H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Mary Pierce vs Nuria Llagostera Vives H2H: 0-1

Nuria Llagostera Vives holds a 1–0 lead over Mary Pierce in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nuria Llagostera Vives leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Nuria Llagostera Vives won the 2005 Charleston Open round of 32 6-4 7-6(3).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mary Pierce
FRA Age 51 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Nuria Llagostera Vives
ESP Age 46 Right-Handed 156 cm / 5'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nuria Llagostera Vives #63 6-4 7-6(3) Mary Pierce #27 Match data Apr 14, 2005* R32 Charleston Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mary Pierce #560 #3 3,797 2,145 465 218 68.1% 2 5 0 5 6 18
Nuria Llagostera Vives #775 #35 968 1,685 78 111 41.3% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mary Pierce Nuria Llagostera Vives
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1989 0–3 0.0% #243 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1990 6–7 46.2% #107 1,543 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1991 21–9 70.0% #26 1,785 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1992 32–10 76.2% #13 1,900 0 4 — — — — — — —
18 1993 38–15 71.7% #12 2,003 0 5 — — — — — — —
19 1994 43–16 72.9% #5 2,055 0 5 — — — — — — —
20 1995 35–14 71.4% #5 2,007 1 7 2000 4–6 40.0% #128 1,509 0 0
21 1996 18–12 60.0% #24 1,881 1 7 2001 8–12 40.0% #103 1,500 0 0
22 1997 45–15 75.0% #7 2,066 1 8 2002 1–8 11.1% #192 1,442 0 0
23 1998 35–12 74.5% #7 2,124 1 12 2003 1–2 33.3% #140 1,450 0 0
24 1999 45–19 70.3% #5 2,053 1 13 2004 4–6 40.0% #76 1,485 0 0
25 2000 29–11 72.5% #7 2,032 2 15 2005 20–19 51.3% #50 1,617 0 1
26 2001 6–8 42.9% #129 1,838 2 15 2006 6–5 54.5% #275 1,624 0 1
27 2002 14–13 51.9% #52 1,751 2 15 2007 5–10 33.3% #145 1,557 0 1
28 2003 23–17 57.5% #33 1,786 2 15 2008 14–11 56.0% #68 1,626 0 2
29 2004 25–17 59.5% #29 1,785 2 16 2009 8–16 33.3% #146 1,562 0 2
30 2005 41–12 77.4% #5 2,128 2 18 2010 4–7 36.4% #127 1,566 0 2
31 2006 9–8 52.9% #79 1,974 2 18 2011 3–9 25.0% #131 1,550 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mary Pierce Nuria Llagostera Vives
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1990 1 1 2 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1991 12 6 18 66.7% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1992 9 2 11 81.8% 11 4 15 73.3% — — — — 12 4 16 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1993 19 6 25 76.0% 13 5 18 72.2% — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1994 15 5 20 75.0% 16 6 22 72.7% — — — — 12 5 17 70.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1995 25 6 31 80.6% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2000 1 1 2 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — —
21 1996 4 4 8 50.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2001 2 2 4 50.0% 6 9 15 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 1997 14 6 20 70.0% 21 4 25 84.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 2002 1 4 5 20.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 1998 14 6 20 70.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 14 1 15 93.3% 2003 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
24 1999 24 10 34 70.6% 11 5 16 68.8% 3 1 4 75.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 2004 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
25 2000 13 6 19 68.4% 15 3 18 83.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2005 9 13 22 40.9% 11 4 15 73.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
26 2001 5 4 9 55.6% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2006 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2002 1 5 6 16.7% 11 6 17 64.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2007 0 3 3 0.0% 5 7 12 41.7% — — — — — — — —
28 2003 14 10 24 58.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2008 3 4 7 42.9% 11 6 17 64.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2004 12 9 21 57.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 5 1 6 83.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 2009 4 6 10 40.0% 4 9 13 30.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 2005 19 5 24 79.2% 13 5 18 72.2% 4 1 5 80.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 2010 1 3 4 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2006 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% 2011 0 4 4 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — —
