary Pierce | 6-2 6-1 | Nathalie Tauziat | Match data |
| Jun 30, 1995* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Nathalie Tauziat | 6-4 3-6 6-1 | Mary Pierce | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mary Pierce | #560 | #3 | 3,797 | 2,137 | 460 | 215 | 68.1% | 2 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 18 |
| Nathalie Tauziat | #126 | #3 | 2,562 | 2,033 | 546 | 330 | 62.3% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mary Pierce | Nathalie Tauziat | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1989 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #243 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1990 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #107 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1991 | 21–9 | 70.0% | #26 | 1,786 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #296 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1992 | 31–9 | 77.5% | #13 | 1,901 | 0 | 4 | 1985 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #112 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1993 | 38–15 | 71.7% | #12 | 2,003 | 0 | 5 | 1986 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #66 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1994 | 43–16 | 72.9% | #5 | 2,053 | 0 | 5 | 1987 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #25 | 1,845 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1995 | 35–14 | 71.4% | #5 | 2,008 | 1 | 7 | 1988 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #26 | 1,856 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1996 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #24 | 1,899 | 1 | 7 | 1989 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #25 | 1,881 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1997 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #7 | 2,053 | 1 | 8 | 1990 | 46–20 | 69.7% | #18 | 1,962 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1998 | 35–12 | 74.5% | #7 | 2,120 | 1 | 12 | 1991 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #13 | 1,970 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1999 | 45–19 | 70.3% | #5 | 2,053 | 1 | 13 | 1992 | 38–19 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,936 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2000 | 29–11 | 72.5% | #7 | 2,033 | 2 | 15 | 1993 | 41–18 | 69.5% | #18 | 1,975 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2001 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #129 | 1,839 | 2 | 15 | 1994 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #35 | 1,850 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2002 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #52 | 1,752 | 2 | 15 | 1995 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #27 | 1,846 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2003 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #33 | 1,786 | 2 | 15 | 1996 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #22 | 1,806 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2004 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #29 | 1,754 | 2 | 16 | 1997 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #11 | 1,976 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2005 | 41–12 | 77.4% | #5 | 2,119 | 2 | 18 | 1998 | 41–23 | 64.1% | #10 | 2,024 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2006 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #79 | 1,967 | 2 | 18 | 1999 | 37–23 | 61.7% | #7 | 1,987 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #10 | 1,868 | 0 | 7 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #13 | 1,863 | 0 | 8 |