H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Maureen Drake vs Angelica Gavaldon H2H: 0-1

Angelica Gavaldon holds a 1–0 lead over Maureen Drake in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Angelica Gavaldon leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Angelica Gavaldon won the 1993 Key Biscayne round of 128 7-5 3-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Maureen Drake

CAN Age 55 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H

0 – 1

1 main-draw meetings

Angelica Gavaldon

MEX Age 52 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

Player	Score	Player	Match Data	Date	Round	Tournament	Category	Surface
Angelica Gavaldon #85	7-5 3-6 6-3	Maureen Drake #144	Match data	Mar 13, 1993*	R128	Key Biscayne	Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000	Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player	Current	Peak	Pts	Elo	W	L	Win %	GS	1000 including documented historical predecessor categories	Finals	500 including documented historical predecessor categories	250 including documented historical predecessor categories	Titles
Maureen Drake	#1,132	#47	612	1,586	40	93	30.1%	0	0	0	0	0	0
Angelica Gavaldon	#434	#34	237	1,735	75	111	40.3%	0	0	0	0	0	0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age	Maureen Drake							Angelica Gavaldon
Age	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles
14	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1988	1–3	25.0%	#264	1,499	0	0
15	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1989	2–4	33.3%	#191	1,501	0	0
16	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1990	16–16	50.0%	#51	1,601	0	0
17	1988	2–4	33.3%	#275	1,497	0	0	1991	1–6	14.3%	#242	1,556	0	0
18	1989	3–5	37.5%	#163	1,505	0	0	1992	5–10	33.3%	#142	1,577	0	0
19	1990	1–5	16.7%	#209	1,463	0	0	1993	19–20	48.7%	#64	1,613	0	0
20	1991	1–3	25.0%	#198	1,451	0	0	1994	9–16	36.0%	#119	1,605	0	0
21	1992	0–5	0.0%	#188	1,412	0	0	1995	17–17	50.0%	#36	1,677	0	0
22	1993	3–10	23.1%	#171	1,416	0	0	1996	3–11	21.4%	#219	1,593	0	0
23	1994	1–3	25.0%	#170	1,411	0	0	1997	1–5	16.7%	#107	1,527	0	0
24	1995	2–2	50.0%	#165	1,455	0	0	1998	0–1	0.0%	#697	1,521	0	0
25	1996	1–5	16.7%	#173	1,432	0	0	1999	0–1	0.0%	#379	1,515	0	0
26	1997	0–1	0.0%	#159	1,423	0	0	2000	1–1	50.0%	#261	1,526	0	0
27	1998	0–1	0.0%	#130	1,412	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
28	1999	12–15	44.4%	#57	1,554	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
29	2000	5–12	29.4%	#147	1,503	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
30	2001	1–3	25.0%	#161	1,493	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
31	2002	4–6	40.0%	#99	1,519	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
32	2003	3–8	27.3%	#115	1,500	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
33	2004	0–4	0.0%	#191	1,460	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
34	2005	1–1	50.0%	#278	1,466	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age	Maureen Drake																	Angelica Gavaldon
	Yr	Hard				Clay				Grass				Carpet				Yr	Hard				Clay				Grass				Carpet
	Yr	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	Yr	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %
14	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1988	1	2	3	33.3%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%
15	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1989	2	4	6	33.3%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
16	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1990	13	10	23	56.5%	1	3	4	25.0%	2	3	5	40.0%	—	—	—	—
17	1988	2	3	5	40.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%	1991	1	5	6	16.7%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%
18	1989	3	4	7	42.9%	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1992	3	6	9	33.3%	2	3	5	40.0%	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%
19	1990	0	4	4	0.0%	1	1	2	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1993	12	11	23	52.2%	4	4	8	50.0%	1	2	3	33.3%	2	3	5	40.0%
20	1991	1	2	3	33.3%	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1994	7	9	16	43.8%	2	4	6	33.3%	0	1	1	0.0%	0	2	2	0.0%
21	1992	0	5	5	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1995	12	9	21	57.1%	3	5	8	37.5%	2	2	4	50.0%	0	1	1	0.0%
22	1993	2	6	8	25.0%	0	2	2	0.0%	—	—	—	—	1	2	3	33.3%	1996	3	10	13	23.1%	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—
23	1994	0	2	2	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1	1	2	50.0%	1997	0	2	2	0.0%	1	2	3	33.3%	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%
24	1995	2	2	4	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1998	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
25	1996	1	2	3	33.3%	—	—	—	—	0	2	2	0.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	1999	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
26	1997	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	2000	1	1	2	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