Career — 207 99 306 67.6% 157 72 229 68.6% 27 13 40 67.5% 74 34 108 68.5% — 28 48 76 36.8% 49 56 105 46.7% 1 7 8 12.5% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 60/152 of Mary Pierce's and 77/147 of Nuria Llagostera Vives's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Mary Pierce Nuria Llagostera Vives
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 1/10 2.0 6.0 50.8% 66.7% 31.3% 54.5% 27.3% 49.2% 40.6%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 5/39 1.6 5.8 52.8% 62.1% 45.5% 54.2% 37.3% 54.3% 44.2%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 2/11 1.0 2.5 47.8% 52.5% 40.4% 12.5% 28.6% 46.5% 39.3%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 9/15 0.3 3.4 55.8% 58.6% 43.0% 61.5% 50.2% 51.6% 45.8%
28 2003 9/40 3.9 1.9 64.5% 68.8% 54.0% 63.9% 46.3% 63.3% 44.5% 2008 17/25 1.4 4.6 53.5% 62.2% 47.0% 49.9% 51.9% 55.0% 45.3%
29 2004 7/42 1.6 2.1 67.0% 71.4% 54.8% 59.0% 37.4% 66.4% 41.8% 2009 21/24 1.2 5.7 50.7% 63.1% 40.0% 53.6% 47.6% 51.6% 43.8%
30 2005 28/53 3.1 1.5 68.1% 68.9% 54.4% 59.1% 48.4% 64.3% 46.0% 2010 10/11 0.7 4.3 54.1% 62.1% 42.3% 53.8% 48.4% 53.4% 39.3%
31 2006 16/17 3.5 1.4 67.3% 69.2% 47.5% 52.5% 42.1% 62.2% 42.2% 2011 12/12 1.3 5.8 49.8% 61.0% 42.0% 46.3% 40.8% 51.5% 44.2%
Career — 60/683 3.1 1.6 67.2% 69.2% 52.6% 58.1% 45.1% 63.9% 44.3% — 77/189 1.1 4.9 52.3% 61.6% 42.8% 51.6% 46.5% 52.6% 43.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mary Pierce Nuria Llagostera Vives
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1989 1480 106.2 — — — — — — — 14.3% -2.43 0–1 — — -0.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1990 1544 134.3 — — — — +3 +35 — 48.3% +0.52 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1991 1786 146.7 — — — — -38 -56 — 66.7% +1.33 6–2 (75%) 5–1 (83%) 108.5 +1.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1992 1900 149.4 — — — — -37 -50 — 75.3% +2.01 4–3 (57%) 5–4 (56%) 100.2 +3.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1993 2003 165.9 — — — — -4 -109 — 70.4% +1.83 6–5 (55%) 6–9 (40%) 98.2 +1.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1994 2055 169.7 — — — — -25 -54 — 70.9% +1.86 5–4 (56%) 4–1 (80%) 100.7 +0.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1995 2008 168.6 — — — — +34 -13 — 72.1% +1.78 3–5 (38%) 2–2 (50%) 94.5 +1.10 2000 1510 109.4 — — — — — +32 — 45.8% -0.33 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — +0.01
21 1996 1881 134.2 — — — — +65 +72 -205 58.3% +0.64 6–6 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 98.2 +2.43 2001 1500 109.9 — — — — +59 +14 — 45.8% -0.60 2–6 (25%) 3–2 (60%) 97.9 +0.82
22 1997 2066 169.1 — — — — -62 +83 -301 68.5% +1.35 12–4 (75%) 6–3 (67%) 108.2 -4.07 2002 1443 104.5 — — — — +95 -4 — 27.3% -1.77 0–4 (0%) — — -0.25
23 1998 2124 173.3 — — — — +36 -4 — 66.0% +1.50 12–0 (100%) 3–5 (38%) 110.4 -2.64 2003 1450 110.8 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.75 0–2 — — -0.05
24 1999 2053 167.4 — — — — +28 +14 -309 67.8% +1.34 10–7 (59%) 12–6 (67%) 99.5 +1.22 2004 1486 108.9 -1.40 -1.05 0.800 45.0% +38 -8 — 44.0% -0.08 2–3 (40%) 1–3 (25%) 98.0 -0.15
25 2000 2033 163.9 — — — — -27 +116 — 72.3% +2.00 5–2 (71%) 2–2 (50%) 101.4 -0.29 2005 1618 123.7 -0.47 +0.31 0.967 49.5% -57 +62 — 49.4% -0.33 7–4 (64%) 6–3 (67%) 105.4 +0.18
26 2001 1839 112.0 — — — — +44 +254 — 48.4% -0.13 0–3 (0%) 2–0 — +1.21 2006 1625 118.7 -2.02 -1.39 0.733 42.6% -39 — — 58.3% +0.29 2–2 (50%) — — -0.05
27 2002 1752 124.6 — — — — +10 +260 +15 55.0% +0.35 3–5 (38%) 1–4 (20%) 92.5 -0.57 2007 1557 102.8 -2.20 +0.35 0.946 48.8% -23 +78 — 31.0% -1.21 0–1 1–1 — -0.03
28 2003 1787 140.5 +4.39 +0.45 1.214 53.8% -23 +157 +58 58.1% +0.66 6–4 (60%) 3–6 (33%) 98.2 -0.38 2008 1627 122.9 0.00 +0.20 1.006 50.2% -58 +58 — 55.4% +0.36 3–5 (38%) 3–2 (60%) 98.5 -0.25
29 2004 1785 145.7 +5.15 -0.28 1.246 53.7% -31 +86 +122 59.6% +1.00 2–3 (40%) 2–5 (29%) 94.9 -1.86 2009 1563 117.9 -2.95 +0.09 0.904 47.7% +2 +47 — 41.8% -0.65 2–7 (22%) 5–2 (71%) 98.4 -0.33
30 2005 2128 166.4 +7.54 +2.70 1.291 54.8% -48 -147 -186 71.7% +1.54 8–1 (89%) 7–5 (58%) 108.3 -3.66 2010 1567 113.6 -0.81 -2.10 0.844 47.0% -9 +56 — 36.0% -0.80 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — -0.25
31 2006 1975 136.3 +4.44 -0.56 1.116 52.0% -39 — — 55.9% +0.27 1–1 5–3 (63%) — -0.83 2011 1551 125.4 -0.89 +0.18 0.911 48.0% -20 +59 — 32.1% -0.79 1–3 (25%) — — -1.00
Career — 2145 166.5 +5.96 +1.15 1.225 53.8% -10 +27 -119 66.1% +1.33 90–58 (61%) 69–58 (54%) 101.5 -0.38 — 1685 122.8 -1.41 -0.16 0.921 48.3% -20 +45 — 44.5% -0.46 22–41 (35%) 21–15 (58%) 97.7 -0.71

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.