H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Maureen Drake vs Annabel Ellwood H2H: 1-0

Maureen Drake holds a 1–0 lead over Annabel Ellwood in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Maureen Drake leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Maureen Drake won the 1999 Hobart International round of 32 7-6 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Maureen Drake
CAN Age 55 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Annabel Ellwood
AUS Age 48 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Maureen Drake #127 7-6 6-1 Annabel Ellwood #129 Match data Jan 14, 1999* R32 Hobart International Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Maureen Drake #1,132 #47 612 1,586 40 93 30.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Annabel Ellwood #1,021 #57 398 1,573 18 54 25.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Maureen Drake Annabel Ellwood
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1988 2–4 33.3% #275 1,497 0 0 1995 4–6 40.0% #129 1,523 0 0
18 1989 3–5 37.5% #163 1,505 0 0 1996 2–9 18.2% #105 1,472 0 0
19 1990 1–5 16.7% #209 1,463 0 0 1997 8–19 29.6% #99 1,425 0 0
20 1991 1–3 25.0% #198 1,451 0 0 1998 3–5 37.5% #138 1,456 0 0
21 1992 0–5 0.0% #188 1,412 0 0 1999 0–5 0.0% #105 1,405 0 0
22 1993 3–10 23.1% #171 1,416 0 0 2000 0–4 0.0% #210 1,384 0 0
23 1994 1–3 25.0% #170 1,411 0 0 2001 1–5 16.7% #169 1,360 0 0
24 1995 2–2 50.0% #165 1,455 0 0 2002 0–1 0.0% #1021 1,351 0 0
25 1996 1–5 16.7% #173 1,432 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 1997 0–1 0.0% #159 1,423 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 1998 0–1 0.0% #130 1,412 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 1999 12–15 44.4% #57 1,554 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2000 5–12 29.4% #147 1,503 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2001 1–3 25.0% #161 1,493 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2002 4–6 40.0% #99 1,519 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2003 3–8 27.3% #115 1,500 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 2004 0–4 0.0% #191 1,460 0 0 — — — — — — —
34 2005 1–1 50.0% #278 1,466 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Maureen Drake Annabel Ellwood
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1988 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1995 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1989 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1996 2 7 9 22.2% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
19 1990 0 4 4 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1997 8 11 19 42.1% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1991 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1998 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1992 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1993 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 2000 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 1994 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2001 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1995 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1996 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1997 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1998 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1999 8 9 17 47.1% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2000 4 6 10 40.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2002 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2003 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2004 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2005 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 23 57 80 28.8% 8 18 26 30.8% 5 11 16 31.2% 4 7 11 36.4% — 18 41 59 30.5% 0 8 8 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Maureen Drake Annabel Ellwood
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1988 1498 102.4 — — — — +27 — — 35.7% -1.07 1–1 0–1 — -0.20 1995 1524 110.9 — — — — +44 — — 40.9% -0.91 1–1 0–1 — -0.07
18 1989 1505 108.3 — — — — +37 — — 38.9% -0.78 1–1 1–1 — +0.46 1996 1473 113.7 — — — — +46 — — 24.0% -1.20 1–2 (33%) — — +0.16
19 1990 1464 106.0 — — — — +29 — — 26.7% -1.87 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — +0.61 1997 1425 111.7 — — — — +94 +51 — 37.5% -0.77 2–8 (20%) 2–5 (29%) 91.2 +1.48
20 1991 1451 96.1 — — — — +36 — — 30.0% -1.80 1–1 — — +0.35 1998 1457 109.8 — — — — +67 — — 36.8% -1.16 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — +0.20
21 1992 1413 99.9 — — — — +25 — — 16.7% -2.25 0–2 — — +0.07 1999 1405 95.7 — — — — +55 — — 16.7% -2.42 0–2 0–1 — +0.24
22 1993 1416 110.2 — — — — +28 — — 30.0% -1.30 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — -0.21 2000 1384 104.5 — — — — +60 — — 20.0% -2.30 0–2 — — -0.31
23 1994 1412 100.5 — — — — +30 — — 30.0% -1.10 1–1 0–1 — +0.13 2001 1361 97.4 — — — — +42 — — 37.5% -0.87 0–4 (0%) 0–2 — +0.43
24 1995 1455 122.0 — — — — +21 — — 42.9% -0.14 0–1 0–2 — -0.19 2002 1352 94.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.06
25 1996 1433 102.9 — — — — +40 — — 21.4% -1.71 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1997 1424 99.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1998 1413 103.2 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1999 1555 130.6 — — — — +12 -37 -32 45.0% -0.32 3–3 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 102.7 +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2000 1503 118.0 — — — — +70 -25 — 34.2% -0.97 1–3 (25%) 3–3 (50%) 98.9 +0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2001 1494 98.3 — — — — — — -13 33.3% -0.89 0–1 0–1 — +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2002 1519 116.5 — — — — +20 — -7 48.0% -0.12 1–4 (20%) 1–3 (25%) 95.6 +0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2003 1501 105.5 -0.96 -1.21 0.910 48.8% -7 -23 — 35.7% -0.93 2–4 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 97.8 +0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2004 1461 95.4 -2.78 -1.48 0.811 45.3% -19 — — 11.1% -2.78 0–1 — — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2005 1467 97.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.50 — — — +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1586 118.4 -1.69 -1.32 0.868 47.4% +26 -30 -16 35.1% -1.00 14–30 (32%) 10–24 (29%) 89.2 +1.56 — 1573 111.0 — — — — +66 +51 — 32.9% -1.15 6–20 (23%) 2–10 (17%) 85.0 +3.04

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.