H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Mary Pierce vs Nicole Pratt H2H: 4-0

Mary Pierce holds a 4–0 lead over Nicole Pratt in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Mary Pierce leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mary Pierce won the 2006 Australian Open first round 6-1 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mary Pierce
FRA Age 51 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main draw meetings
Nicole Pratt
AUS Age 53 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 18, 2006* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Mary Pierce #5 6-1 6-1 Nicole Pratt #119 Match data
Aug 5, 2004* Montreal WTA 1000 R32 Hard Mary Pierce #28 6-1 6-1 Nicole Pratt #37 Match data
Apr 9, 2003* Charleston WTA 1000 R64 Clay Mary Pierce #43 6-3 6-3 Nicole Pratt #48 Match data
Jun 28, 2000* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Mary Pierce #3 6-1 6-3 Nicole Pratt #50 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mary Pierce #560 #3 3,797 2,137 460 215 68.1% 2 5 0 3 8 18
Nicole Pratt #1,043 #35 924 1,764 156 217 41.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mary Pierce Nicole Pratt
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1989 0–3 0.0% #243 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1990 6–7 46.2% #107 1,543 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1991 21–9 70.0% #26 1,786 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1992 31–9 77.5% #13 1,901 0 4 1990 1–1 50.0% #201 1,497 0 0
18 1993 38–15 71.7% #12 2,003 0 5 1991 1–7 12.5% #201 1,469 0 0
19 1994 43–16 72.9% #5 2,053 0 5 1992 3–3 50.0% #203 1,491 0 0
20 1995 35–14 71.4% #5 2,008 1 7 1993 2–5 28.6% #172 1,486 0 0
21 1996 17–11 60.7% #24 1,899 1 7 1994 2–5 28.6% #224 1,465 0 0
22 1997 45–15 75.0% #7 2,053 1 8 1995 0–2 0.0% #214 1,451 0 0
23 1998 35–12 74.5% #7 2,120 1 12 1996 0–2 0.0% #194 1,434 0 0
24 1999 45–19 70.3% #5 2,053 1 13 1997 5–4 55.6% #110 1,494 0 0
25 2000 29–11 72.5% #7 2,033 2 15 1998 4–13 23.5% #113 1,464 0 0
26 2001 6–8 42.9% #129 1,839 2 15 1999 15–17 46.9% #56 1,598 0 0
27 2002 14–13 51.9% #52 1,752 2 15 2000 16–23 41.0% #54 1,621 0 0
28 2003 23–17 57.5% #33 1,786 2 15 2001 22–23 48.9% #51 1,704 0 0
29 2004 22–16 57.9% #29 1,754 2 16 2002 23–20 53.5% #48 1,719 0 0
30 2005 41–12 77.4% #5 2,119 2 18 2003 17–23 42.5% #53 1,646 0 0
31 2006 9–8 52.9% #79 1,967 2 18 2004 19–21 47.5% #50 1,604 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 2005 8–17 32.0% #126 1,544 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 2006 8–12 40.0% #77 1,546 0 1
34 — — — — — — — 2007 10–16 38.5% #70 1,566 0 1
35 — — — — — — — 2008 0–3 0.0% #1043 1,545 0 1