H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Masako Yanagi vs Laura Arraya H2H: 1-1
Masako Yanagi and Laura Arraya are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Laura Arraya leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Laura Arraya won the 1986 Roland Garros second round 7-5 6-7(3) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 66
Left-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
PER
Age 62
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 1986* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Laura Arraya | 7-5 6-7(3) 6-4 | Masako Yanagi | Match data |
| Oct 21, 1983* | Tokyo Japan Open | WTA 250 | R16 | — | Masako Yanagi | 3-6 6-4 6-2 | Laura Arraya | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Masako Yanagi | #496 | #89 | 9 | 1,623 | 46 | 73 | 38.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Laura Arraya | #192 | #14 | 51 | 1,922 | 270 | 204 | 57.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Masako Yanagi | Laura Arraya | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 19–8 | 70.4% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 4 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 33–17 | 66.0% | — | 1,741 | 0 | 7 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 23–23 | 50.0% | — | 1,713 | 0 | 7 |
| 20 | 1980 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #34 | 1,760 | 0 | 8 |
| 21 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #63 | 1,693 | 0 | 8 |
| 22 | 1982 | 12–7 | 63.2% | — | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #33 | 1,718 | 0 | 8 |
| 23 | 1983 | 5–3 | 62.5% | — | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #45 | 1,770 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | 1984 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #103 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1985 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #104 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 27–12 | 69.2% | #19 | 1,882 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 1986 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #113 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #21 | 1,821 | 0 | 10 |
| 27 | 1987 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #242 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #24 | 1,823 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | 1988 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #102 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #45 | 1,734 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | 1989 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #209 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #71 | 1,683 | 0 | 10 |
| 31 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #479 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1993 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #190 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |