H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Mathilde Johansson vs Stéphanie Dubois H2H: 1-0
Mathilde Johansson holds a 1–0 lead over Stéphanie Dubois in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mathilde Johansson leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mathilde Johansson won the 2013 Bogota third round 6-4 2-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 41
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 39
Right-Handed
162 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2013* | Bogota | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Mathilde Johansson | 6-4 2-6 6-3 | Stéphanie Dubois | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mathilde Johansson | #235 | #59 | 992 | 1,619 | 44 | 75 | 37.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Stéphanie Dubois | #352 | #87 | 757 | 1,569 | 23 | 61 | 27.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mathilde Johansson | Stéphanie Dubois | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #225 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #133 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #121 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #106 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #140 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #122 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2007 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #134 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #105 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2008 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #85 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #156 | 1,420 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2009 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #125 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #97 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2010 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #102 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #140 | 1,430 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2011 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #77 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #206 | 1,393 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2012 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #87 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #352 | 1,381 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2013 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #136 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #207 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #173 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |