H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Maureen Drake vs Ann Grossman H2H: 0-1

Ann Grossman holds a 1–0 lead over Maureen Drake in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ann Grossman leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ann Grossman won the 1989 Canadian Open round of 64 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Maureen Drake
CAN Age 55 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Ann Grossman
USA Age 55 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ann Grossman #46 6-4 6-2 Maureen Drake #223 Match data Aug 23, 1989* R64 Canadian Open WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Maureen Drake #1,132 #47 612 1,586 40 93 30.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ann Grossman #343 #29 384 1,887 187 185 50.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Maureen Drake Ann Grossman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1987 0–1 0.0% #378 1,497 0 0
17 1988 2–4 33.3% #275 1,497 0 0 1988 15–12 55.6% #48 1,699 0 0
18 1989 3–5 37.5% #163 1,505 0 0 1989 23–20 53.5% #54 1,736 0 0
19 1990 1–5 16.7% #209 1,463 0 0 1990 23–22 51.1% #50 1,748 0 0
20 1991 1–3 25.0% #198 1,451 0 0 1991 12–19 38.7% #89 1,638 0 0
21 1992 0–5 0.0% #188 1,412 0 0 1992 23–17 57.5% #36 1,733 0 0
22 1993 3–10 23.1% #171 1,416 0 0 1993 30–19 61.2% #35 1,804 0 0
23 1994 1–3 25.0% #170 1,411 0 0 1994 27–21 56.2% #37 1,853 0 0
24 1995 2–2 50.0% #165 1,455 0 0 1995 12–19 38.7% #88 1,681 0 0
25 1996 1–5 16.7% #173 1,432 0 0 1996 10–14 41.7% #72 1,665 0 0
26 1997 0–1 0.0% #159 1,423 0 0 1997 10–17 37.0% #75 1,615 0 0
27 1998 0–1 0.0% #130 1,412 0 0 1998 2–4 33.3% #283 1,595 0 0
28 1999 12–15 44.4% #57 1,554 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2000 5–12 29.4% #147 1,503 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2001 1–3 25.0% #161 1,493 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2002 4–6 40.0% #99 1,519 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2003 3–8 27.3% #115 1,500 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 2004 0–4 0.0% #191 1,460 0 0 — — — — — — —
34 2005 1–1 50.0% #278 1,466 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Maureen Drake Ann Grossman
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1988 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1988 13 11 24 54.2% — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
18 1989 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1989 16 11 27 59.3% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1990 0 4 4 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1990 9 12 21 42.9% 12 7 19 63.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
20 1991 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1991 4 11 15 26.7% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1992 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 15 8 23 65.2% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0%
22 1993 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1993 21 12 33 63.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
23 1994 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1994 16 10 26 61.5% 9 7 16 56.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0%
24 1995 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 5 10 15 33.3% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
25 1996 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 8 9 17 47.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 1997 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 3 9 12 25.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 1998 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1998 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
28 1999 8 9 17 47.1% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2000 4 6 10 40.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2002 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2003 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2004 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2005 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 23 57 80 28.8% 8 18 26 30.8% 5 11 16 31.2% 4 7 11 36.4% — 111 106 217 51.2% 59 56 115 51.3% 6 9 15 40.0% 11 14 25 44.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Maureen Drake Ann Grossman
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1497 101.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.15
17 1988 1498 102.4 — — — — +27 — — 35.7% -1.07 1–1 0–1 — -0.20 1988 1699 133.9 — — — — +28 — — 54.1% +0.13 4–3 (57%) 0–5 (0%) 100.1 +0.16
18 1989 1505 108.3 — — — — +37 — — 38.9% -0.78 1–1 1–1 — +0.46 1989 1737 136.2 — — — — +43 -89 — 52.5% +0.05 8–7 (53%) 4–5 (44%) 101.2 -1.22
19 1990 1464 106.0 — — — — +29 — — 26.7% -1.87 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — +0.61 1990 1749 136.3 — — — — -12 +8 — 51.0% +0.02 7–7 (50%) 2–4 (33%) — -1.48
20 1991 1451 96.1 — — — — +36 — — 30.0% -1.80 1–1 — — +0.35 1991 1638 126.7 — — — — -16 +89 — 44.3% +0.06 3–7 (30%) 2–6 (25%) 91.9 +0.49
21 1992 1413 99.9 — — — — +25 — — 16.7% -2.25 0–2 — — +0.07 1992 1733 132.9 — — — — +24 -9 — 52.9% -0.03 6–3 (67%) 6–1 (86%) 108.7 +1.73
22 1993 1416 110.2 — — — — +28 — — 30.0% -1.30 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — -0.21 1993 1805 140.5 — — — — +9 -60 — 59.6% +0.62 6–7 (46%) 6–3 (67%) 103.6 +0.77
23 1994 1412 100.5 — — — — +30 — — 30.0% -1.10 1–1 0–1 — +0.13 1994 1853 146.2 — — — — 0 -73 -249 53.6% -0.01 10–6 (63%) 5–2 (71%) 107.3 -1.02
24 1995 1455 122.0 — — — — +21 — — 42.9% -0.14 0–1 0–2 — -0.19 1995 1681 123.7 — — — — +38 +44 — 40.8% -0.46 4–5 (44%) 3–9 (25%) 92.7 +0.33
25 1996 1433 102.9 — — — — +40 — — 21.4% -1.71 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.04 1996 1666 130.2 — — — — +49 +8 — 42.9% -0.62 4–4 (50%) 0–2 — -0.99
26 1997 1424 99.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.01 1997 1615 123.7 — — — — +26 +98 — 38.6% -1.25 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 97.1 -0.41
27 1998 1413 103.2 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.01 1998 1595 103.2 — — — — +41 +76 — 33.3% -1.58 — 1–0 — +0.11
28 1999 1555 130.6 — — — — +12 -37 -32 45.0% -0.32 3–3 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 102.7 +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2000 1503 118.0 — — — — +70 -25 — 34.2% -0.97 1–3 (25%) 3–3 (50%) 98.9 +0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2001 1494 98.3 — — — — — — -13 33.3% -0.89 0–1 0–1 — +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2002 1519 116.5 — — — — +20 — -7 48.0% -0.12 1–4 (20%) 1–3 (25%) 95.6 +0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2003 1501 105.5 -0.96 -1.21 0.910 48.8% -7 -23 — 35.7% -0.93 2–4 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 97.8 +0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2004 1461 95.4 -2.78 -1.48 0.811 45.3% -19 — — 11.1% -2.78 0–1 — — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2005 1467 97.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.50 — — — +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1586 118.4 -1.69 -1.32 0.868 47.4% +26 -30 -16 35.1% -1.00 14–30 (32%) 10–24 (29%) 89.2 +1.56 — 1888 140.3 — — — — +18 +6 -249 49.9% -0.10 53–53 (50%) 31–39 (44%) 99.5 -0.45

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.