H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Mary Pierce vs Nathalie Tauziat H2H: 2-1

Mary Pierce holds a 2–1 lead over Nathalie Tauziat in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Mary Pierce leads 1–0 on carpet, while Nathalie Tauziat leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Mary Pierce won the 1997 WTA Tour Championships semifinal 6-2 5-7 6-4.

FRA Age 51 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2 1
3 main draw meetings
FRA Age 58 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Nov 17, 1997 WTA Tour Championships WTA Finals SF Carpet Mary Pierce #7 6-2 5-7 6-4 Nathalie Tauziat #14 Match data
Aug 1, 1997* San Diego WTA 500 R16 Hard Mary Pierce #11 6-2 6-1 Nathalie Tauziat #21 Match data
Jun 30, 1995* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Nathalie Tauziat #20 6-4 3-6 6-1 Mary Pierce #4 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mary Pierce #560 #3 3,797 2,137 460 215 68.1% 2 5 0 3 8 18
Nathalie Tauziat #126 #3 2,562 2,033 546 330 62.3% 0 1 0 1 6 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mary Pierce Nathalie Tauziat
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1989 0–3 0.0% #243 1,480 0 0
15 1990 6–7 46.2% #107 1,543 0 0
16 1991 21–9 70.0% #26 1,786 0 1 1984 0–1 0.0% #296 1,499 0 0
17 1992 31–9 77.5% #13 1,901 0 4 1985 3–3 50.0% #112 1,539 0 0
18 1993 38–15 71.7% #12 2,003 0 5 1986 12–17 41.4% #66 1,643 0 0
19 1994 43–16 72.9% #5 2,053 0 5 1987 32–20 61.5% #25 1,845 0 0
20 1995 35–14 71.4% #5 2,008 1 7 1988 30–19 61.2% #26 1,856 0 0
21 1996 17–11 60.7% #24 1,899 1 7 1989 32–19 62.7% #25 1,881 0 0
22 1997 45–15 75.0% #7 2,053 1 8 1990 46–20 69.7% #18 1,962 0 1
23 1998 35–12 74.5% #7 2,120 1 12 1991 38–20 65.5% #13 1,970 0 1
24 1999 45–19 70.3% #5 2,053 1 13 1992 38–19 66.7% #14 1,936 0 1
25 2000 29–11 72.5% #7 2,033 2 15 1993 41–18 69.5% #18 1,975 0 2
26 2001 6–8 42.9% #129 1,839 2 15 1994 29–21 58.0% #35 1,850 0 2
27 2002 14–13 51.9% #52 1,752 2 15 1995 27–19 58.7% #27 1,846 0 3
28 2003 23–17 57.5% #33 1,786 2 15 1996 30–21 58.8% #22 1,806 0 3
29 2004 22–16 57.9% #29 1,754 2 16 1997 40–21 65.6% #11 1,976 0 4
30 2005 41–12 77.4% #5 2,119 2 18 1998 41–23 64.1% #10 2,024 0 4
31 2006 9–8 52.9% #79 1,967 2 18 1999 37–23 61.7% #7 1,987 0 6
32 2000 36–25 59.0% #10 1,868 0 7
33 2001 34–21 61.8% #13 1,863 0 8