H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Mary Sawyer vs Betsy Nagelsen H2H: 0-2

Betsy Nagelsen holds a 2–0 lead over Mary Sawyer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Betsy Nagelsen leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Betsy Nagelsen won the 1979 Kyoto semifinal 7-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mary Sawyer
Age 69
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
Betsy Nagelsen
USA Age 69 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 20, 1979* Kyoto WTA 250 SF — Betsy Nagelsen 7-6 6-3 Mary Sawyer Match data
Apr 1, 1978* Stuart WTA 250 R32 Clay Betsy Nagelsen 4-6 6-1 6-4 Mary Sawyer Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mary Sawyer — — — 1,600 22 31 41.5% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Betsy Nagelsen #692 #25 28 1,885 266 324 45.1% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mary Sawyer Betsy Nagelsen
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1972 4–2 66.7% — 1,537 0 1
16 1973 0–1 0.0% — 1,494 0 0 1973 1–3 25.0% — 1,517 0 1
17 1974 0–1 0.0% — 1,488 0 0 1974 27–18 60.0% — 1,730 0 3
18 — — — — — — — 1975 18–17 51.4% — 1,793 0 3
19 1976 1–1 50.0% — 1,509 0 0 1976 11–19 36.7% — 1,709 0 3
20 1977 9–10 47.4% — 1,569 0 2 1977 8–15 34.8% — 1,677 0 3
21 1978 3–7 30.0% — 1,535 0 2 1978 13–24 35.1% — 1,659 0 3
22 1979 8–9 47.1% — 1,558 0 2 1979 18–19 48.6% — 1,695 0 5
23 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,542 0 2 1980 22–27 44.9% — 1,756 0 5
24 1981 1–1 50.0% — 1,539 0 2 1981 20–21 48.8% — 1,803 0 6
25 — — — — — — — 1982 12–17 41.4% — 1,704 0 6
26 — — — — — — — 1983 18–22 45.0% — 1,692 0 6
27 — — — — — — — 1984 11–18 37.9% #77 1,630 0 6
28 — — — — — — — 1985 14–12 53.8% #81 1,714 0 6
29 — — — — — — — 1986 18–17 51.4% #46 1,699 0 6
30 — — — — — — — 1987 13–15 46.4% #61 1,645 0 6
31 — — — — — — — 1988 11–19 36.7% #109 1,586 0 6
32 — — — — — — — 1989 18–15 54.5% #45 1,663 0 6
33 — — — — — — — 1990 8–12 40.0% #96 1,640 0 6
34 — — — — — — — 1991 0–2 0.0% #337 1,608 0 6
35 — — — — — — — 1992 1–5 16.7% #418 1,561 0 6
36 — — — — — — — 1993 0–4 0.0% #394 1,512 0 6
37 — — — — — — — 1994 0–1 0.0% #692 1,510 0 6