H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Mary Pierce vs Rachel Mcquillan H2H: 3-1

Mary Pierce holds a 3–1 lead over Rachel Mcquillan in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Mary Pierce leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Rachel Mcquillan won the 2001 Dubai quarterfinal 6-3 6-1.

FRA Age 51 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3 1
4 main draw meetings
AUS Age 54 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 24, 2001* Dubai WTA 500 QF Hard Rachel Mcquillan #111 6-3 6-1 Mary Pierce #7 Match data
Aug 5, 1995* San Diego WTA 500 QF Hard Mary Pierce #3 6-2 6-4 Rachel Mcquillan #85 Match data
Aug 15, 1994 Toronto WTA 1000 R32 Hard Mary Pierce #5 6-3 6-3 Rachel Mcquillan #65 Match data
May 27, 1993* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Mary Pierce #15 6-4 6-0 Rachel Mcquillan #79 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mary Pierce #560 #3 3,797 2,137 460 215 68.1% 2 5 0 3 8 18
Rachel Mcquillan #971 #28 582 1,826 163 195 45.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mary Pierce Rachel Mcquillan
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1989 0–3 0.0% #243 1,480 0 0
15 1990 6–7 46.2% #107 1,543 0 0
16 1991 21–9 70.0% #26 1,786 0 1 1988 3–4 42.9% #159 1,525 0 0
17 1992 31–9 77.5% #13 1,901 0 4 1989 13–15 46.4% #79 1,624 0 0
18 1993 38–15 71.7% #12 2,003 0 5 1990 27–21 56.2% #39 1,709 0 0
19 1994 43–16 72.9% #5 2,053 0 5 1991 26–20 56.5% #36 1,744 0 0
20 1995 35–14 71.4% #5 2,008 1 7 1992 18–13 58.1% #38 1,752 0 0
21 1996 17–11 60.7% #24 1,899 1 7 1993 13–23 36.1% #115 1,573 0 0
22 1997 45–15 75.0% #7 2,053 1 8 1994 20–17 54.1% #61 1,650 0 0
23 1998 35–12 74.5% #7 2,120 1 12 1995 13–16 44.8% #69 1,668 0 0
24 1999 45–19 70.3% #5 2,053 1 13 1996 2–9 18.2% #186 1,568 0 0
25 2000 29–11 72.5% #7 2,033 2 15 1997 10–10 50.0% #48 1,647 0 0
26 2001 6–8 42.9% #129 1,839 2 15 1998 3–15 16.7% #185 1,529 0 0
27 2002 14–13 51.9% #52 1,752 2 15 1999 1–3 25.0% #160 1,521 0 0
28 2003 23–17 57.5% #33 1,786 2 15 2000 0–4 0.0% #107 1,464 0 0
29 2004 22–16 57.9% #29 1,754 2 16 2001 12–17 41.4% #79 1,507 0 0
30 2005 41–12 77.4% #5 2,119 2 18 2002 2–7 22.2% #178 1,462 0 0
31 2006 9–8 52.9% #79 1,967 2 18 2003 0–1 0.0% #355 1,453 0 0