H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Mathilde Johansson vs Catalina Castano H2H: 2-0
Mathilde Johansson holds a 2–0 lead over Catalina Castano in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mathilde Johansson leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Mathilde Johansson won the 2011 Bogota quarterfinal 6-3 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 41
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
COL
Age 47
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 2011* | Bogota | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Mathilde Johansson | 6-3 7-6(5) | Catalina Castano | Match data |
| Feb 19, 2009* | Bogota | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Mathilde Johansson | 6-7(2) 6-4 6-4 | Catalina Castano | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mathilde Johansson | #235 | #59 | 992 | 1,619 | 44 | 75 | 37.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Catalina Castano | #1,073 | #35 | 623 | 1,703 | 83 | 109 | 43.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mathilde Johansson | Catalina Castano | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #232 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #110 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #140 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #144 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2007 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #134 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #194 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2008 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #85 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #135 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2009 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #125 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #113 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2010 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #102 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #57 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2011 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #77 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #54 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2012 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #87 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #112 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2013 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #136 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #142 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #207 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #173 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #189 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #254 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #232 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |