H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Maureen Drake vs Andrea Temesvari H2H: 1-0

Maureen Drake holds a 1–0 lead over Andrea Temesvari in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Maureen Drake leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Maureen Drake won the 1993 Brisbane International round of 64 5-7 7-5 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Maureen Drake
CAN Age 55 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Andrea Temesvari
HUN Age 60 Right-Handed 182 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Maureen Drake #184 5-7 7-5 6-3 Andrea Temesvari #93 Match data Jan 6, 1993* R64 Brisbane International Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Maureen Drake #1,132 #47 612 1,586 40 93 30.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Andrea Temesvari #932 #7 109 2,021 185 179 50.8% 0 0 0 1 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Maureen Drake Andrea Temesvari
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1981 11–6 64.7% — 1,624 0 1
16 — — — — — — — 1982 18–14 56.2% — 1,770 0 1
17 1988 2–4 33.3% #275 1,497 0 0 1983 42–15 73.7% — 1,989 0 4
18 1989 3–5 37.5% #163 1,505 0 0 1984 24–16 60.0% #14 1,889 0 4
19 1990 1–5 16.7% #209 1,463 0 0 1985 18–12 60.0% #16 1,848 0 5
20 1991 1–3 25.0% #198 1,451 0 0 1986 11–12 47.8% #43 1,801 0 5
21 1992 0–5 0.0% #188 1,412 0 0 1987 1–2 33.3% #193 1,775 0 5
22 1993 3–10 23.1% #171 1,416 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 1994 1–3 25.0% #170 1,411 0 0 1989 18–15 54.5% #43 1,750 0 5
24 1995 2–2 50.0% #165 1,455 0 0 1990 8–19 29.6% #117 1,611 0 5
25 1996 1–5 16.7% #173 1,432 0 0 1991 6–14 30.0% #159 1,542 0 5
26 1997 0–1 0.0% #159 1,423 0 0 1992 11–12 47.8% #70 1,607 0 5
27 1998 0–1 0.0% #130 1,412 0 0 1993 5–20 20.0% #153 1,475 0 5
28 1999 12–15 44.4% #57 1,554 0 0 1994 2–7 22.2% #133 1,476 0 5
29 2000 5–12 29.4% #147 1,503 0 0 1995 6–8 42.9% #90 1,485 0 5
30 2001 1–3 25.0% #161 1,493 0 0 1996 4–6 40.0% #181 1,532 0 5
31 2002 4–6 40.0% #99 1,519 0 0 1997 0–1 0.0% #940 1,528 0 5
32 2003 3–8 27.3% #115 1,500 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 2004 0–4 0.0% #191 1,460 0 0 — — — — — — —
34 2005 1–1 50.0% #278 1,466 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Maureen Drake Andrea Temesvari
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 3 3 6 50.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
17 1988 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1983 2 2 4 50.0% 29 5 34 85.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 9 7 16 56.3%
18 1989 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1984 5 3 8 62.5% 10 6 16 62.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 5 9 44.4%
19 1990 0 4 4 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1985 7 3 10 70.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
20 1991 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1986 6 5 11 54.5% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0%
21 1992 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1993 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1994 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1989 9 7 16 56.3% 8 5 13 61.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 1995 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1 7 8 12.5% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
25 1996 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 2 5 7 28.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
26 1997 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 4 4 8 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
27 1998 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1993 3 9 12 25.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