27	1998	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
28	1999	8	9	17	47.1%	3	4	7	42.9%	1	2	3	33.3%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
29	2000	4	6	10	40.0%	1	5	6	16.7%	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
30	2001	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	1	2	3	33.3%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
31	2002	0	2	2	0.0%	1	1	2	50.0%	2	2	4	50.0%	1	1	2	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
32	2003	0	4	4	0.0%	1	2	3	33.3%	1	1	2	50.0%	1	1	2	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
33	2004	0	4	4	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
34	2005	—	—	—	—	1	1	2	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Career	—	23	57	80	28.8%	8	18	26	30.8%	5	11	16	31.2%	4	7	11	36.4%	—	55	71	126	43.7%	13	21	34	38.2%	5	9	14	35.7%	2	10	12	16.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age	Maureen Drake																Angelica Gavaldon
Age	Yr	Elo	P+	Serve+	Return+	PD	TPW%	Hard Elo	Clay Elo	Grass Elo	Set Win %	Set Margin	Dec. Set	Tiebreak	Pressure+	Schedule	Yr	Elo	P+	Serve+	Return+	PD	TPW%	Hard Elo	Clay Elo	Grass Elo	Set Win %	Set Margin	Dec. Set	Tiebreak	Pressure+	Schedule
14	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1988	1500	105.9	—	—	—	—	+36	—	—	33.3%	-1.44	0–1	0–1	—	+0.09
15	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1989	1501	104.0	—	—	—	—	+24	—	—	35.7%	-1.14	1–1	1–0	—	+0.22
16	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1990	1601	123.4	—	—	—	—	+41	-70	-31	48.0%	-0.39	7–4 (64%)	2–2 (50%)	105.8	+1.11
17	1988	1498	102.4	—	—	—	—	+27	—	—	35.7%	-1.07	1–1	0–1	—	-0.20	1991	1557	107.9	—	—	—	—	+21	—	—	23.5%	-1.59	1–2 (33%)	1–1	—	-0.31
18	1989	1505	108.3	—	—	—	—	+37	—	—	38.9%	-0.78	1–1	1–1	—	+0.46	1992	1578	119.9	—	—	—	—	-6	-9	—	29.0%	-1.29	2–1 (67%)	2–3 (40%)	100.5	-0.47
19	1990	1464	106.0	—	—	—	—	+29	—	—	26.7%	-1.87	1–2 (33%)	0–1	—	+0.61	1993	1613	127.0	—	—	—	—	+4	-19	-41	49.4%	-0.03	5–6 (45%)	3–4 (43%)	99.4	+0.85
20	1991	1451	96.1	—	—	—	—	+36	—	—	30.0%	-1.80	1–1	—	—	+0.35	1994	1605	119.4	—	—	—	—	+7	-4	—	35.3%	-0.88	3–0 (100%)	1–6 (14%)	100.2	-0.02
21	1992	1413	99.9	—	—	—	—	+25	—	—	16.7%	-2.25	0–2	—	—	+0.07	1995	1678	132.9	—	—	—	—	0	-76	-137	48.6%	-0.23	4–2 (67%)	4–1 (80%)	106.9	+0.35
22	1993	1416	110.2	—	—	—	—	+28	—	—	30.0%	-1.30	1–3 (25%)	0–1	—	-0.21	1996	1593	116.6	—	—	—	—	+13	—	—	25.8%	-1.71	1–2 (33%)	0–3 (0%)	96.1	-0.12
23	1994	1412	100.5	—	—	—	—	+30	—	—	30.0%	-1.10	1–1	0–1	—	+0.13	1997	1528	94.3	—	—	—	—	+25	+52	—	28.6%	-1.79	0–2	—	—	+0.66
24	1995	1455	122.0	—	—	—	—	+21	—	—	42.9%	-0.14	0–1	0–2	—	-0.19	1998	1522	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	-0.13
25	1996	1433	102.9	—	—	—	—	+40	—	—	21.4%	-1.71	1–1	1–2 (33%)	—	+0.04	1999	1515	100.4	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0.0%	-4.50	—	—	—	-0.20
26	1997	1424	99.5	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0.0%	-3.00	—	0–1	—	+0.01	2000	1526	104.3	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	40.0%	-1.40	1–0	—	—	+0.09
27	1998	1413	103.2	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	33.3%	-1.33	0–1	—	—	+0.01	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
28	1999	1555	130.6	—	—	—	—	+12	-37	-32	45.0%	-0.32	3–3 (50%)	3–4 (43%)	102.7	+0.23	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
29	2000	1503	118.0	—	—	—	—	+70	-25	—	34.2%	-0.97	1–3 (25%)	3–3 (50%)	98.9	+0.30	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
30	2001	1494	98.3	—	—	—	—	—	—	-13	33.3%	-0.89	0–1	0–1	—	+0.11	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
31	2002	1519	116.5	—	—	—	—	+20	—	-7	48.0%	-0.12	1–4 (20%)	1–3 (25%)	95.6	+0.14	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
32	2003	1501	105.5	-0.96	-1.21	0.910	48.8%	-7	-23	—	35.7%	-0.93	2–4 (33%)	1–3 (25%)	97.8	+0.08	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
33	2004	1461	95.4	-2.78	-1.48	0.811	45.3%	-19	—	—	11.1%	-2.78	0–1	—	—	+0.03	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
34	2005	1467	97.0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	50.0%	-0.50	—	—	—	+0.11	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Career	—	1586	118.4	-1.69	-1.32	0.868	47.4%	+26	-30	-16	35.1%	-1.00	14–30 (32%)	10–24 (29%)	89.2	+1.56	—	1735	127.2	—	—	—	—	+13	-28	-69	41.0%	-0.69	25–21 (54%)	14–21 (40%)	101.4	+1.14

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.

Maureen Drake's most-played WTA rivals
Opponent	W	L	M	Last Played	H2H
Amanda Coetzer	0	4	4	May 31, 2000	H2H
Tamarine Tanasugarn	1	2	3	Jan 15, 2003	H2H
Anne Kremer	2	1	3	Sep 19, 2002	H2H
Dominique Monami	0	3	3	Sep 1, 1999	H2H
Magui Serna	0	2	2	Sep 1, 2004	H2H

Angelica Gavaldon's most-played WTA rivals
Opponent	W	L	M	Last Played	H2H
Gigi Fernandez	2	3	5	Aug 4, 1994	H2H
Rosalyn Fairbank	2	2	4	Jun 30, 1995	H2H
Judith Wiesner	0	4	4	May 25, 1995	H2H
Joannette Kruger	2	1	3	Jan 21, 1998	H2H
Gabriela Sabatini	0	3	3	Jul 28, 1996	H2H