H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Mary Pierce vs Steffi Graf H2H: 2-4

Steffi Graf holds a 4–2 lead over Mary Pierce in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Steffi Graf leads 4–0 on hard courts, while Mary Pierce leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Steffi Graf won the 1995 Paris final 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mary Pierce
FRA Age 51 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2 – 4
6 main draw meetings
Steffi Graf
GER Age 57 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 20, 1995* Paris WTA 500 F Hard Steffi Graf #1 6-2 6-2 Mary Pierce #3 Match data
Nov 14, 1994 Virginia Slims Championships WTA Finals QF Carpet Mary Pierce #5 6-4 6-4 Steffi Graf #1 Match data
Aug 15, 1994 Toronto WTA 1000 SF Hard Steffi Graf #1 6-3 6-4 Mary Pierce #5 Match data
Jun 4, 1994* Roland Garros Grand Slam SF Clay Mary Pierce #12 6-2 6-2 Steffi Graf #1 Match data
Sep 7, 1993* US Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Steffi Graf #1 6-1 6-0 Mary Pierce #15 Match data
Aug 6, 1993* San Diego WTA 500 QF Hard Steffi Graf #1 6-3 6-4 Mary Pierce #14 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mary Pierce #560 #3 3,797 2,137 460 215 68.1% 2 5 0 3 8 18
Steffi Graf #3 #1 5,028 2,600 866 109 88.8% 22 17 5 12 50 106

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mary Pierce Steffi Graf
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
12 — — — — — — — 1981 1–1 50.0% — 1,502 0 0
13 — — — — — — — 1982 2–4 33.3% — 1,507 0 0
14 1989 0–3 0.0% #243 1,480 0 0 1983 6–7 46.2% — 1,546 0 0
15 1990 6–7 46.2% #107 1,543 0 0 1984 17–13 56.7% #22 1,747 0 0
16 1991 21–9 70.0% #26 1,786 0 1 1985 40–13 75.5% #6 2,037 0 0
17 1992 31–9 77.5% #13 1,901 0 4 1986 63–6 91.3% #3 2,329 0 8
18 1993 38–15 71.7% #12 2,003 0 5 1987 70–2 97.2% #1 2,505 1 19
19 1994 43–16 72.9% #5 2,053 0 5 1988 68–3 95.8% #1 2,535 5 29
20 1995 35–14 71.4% #5 2,008 1 7 1989 85–2 97.7% #1 2,584 8 43
21 1996 17–11 60.7% #24 1,899 1 7 1990 72–5 93.5% #1 2,510 9 53
22 1997 45–15 75.0% #7 2,053 1 8 1991 64–8 88.9% #2 2,418 10 60
23 1998 35–12 74.5% #7 2,120 1 12 1992 61–6 91.0% #2 2,448 11 68
24 1999 45–19 70.3% #5 2,053 1 13 1993 77–5 93.9% #1 2,510 14 78
25 2000 29–11 72.5% #7 2,033 2 15 1994 58–6 90.6% #1 2,417 15 85
26 2001 6–8 42.9% #129 1,839 2 15 1995 48–2 96.0% #1 2,466 18 94
27 2002 14–13 51.9% #52 1,752 2 15 1996 51–4 92.7% #1 2,446 21 101
28 2003 23–17 57.5% #33 1,786 2 15 1997 16–4 80.0% #28 2,353 21 102
29 2004 22–16 57.9% #29 1,754 2 16 1998 33–9 78.6% #9 2,284 21 105
30 2005 41–12 77.4% #5 2,119 2 18 1999 34–9 79.1% #3 2,242 22 106
31 2006 9–8 52.9% #79 1,967 2 18 — — — — — — —