H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Maureen Drake vs Anne Minter H2H: 1-0

Maureen Drake holds a 1–0 lead over Anne Minter in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Maureen Drake leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Maureen Drake won the 1989 Key Biscayne round of 128 6-1 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Maureen Drake
CAN Age 55 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Anne Minter
AUS Age 63 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Maureen Drake #313 6-1 6-3 Anne Minter #30 Match data Mar 21, 1989* R128 Key Biscayne WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Maureen Drake #1,132 #47 612 1,586 40 93 30.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Anne Minter #554 #23 35 1,870 220 224 49.5% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Maureen Drake Anne Minter
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1979 1–1 50.0% — 1,502 0 0
17 1988 2–4 33.3% #275 1,497 0 0 1980 9–4 69.2% — 1,628 0 0
18 1989 3–5 37.5% #163 1,505 0 0 1981 7–9 43.8% — 1,622 0 1
19 1990 1–5 16.7% #209 1,463 0 0 1982 5–13 27.8% — 1,604 0 1
20 1991 1–3 25.0% #198 1,451 0 0 1983 12–23 34.3% — 1,592 0 1
21 1992 0–5 0.0% #188 1,412 0 0 1984 21–21 50.0% #43 1,704 0 1
22 1993 3–10 23.1% #171 1,416 0 0 1985 21–25 45.7% #46 1,700 0 1
23 1994 1–3 25.0% #170 1,411 0 0 1986 11–17 39.3% #75 1,639 0 1
24 1995 2–2 50.0% #165 1,455 0 0 1987 32–20 61.5% #38 1,792 0 3
25 1996 1–5 16.7% #173 1,432 0 0 1988 38–22 63.3% #25 1,817 0 4
26 1997 0–1 0.0% #159 1,423 0 0 1989 27–17 61.4% #34 1,785 0 5
27 1998 0–1 0.0% #130 1,412 0 0 1990 17–22 43.6% #88 1,695 0 5
28 1999 12–15 44.4% #57 1,554 0 0 1991 19–21 47.5% #61 1,693 0 5
29 2000 5–12 29.4% #147 1,503 0 0 1992 0–6 0.0% #443 1,578 0 5
30 2001 1–3 25.0% #161 1,493 0 0 1993 0–3 0.0% #554 1,544 0 5
31 2002 4–6 40.0% #99 1,519 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2003 3–8 27.3% #115 1,500 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 2004 0–4 0.0% #191 1,460 0 0 — — — — — — —
34 2005 1–1 50.0% #278 1,466 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Maureen Drake Anne Minter
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
17 1988 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1980 — — — — — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
18 1989 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1981 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1990 0 4 4 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1982 1 2 3 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1991 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1983 5 9 14 35.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
21 1992 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 10 7 17 58.8% 2 6 8 25.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 1993 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1985 9 9 18 50.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
23 1994 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1986 9 11 20 45.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0%
24 1995 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 18 9 27 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 6 11 45.5% 5 2 7 71.4%
25 1996 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1988 24 14 38 63.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7%
26 1997 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 23 12 35 65.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1998 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1990 8 14 22 36.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 4 8 50.0%
28 1999 8 9 17 47.1% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1991 12 16 28 42.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
29 2000 4 6 10 40.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1992 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 3 3 0.0%
30 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1993 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
31 2002 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2003 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2004 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2005 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 23 57 80 28.8% 8 18 26 30.8% 5 11 16 31.2% 4 7 11 36.4% — 119 108 227 52.4% 25 36 61 41.0% 58 53 111 52.3% 12 25 37 32.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Maureen Drake Anne Minter
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1502 102.4 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.25 — — — +0.59
17 1988 1498 102.4 — — — — +27 — — 35.7% -1.07 1–1 0–1 — -0.20 1980 1628 118.1 — — — — — — -11 58.1% +0.68 5–0 (100%) 1–1 — +0.31
18 1989 1505 108.3 — — — — +37 — — 38.9% -0.78 1–1 1–1 — +0.46 1981 1623 117.7 — — — — — -35 +16 44.7% -0.21 3–3 (50%) 1–1 — +0.54
19 1990 1464 106.0 — — — — +29 — — 26.7% -1.87 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — +0.61 1982 1605 106.0 — — — — -77 -89 +5 34.1% -0.98 3–5 (38%) 1–1 — -0.48
20 1991 1451 96.1 — — — — +36 — — 30.0% -1.80 1–1 — — +0.35 1983 1593 108.2 — — — — -86 -47 +21 39.0% -0.73 4–10 (29%) 4–7 (36%) 95.0 +1.89
21 1992 1413 99.9 — — — — +25 — — 16.7% -2.25 0–2 — — +0.07 1984 1704 128.8 — — — — -75 -187 +11 49.0% +0.33 9–7 (56%) 5–5 (50%) 104.3 +1.23
22 1993 1416 110.2 — — — — +28 — — 30.0% -1.30 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — -0.21 1985 1700 129.3 — — — — -90 -132 +46 43.7% -0.49 8–5 (62%) 8–4 (67%) 106.0 -1.82
23 1994 1412 100.5 — — — — +30 — — 30.0% -1.10 1–1 0–1 — +0.13 1986 1640 120.6 — — — — -39 — +132 39.3% -0.54 3–4 (43%) 1–4 (20%) 96.1 -0.13
24 1995 1455 122.0 — — — — +21 — — 42.9% -0.14 0–1 0–2 — -0.19 1987 1793 139.4 — — — — +33 -215 -70 58.5% +0.45 11–8 (58%) 6–1 (86%) 106.7 +2.98
25 1996 1433 102.9 — — — — +40 — — 21.4% -1.71 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.04 1988 1818 139.8 — — — — +5 -217 +6 59.0% +0.69 11–7 (61%) 4–3 (57%) 100.8 +3.74
26 1997 1424 99.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.01 1989 1786 133.9 — — — — +33 — -14 60.4% +0.72 6–7 (46%) 4–1 (80%) 98.4 +3.98
27 1998 1413 103.2 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.01 1990 1695 126.1 — — — — -20 — +113 46.0% -0.08 3–6 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 95.0 +0.69
28 1999 1555 130.6 — — — — +12 -37 -32 45.0% -0.32 3–3 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 102.7 +0.23 1991 1694 129.3 — — — — -45 -36 +106 49.5% -0.25 4–7 (36%) 3–5 (38%) 95.8 -0.42
29 2000 1503 118.0 — — — — +70 -25 — 34.2% -0.97 1–3 (25%) 3–3 (50%) 98.9 +0.30 1992 1579 94.3 — — — — -44 — — 14.3% -2.29 0–2 0–1 — +0.85
30 2001 1494 98.3 — — — — — — -13 33.3% -0.89 0–1 0–1 — +0.11 1993 1545 93.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.07
31 2002 1519 116.5 — — — — +20 — -7 48.0% -0.12 1–4 (20%) 1–3 (25%) 95.6 +0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2003 1501 105.5 -0.96 -1.21 0.910 48.8% -7 -23 — 35.7% -0.93 2–4 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 97.8 +0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2004 1461 95.4 -2.78 -1.48 0.811 45.3% -19 — — 11.1% -2.78 0–1 — — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2005 1467 97.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.50 — — — +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1586 118.4 -1.69 -1.32 0.868 47.4% +26 -30 -16 35.1% -1.00 14–30 (32%) 10–24 (29%) 89.2 +1.56 — 1871 132.4 — — — — -22 -124 +20 49.2% 0.00 70–71 (50%) 40–37 (52%) 102.3 +3.13

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.