H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Mary Pierce vs Sandrine Testud H2H: 6-1

Mary Pierce holds a 6–1 lead over Sandrine Testud in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Mary Pierce leads 2–1 on hard courts and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Mary Pierce won the 2002 Wimbledon second round 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mary Pierce
FRA Age 51 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
6 – 1
7 main draw meetings
Sandrine Testud
FRA Age 54 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 28, 2002* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Mary Pierce #74 6-3 6-4 Sandrine Testud #10 Match data
Jan 12, 2001* Canberra WTA 250 SF Hard Sandrine Testud #17 6-2 6-2 Mary Pierce #7 Match data
Oct 31, 1999* Linz WTA 500 F Carpet Mary Pierce #6 7-6 6-1 Sandrine Testud #19 Match data
Aug 21, 1999* Canadian Open WTA 1000 QF Hard Mary Pierce #6 6-1 6-3 Sandrine Testud #14 Match data
May 8, 1999* Rome WTA 1000 QF Clay Mary Pierce #8 6-4 7-5 Sandrine Testud #11 Match data
Aug 2, 1997* San Diego WTA 500 QF Hard Mary Pierce #11 6-3 6-2 Sandrine Testud #20 Match data
Jun 1, 1997* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Mary Pierce #10 6-1 6-3 Sandrine Testud #22 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mary Pierce #560 #3 3,797 2,137 460 215 68.1% 2 5 0 3 8 18
Sandrine Testud #1,203 #9 2,233 2,019 309 236 56.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mary Pierce Sandrine Testud
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1989 0–3 0.0% #243 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1990 6–7 46.2% #107 1,543 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1991 21–9 70.0% #26 1,786 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1992 31–9 77.5% #13 1,901 0 4 — — — — — — —
18 1993 38–15 71.7% #12 2,003 0 5 1990 0–2 0.0% #170 1,484 0 0
19 1994 43–16 72.9% #5 2,053 0 5 1991 8–10 44.4% #109 1,546 0 0
20 1995 35–14 71.4% #5 2,008 1 7 1992 11–17 39.3% #106 1,566 0 0
21 1996 17–11 60.7% #24 1,899 1 7 1993 11–19 36.7% #100 1,560 0 0
22 1997 45–15 75.0% #7 2,053 1 8 1994 10–14 41.7% #81 1,604 0 0
23 1998 35–12 74.5% #7 2,120 1 12 1995 19–16 54.3% #41 1,736 0 0
24 1999 45–19 70.3% #5 2,053 1 13 1996 21–17 55.3% #41 1,771 0 0
25 2000 29–11 72.5% #7 2,033 2 15 1997 41–22 65.1% #14 1,938 0 1
26 2001 6–8 42.9% #129 1,839 2 15 1998 51–26 66.2% #14 1,946 0 2
27 2002 14–13 51.9% #52 1,752 2 15 1999 36–25 59.0% #13 1,900 0 2
28 2003 23–17 57.5% #33 1,786 2 15 2000 30–20 60.0% #17 1,916 0 2
29 2004 22–16 57.9% #29 1,754 2 16 2001 53–27 66.2% #11 1,976 0 3
30 2005 41–12 77.4% #5 2,119 2 18 2002 17–14 54.8% #38 1,845 0 3
31 2006 9–8 52.9% #79 1,967 2 18 — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — 2004 1–7 12.5% #313 1,739 0 3