H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Maureen Drake vs Asa Carlsson H2H: 0-1
Asa Carlsson holds a 1–0 lead over Maureen Drake in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Asa Carlsson leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Asa Carlsson won the 2000 Madrid fourth round 6-2 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CAN
Age 55
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
SWE
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 2000* | Madrid | WTA 500 | R16 | Clay | Asa Carlsson | 6-2 6-0 | Maureen Drake | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maureen Drake | #1,132 | #47 | 612 | 1,586 | 40 | 93 | 30.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Asa Carlsson | #1,024 | #28 | 831 | 1,816 | 128 | 171 | 42.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Maureen Drake | Asa Carlsson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1988 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #275 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #163 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #164 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #209 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #70 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #198 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #49 | 1,748 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,412 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #39 | 1,737 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #171 | 1,415 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #45 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #170 | 1,411 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #92 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #165 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #61 | 1,662 | 0 | 1 |
| 1996 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #173 | 1,432 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #57 | 1,634 | 0 | 1 |
| 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #159 | 1,423 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 6–21 | 22.2% | #102 | 1,515 | 0 | 1 |
| 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #130 | 1,412 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #78 | 1,571 | 0 | 2 |
| 1999 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #57 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #345 | 1,496 | 0 | 2 |
| 2000 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #147 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #207 | 1,465 | 0 | 2 |
| 2001 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #161 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2002 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #99 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2003 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #115 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #278 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |