H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Masako Yanagi vs Pilar Vasquez H2H: 2-1
Masako Yanagi holds a 2–1 lead over Pilar Vasquez in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Masako Yanagi leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Masako Yanagi won the 1988 Montreal second round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 66
Left-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
PER
Age 63
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 1988* | Montreal | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Masako Yanagi | 6-2 6-2 | Pilar Vasquez | Match data |
| Oct 17, 1985* | Tokyo Japan Open | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Masako Yanagi | 6-1 6-1 | Pilar Vasquez | Match data |
| Oct 23, 1982* | Tokyo Japan Open | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Pilar Vasquez | 6-2 6-2 | Masako Yanagi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Masako Yanagi | #496 | #89 | 9 | 1,623 | 46 | 73 | 38.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Pilar Vasquez | #772 | #66 | 8 | 1,786 | 96 | 133 | 41.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Masako Yanagi | Pilar Vasquez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 17–3 | 85.0% | — | 1,661 | 0 | 3 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 22–11 | 66.7% | — | 1,700 | 0 | 4 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,620 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | 1980 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,611 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #116 | 1,544 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1982 | 12–7 | 63.2% | — | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #116 | 1,438 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1983 | 5–3 | 62.5% | — | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #149 | 1,408 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1984 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #103 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #151 | 1,482 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1985 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #104 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #161 | 1,510 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1986 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #113 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #194 | 1,497 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1987 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #242 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #151 | 1,473 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 1988 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #102 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #306 | 1,408 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 1989 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #209 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #292 | 1,420 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #479 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1993 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #190 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |