H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Masako Yanagi vs Patricia Hy Boulais H2H: 0-1
Patricia Hy Boulais holds a 1–0 lead over Masako Yanagi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Patricia Hy Boulais leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Patricia Hy Boulais won the 1986 Singapore third round 2-6 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 66
Left-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Age 60
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 1986* | Singapore | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Patricia Hy Boulais | 2-6 7-5 6-4 | Masako Yanagi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Masako Yanagi | #496 | #89 | 9 | 1,623 | 46 | 73 | 38.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Patricia Hy Boulais | — | — | — | 1,907 | 140 | 163 | 46.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Masako Yanagi | Patricia Hy Boulais | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 7–8 | 46.7% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1980 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 8–1 | 88.9% | — | 1,633 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1982 | 12–7 | 63.2% | — | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,530 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1983 | 5–3 | 62.5% | — | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1984 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #103 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,565 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1985 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #104 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 18–17 | 51.4% | — | 1,702 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1986 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #113 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 21–15 | 58.3% | — | 1,878 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1987 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #242 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 21–15 | 58.3% | — | 1,852 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1988 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #102 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 15–16 | 48.4% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1989 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #209 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,691 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,678 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #479 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 12–19 | 38.7% | — | 1,660 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,571 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 1993 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #190 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |