H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Mary Pierce vs Sung-Hee Park H2H: 1-0
Mary Pierce holds a 1–0 lead over Sung-Hee Park in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mary Pierce leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mary Pierce won the 1996 Tokyo fourth round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 51
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
KOR
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 1996* | Tokyo | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Mary Pierce | 7-5 6-2 | Sung-Hee Park | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mary Pierce | #560 | #3 | 3,797 | 2,137 | 460 | 215 | 68.1% | 2 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 18 |
| Sung-Hee Park | #599 | #57 | 271 | 1,626 | 29 | 51 | 36.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Mary Pierce | Sung-Hee Park | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1989 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #243 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #233 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #107 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #101 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 21–9 | 70.0% | #26 | 1,786 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 31–9 | 77.5% | #13 | 1,901 | 0 | 4 | 1996 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #101 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 38–15 | 71.7% | #12 | 2,003 | 0 | 5 | 1997 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #111 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 43–16 | 72.9% | #5 | 2,053 | 0 | 5 | 1998 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #153 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 35–14 | 71.4% | #5 | 2,008 | 1 | 7 | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,434 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #24 | 1,899 | 1 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1997 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #7 | 2,053 | 1 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1998 | 35–12 | 74.5% | #7 | 2,120 | 1 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1999 | 45–19 | 70.3% | #5 | 2,053 | 1 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2000 | 29–11 | 72.5% | #7 | 2,033 | 2 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2001 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #129 | 1,839 | 2 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2002 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #52 | 1,752 | 2 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2003 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #33 | 1,786 | 2 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #29 | 1,754 | 2 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 41–12 | 77.4% | #5 | 2,119 | 2 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #79 | 1,967 | 2 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |