H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Mary Pierce vs Virginia Ruano Pascual H2H: 3-2

Mary Pierce holds a 3–2 lead over Virginia Ruano Pascual in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while Mary Pierce leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mary Pierce won the 2004 US Open second round 6-0 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mary Pierce
FRA Age 51 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
Virginia Ruano Pascual
ESP Age 52 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 2, 2004* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Mary Pierce #29 6-0 6-1 Virginia Ruano Pascual #70 Match data
Jun 23, 2004* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Virginia Ruano Pascual #67 6-2 7-5 Mary Pierce #23 Match data
May 7, 2003* Berlin WTA 1000 R64 Clay Virginia Ruano Pascual #39 7-6(7) (ret.) Mary Pierce #42 Match data
Mar 21, 1999* Key Biscayne WTA 1000 R32 Hard Mary Pierce #8 6-1 6-1 Virginia Ruano Pascual #30 Match data
Jun 27, 1997* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Mary Pierce #9 6-0 2-6 6-3 Virginia Ruano Pascual #54 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mary Pierce #560 #3 3,797 2,137 460 215 68.1% 2 5 0 3 8 18
Virginia Ruano Pascual #998 #28 893 1,819 199 235 45.9% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mary Pierce Virginia Ruano Pascual
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1989 0–3 0.0% #243 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1990 6–7 46.2% #107 1,543 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1991 21–9 70.0% #26 1,786 0 1 1990 0–1 0.0% #307 1,481 0 0
17 1992 31–9 77.5% #13 1,901 0 4 1991 2–2 50.0% #194 1,500 0 0
18 1993 38–15 71.7% #12 2,003 0 5 1992 1–4 20.0% #137 1,494 0 0
19 1994 43–16 72.9% #5 2,053 0 5 1993 6–10 37.5% #126 1,515 0 0
20 1995 35–14 71.4% #5 2,008 1 7 1994 0–4 0.0% #171 1,477 0 0
21 1996 17–11 60.7% #24 1,899 1 7 1995 11–13 45.8% #61 1,562 0 0
22 1997 45–15 75.0% #7 2,053 1 8 1996 8–15 34.8% #87 1,570 0 0
23 1998 35–12 74.5% #7 2,120 1 12 1997 18–10 64.3% #52 1,730 0 1
24 1999 45–19 70.3% #5 2,053 1 13 1998 22–16 57.9% #32 1,774 0 2
25 2000 29–11 72.5% #7 2,033 2 15 1999 12–16 42.9% #85 1,659 0 2
26 2001 6–8 42.9% #129 1,839 2 15 2000 8–8 50.0% #89 1,644 0 2
27 2002 14–13 51.9% #52 1,752 2 15 2001 13–18 41.9% #56 1,607 0 2
28 2003 23–17 57.5% #33 1,786 2 15 2002 19–21 47.5% #65 1,633 0 2
29 2004 22–16 57.9% #29 1,754 2 16 2003 19–17 52.8% #55 1,694 0 3
30 2005 41–12 77.4% #5 2,119 2 18 2004 12–16 42.9% #64 1,646 0 3
31 2006 9–8 52.9% #79 1,967 2 18 2005 10–18 35.7% #107 1,560 0 3
32 — — — — — — — 2006 15–13 53.6% #66 1,659 0 3
33 — — — — — — — 2007 11–14 44.0% #81 1,630 0 3
34 — — — — — — — 2008 9–12 42.9% #107 1,622 0 3
35 — — — — — — — 2009 3–5 37.5% #200 1,621 0 3
36 — — — — — — — 2010 0–2 0.0% #998 1,591 0 3