28 1999 8 9 17 47.1% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1994 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2000 4 6 10 40.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1995 1 2 3 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1996 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — —
31 2002 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1997 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 2003 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2004 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2005 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 23 57 80 28.8% 8 18 26 30.8% 5 11 16 31.2% 4 7 11 36.4% — 44 57 101 43.6% 89 62 151 58.9% 15 15 30 50.0% 26 43 69 37.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Maureen Drake Andrea Temesvari
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1624 130.8 — — — — — — — 60.5% +0.97 3–1 (75%) 0–2 — +0.26
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1771 146.3 — — — — -152 -30 -161 59.2% +0.69 3–6 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 100.6 -2.86
17 1988 1498 102.4 — — — — +27 — — 35.7% -1.07 1–1 0–1 — -0.20 1983 1989 163.0 — — — — -215 +103 -366 75.4% +2.16 4–4 (50%) 3–3 (50%) 101.7 +1.64
18 1989 1505 108.3 — — — — +37 — — 38.9% -0.78 1–1 1–1 — +0.46 1984 1889 136.5 — — — — -78 +109 -173 61.2% +0.68 5–4 (56%) 6–2 (75%) 105.3 +3.39
19 1990 1464 106.0 — — — — +29 — — 26.7% -1.87 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — +0.61 1985 1849 136.4 — — — — -49 +129 — 61.5% +0.86 3–4 (43%) 4–4 (50%) 95.7 +1.35
20 1991 1451 96.1 — — — — +36 — — 30.0% -1.80 1–1 — — +0.35 1986 1802 139.4 — — — — -40 +157 — 55.1% +0.29 2–5 (29%) 2–3 (40%) 94.1 -1.37
21 1992 1413 99.9 — — — — +25 — — 16.7% -2.25 0–2 — — +0.07 1987 1776 105.3 — — — — -40 — — 42.9% -1.29 0–1 — — -0.17
22 1993 1416 110.2 — — — — +28 — — 30.0% -1.30 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1994 1412 100.5 — — — — +30 — — 30.0% -1.10 1–1 0–1 — +0.13 1989 1751 135.2 — — — — -31 +153 — 50.0% -0.01 7–3 (70%) 5–6 (45%) 102.1 -0.26
24 1995 1455 122.0 — — — — +21 — — 42.9% -0.14 0–1 0–2 — -0.19 1990 1612 121.4 — — — — +8 +190 — 34.5% -1.48 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 98.1 +0.21
25 1996 1433 102.9 — — — — +40 — — 21.4% -1.71 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.04 1991 1542 110.6 — — — — +7 +224 +66 36.4% -1.34 0–4 (0%) 1–4 (20%) 92.0 +0.26
26 1997 1424 99.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.01 1992 1607 122.1 — — — — -5 +82 +65 41.5% -0.70 7–2 (78%) 3–3 (50%) 106.9 +0.25
27 1998 1413 103.2 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.01 1993 1476 111.1 — — — — +31 +134 — 28.8% -1.37 3–5 (38%) 2–4 (33%) 97.7 +0.66
28 1999 1555 130.6 — — — — +12 -37 -32 45.0% -0.32 3–3 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 102.7 +0.23 1994 1477 113.1 — — — — +1 +154 — 27.8% -1.83 1–1 — — -0.25
29 2000 1503 118.0 — — — — +70 -25 — 34.2% -0.97 1–3 (25%) 3–3 (50%) 98.9 +0.30 1995 1486 104.6 — — — — -22 +124 — 43.8% -0.38 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 100.7 +1.71
30 2001 1494 98.3 — — — — — — -13 33.3% -0.89 0–1 0–1 — +0.11 1996 1532 128.1 — — — — — +113 — 45.5% -0.36 0–2 1–2 (33%) — -0.42
31 2002 1519 116.5 — — — — +20 — -7 48.0% -0.12 1–4 (20%) 1–3 (25%) 95.6 +0.14 1997 1529 108.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — -0.29
32 2003 1501 105.5 -0.96 -1.21 0.910 48.8% -7 -23 — 35.7% -0.93 2–4 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 97.8 +0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2004 1461 95.4 -2.78 -1.48 0.811 45.3% -19 — — 11.1% -2.78 0–1 — — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2005 1467 97.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.50 — — — +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1586 118.4 -1.69 -1.32 0.868 47.4% +26 -30 -16 35.1% -1.00 14–30 (32%) 10–24 (29%) 89.2 +1.56 — 2021 143.3 — — — — -57 +117 -110 52.6% +0.18 42–48 (47%) 33–38 (46%) 97.5 +1.14

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.