H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Mary Pierce vs Paola Suarez H2H: 2-4

Paola Suarez holds a 4–2 lead over Mary Pierce in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Paola Suarez leads 4–1 on hard courts, while Mary Pierce leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mary Pierce won the 2004 Filderstadt third round 6-2 6-3.

FRA Age 51 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2 4
6 main draw meetings
ARG Age 50 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 7, 2004* Filderstadt WTA 500 R32 Hard Mary Pierce #26 6-2 6-3 Paola Suarez #16 Match data
Aug 11, 2003 Toronto WTA 1000 R32 Hard Paola Suarez #32 6-4 7-5 Mary Pierce #69 Match data
Jan 3, 2003* Auckland WTA 250 R16 Hard Paola Suarez #27 4-6 6-4 6-4 Mary Pierce #52 Match data
Aug 28, 2002* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Paola Suarez #32 7-6(3) 6-3 Mary Pierce #47 Match data
Jan 21, 2001* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Paola Suarez #33 6-3 6-2 Mary Pierce #7 Match data
May 2, 1997* Hamburg WTA 250 R16 Clay Mary Pierce #15 3-6 7-6 6-3 Paola Suarez #63 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mary Pierce #560 #3 3,797 2,137 460 215 68.1% 2 5 0 3 8 18
Paola Suarez #525 #9 2,081 1,916 223 180 55.3% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mary Pierce Paola Suarez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1989 0–3 0.0% #243 1,480 0 0
15 1990 6–7 46.2% #107 1,543 0 0
16 1991 21–9 70.0% #26 1,786 0 1
17 1992 31–9 77.5% #13 1,901 0 4 1993 2–1 66.7% #197 1,519 0 0
18 1993 38–15 71.7% #12 2,003 0 5 1994 5–8 38.5% #114 1,536 0 0
19 1994 43–16 72.9% #5 2,053 0 5 1995 2–6 25.0% #122 1,522 0 0
20 1995 35–14 71.4% #5 2,008 1 7 1996 12–11 52.2% #62 1,618 0 0
21 1996 17–11 60.7% #24 1,899 1 7 1997 6–16 27.3% #118 1,556 0 0
22 1997 45–15 75.0% #7 2,053 1 8 1998 10–9 52.6% #80 1,535 0 1
23 1998 35–12 74.5% #7 2,120 1 12 1999 12–12 50.0% #72 1,597 0 1
24 1999 45–19 70.3% #5 2,053 1 13 2000 27–22 55.1% #36 1,677 0 1
25 2000 29–11 72.5% #7 2,033 2 15 2001 27–15 64.3% #27 1,736 0 2
26 2001 6–8 42.9% #129 1,839 2 15 2002 30–23 56.6% #27 1,697 0 2
27 2002 14–13 51.9% #52 1,752 2 15 2003 37–22 62.7% #14 1,859 0 3
28 2003 23–17 57.5% #33 1,786 2 15 2004 37–17 68.5% #16 1,804 0 4
29 2004 22–16 57.9% #29 1,754 2 16 2005 3–7 30.0% #238 1,712 0 4
30 2005 41–12 77.4% #5 2,119 2 18 2006 10–9 52.6% #178 1,699 0 4
31 2006 9–8 52.9% #79 1,967 2 18 2007 3–2 60.0% #300 1,689 0 4