H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Mary Pierce vs Sandra Cecchini H2H: 3-0

Mary Pierce holds a 3–0 lead over Sandra Cecchini in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Mary Pierce leads 3–0 on clay. Most recently, Mary Pierce won the 1997 Rome second round 6-1 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mary Pierce
FRA Age 51 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
Sandra Cecchini
ITA Age 61 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 7, 1997* Rome WTA 1000 R64 Clay Mary Pierce #15 6-1 6-1 Sandra Cecchini #131 Match data
Jul 11, 1993* Palermo WTA 250 SF Clay Mary Pierce #14 6-2 6-2 Sandra Cecchini #32 Match data
Jul 14, 1991* Palermo WTA 250 F Clay Mary Pierce #91 6-0 6-3 Sandra Cecchini #20 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mary Pierce #560 #3 3,797 2,137 460 215 68.1% 2 5 0 3 8 18
Sandra Cecchini #487 #15 279 1,937 299 215 58.2% 0 0 0 3 8 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mary Pierce Sandra Cecchini
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1989 0–3 0.0% #243 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1990 6–7 46.2% #107 1,543 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1991 21–9 70.0% #26 1,786 0 1 1981 0–2 0.0% — 1,477 0 0
17 1992 31–9 77.5% #13 1,901 0 4 1982 2–2 50.0% — 1,485 0 0
18 1993 38–15 71.7% #12 2,003 0 5 1983 1–1 50.0% — 1,497 0 0
19 1994 43–16 72.9% #5 2,053 0 5 1984 17–15 53.1% #49 1,651 0 1
20 1995 35–14 71.4% #5 2,008 1 7 1985 22–19 53.7% #49 1,746 0 2
21 1996 17–11 60.7% #24 1,899 1 7 1986 15–19 44.1% #73 1,635 0 3
22 1997 45–15 75.0% #7 2,053 1 8 1987 36–16 69.2% #18 1,860 0 5
23 1998 35–12 74.5% #7 2,120 1 12 1988 34–14 70.8% #21 1,845 0 7
24 1999 45–19 70.3% #5 2,053 1 13 1989 28–15 65.1% #26 1,798 0 8
25 2000 29–11 72.5% #7 2,033 2 15 1990 26–14 65.0% #20 1,815 0 9
26 2001 6–8 42.9% #129 1,839 2 15 1991 22–13 62.9% #27 1,776 0 10
27 2002 14–13 51.9% #52 1,752 2 15 1992 23–15 60.5% #34 1,824 0 11
28 2003 23–17 57.5% #33 1,786 2 15 1993 18–15 54.5% #56 1,725 0 11
29 2004 22–16 57.9% #29 1,754 2 16 1994 28–16 63.6% #33 1,840 0 11
30 2005 41–12 77.4% #5 2,119 2 18 1995 9–14 39.1% #108 1,661 0 11
31 2006 9–8 52.9% #79 1,967 2 18 1996 10–10 50.0% #80 1,629 0 11
32 — — — — — — — 1997 4–7 36.4% #206 1,610 0 11
33 — — — — — — — 1998 4–8 33.3% #200 1,556 0 11