H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Mary Pierce vs Zina Garrison H2H: 1-3

Zina Garrison holds a 3–1 lead over Mary Pierce in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Zina Garrison leads 2–0 on carpet, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Zina Garrison won the 1995 Philadelphia fourth round 6-3 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mary Pierce
FRA Age 51 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 3
4 main draw meetings
Zina Garrison
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Nov 10, 1995* Philadelphia WTA 1000 R16 Carpet Zina Garrison #30 6-3 7-5 Mary Pierce #4 Match data
Oct 16, 1993* Filderstadt WTA 250 SF Hard Mary Pierce #16 6-2 6-2 Zina Garrison #18 Match data
Mar 19, 1991* Key Biscayne WTA 1000 R16 Hard Zina Garrison #9 6-3 6-4 Mary Pierce #122 Match data
Feb 15, 1990* Chicago WTA 1000 R32 Carpet Zina Garrison #4 6-4 6-4 Mary Pierce #198 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mary Pierce #560 #3 3,797 2,137 460 215 68.1% 2 5 0 3 8 18
Zina Garrison #318 #4 134 2,142 581 268 68.4% 0 0 0 1 14 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mary Pierce Zina Garrison
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1989 0–3 0.0% #243 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1990 6–7 46.2% #107 1,543 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1991 21–9 70.0% #26 1,786 0 1 1980 2–2 50.0% — 1,529 0 1
17 1992 31–9 77.5% #13 1,901 0 4 1981 5–5 50.0% — 1,568 0 1
18 1993 38–15 71.7% #12 2,003 0 5 1982 23–15 60.5% — 1,853 0 1
19 1994 43–16 72.9% #5 2,053 0 5 1983 38–18 67.9% — 1,989 0 1
20 1995 35–14 71.4% #5 2,008 1 7 1984 47–20 70.1% #9 2,012 0 2
21 1996 17–11 60.7% #24 1,899 1 7 1985 51–18 73.9% #8 2,032 0 4
22 1997 45–15 75.0% #7 2,053 1 8 1986 48–22 68.6% #11 1,999 0 5
23 1998 35–12 74.5% #7 2,120 1 12 1987 44–17 72.1% #9 1,987 0 7
24 1999 45–19 70.3% #5 2,053 1 13 1988 49–20 71.0% #9 2,021 0 7
25 2000 29–11 72.5% #7 2,033 2 15 1989 60–15 80.0% #4 2,130 0 10
26 2001 6–8 42.9% #129 1,839 2 15 1990 48–18 72.7% #10 2,039 0 11
27 2002 14–13 51.9% #52 1,752 2 15 1991 37–18 67.3% #12 1,963 0 11
28 2003 23–17 57.5% #33 1,786 2 15 1992 36–19 65.5% #18 1,924 0 12
29 2004 22–16 57.9% #29 1,754 2 16 1993 43–19 69.4% #14 1,995 0 14
30 2005 41–12 77.4% #5 2,119 2 18 1994 24–16 60.0% #24 1,889 0 14
31 2006 9–8 52.9% #79 1,967 2 18 1995 25–16 61.0% #22 1,868 0 15
32 — — — — — — — 1996 1–10 9.1% #273 1,704 0 15