H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Maureen Drake vs Ginger Helgeson H2H: 0-2

Ginger Helgeson holds a 2–0 lead over Maureen Drake in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Ginger Helgeson leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ginger Helgeson won the 1993 Canadian Open round of 64 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Maureen Drake

CAN Age 55 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H

0 – 2

2 main-draw meetings

Ginger Helgeson

USA Age 57 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

Player	Score	Player	Match Data	Date	Round	Tournament	Category	Surface
Ginger Helgeson #45	6-3 6-2	Maureen Drake #151	Match data	Aug 18, 1993*	R64	Canadian Open	Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000	Hard
Ginger Helgeson #66	4-6 6-2 6-2	Maureen Drake #146	Match data	Mar 31, 1993*	R64	Hilton Head	Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000	Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player	Current	Peak	Pts	Elo	W	L	Win %	GS	1000 including documented historical predecessor categories	Finals	500 including documented historical predecessor categories	250 including documented historical predecessor categories	Titles
Maureen Drake	#1,132	#47	612	1,586	40	93	30.1%	0	0	0	0	0	0
Ginger Helgeson	#467	#29	246	1,865	94	95	49.7%	0	0	0	0	1	1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age	Maureen Drake							Ginger Helgeson
Age	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles
17	1988	2–4	33.3%	#275	1,497	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
18	1989	3–5	37.5%	#163	1,505	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
19	1990	1–5	16.7%	#209	1,463	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
20	1991	1–3	25.0%	#198	1,451	0	0	1989	0–2	0.0%	#239	1,485	0	0
21	1992	0–5	0.0%	#188	1,412	0	0	1990	1–2	33.3%	#246	1,498	0	0
22	1993	3–10	23.1%	#171	1,416	0	0	1991	17–17	50.0%	#58	1,647	0	0
23	1994	1–3	25.0%	#170	1,411	0	0	1992	12–15	44.4%	#71	1,648	0	0
24	1995	2–2	50.0%	#165	1,455	0	0	1993	22–20	52.4%	#54	1,736	0	0
25	1996	1–5	16.7%	#173	1,432	0	0	1994	29–17	63.0%	#30	1,777	0	1
26	1997	0–1	0.0%	#159	1,423	0	0	1995	8–7	53.3%	#111	1,772	0	1
27	1998	0–1	0.0%	#130	1,412	0	0	1996	0–2	0.0%	#792	1,721	0	1
28	1999	12–15	44.4%	#57	1,554	0	0	1997	3–8	27.3%	#167	1,639	0	1
29	2000	5–12	29.4%	#147	1,503	0	0	1998	2–5	28.6%	#152	1,572	0	1
30	2001	1–3	25.0%	#161	1,493	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
31	2002	4–6	40.0%	#99	1,519	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
32	2003	3–8	27.3%	#115	1,500	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
33	2004	0–4	0.0%	#191	1,460	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
34	2005	1–1	50.0%	#278	1,466	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age	Maureen Drake																	Ginger Helgeson
	Yr	Hard				Clay				Grass				Carpet				Yr	Hard				Clay				Grass				Carpet
	Yr	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	Yr	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %
17	1988	2	3	5	40.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
18	1989	3	4	7	42.9%	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
19	1990	0	4	4	0.0%	1	1	2	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
20	1991	1	2	3	33.3%	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1989	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%
21	1992	0	5	5	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1990	—	—	—	—	1	1	2	50.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—
22	1993	2	6	8	25.0%	0	2	2	0.0%	—	—	—	—	1	2	3	33.3%	1991	9	7	16	56.3%	8	6	14	57.1%	0	2	2	0.0%	0	2	2	0.0%
23	1994	0	2	2	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1	1	2	50.0%	1992	8	9	17	47.1%	2	3	5	40.0%	1	2	3	33.3%	1	1	2	50.0%
24	1995	2	2	4	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1993	11	9	20	55.0%	7	5	12	58.3%	3	3	6	50.0%	1	3	4	25.0%
25	1996	1	2	3	33.3%	—	—	—	—	0	2	2	0.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	1994	20	9	29	69.0%	7	5	12	58.3%	2	2	4	50.0%	0	1	1	0.0%
26	1997	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1995	5	5	10	50.0%	3	2	5	60.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
27	1998	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	1996	0	1	1	0.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
28	1999	8	9	17	47.1%	3	4	7	42.9%	1	2	3	33.3%	—	—	—	—	1997	0	6	6	0.0%	—	—	—	—	3	2	5	60.0%	—	—	—	—
29	2000	4	6	10	40.0%	1	5	6	16.7%	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	1998	2	3	5	40.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—
30	2001	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	1	2	3	33.3%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
31	2002	0	2	2	0.0%	1	1	2	50.0%	2	2	4	50.0%	1	1	2	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
32	2003	0	4	4	0.0%	1	2	3	33.3%	1	1	2	50.0%	1	1	2	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
33	2004	0	4	4	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
34	2005	—	—	—	—	1	1	2	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Career	—	23	57	80	28.8%	8	18	26	30.8%	5	11	16	31.2%	4	7	11	36.4%	—	55	50	105	52.4%	28	24	52	53.8%	9	13	22	40.9%	2	8	10	20.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age	Maureen Drake																Ginger Helgeson
Age	Yr	Elo	P+	Serve+	Return+	PD	TPW%	Hard Elo	Clay Elo	Grass Elo	Set Win %	Set Margin	Dec. Set	Tiebreak	Pressure+	Schedule	Yr	Elo	P+	Serve+	Return+	PD	TPW%	Hard Elo	Clay Elo	Grass Elo	Set Win %	Set Margin	Dec. Set	Tiebreak	Pressure+	Schedule
17	1988	1498	102.4	—	—	—	—	+27	—	—	35.7%	-1.07	1–1	0–1	—	-0.20	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
18	1989	1505	108.3	—	—	—	—	+37	—	—	38.9%	-0.78	1–1	1–1	—	+0.46	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
19	1990	1464	106.0	—	—	—	—	+29	—	—	26.7%	-1.87	1–2 (33%)	0–1	—	+0.61	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
20	1991	1451	96.1	—	—	—	—	+36	—	—	30.0%	-1.80	1–1	—	—	+0.35	1989	1486	104.0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0.0%	-2.75	—	0–1	—	+0.02
21	1992	1413	99.9	—	—	—	—	+25	—	—	16.7%	-2.25	0–2	—	—	+0.07	1990	1498	100.1	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	28.6%	-2.00	1–0	—	—	-0.32
22	1993	1416	110.2	—	—	—	—	+28	—	—	30.0%	-1.30	1–3 (25%)	0–1	—	-0.21	1991	1647	138.4	—	—	—	—	-14	+44	—	48.1%	-0.22	6–3 (67%)	5–5 (50%)	106.2	-1.02
23	1994	1412	100.5	—	—	—	—	+30	—	—	30.0%	-1.10	1–1	0–1	—	+0.13	1992	1649	128.8	—	—	—	—	+13	+33	-159	48.5%	-0.17	4–8 (33%)	6–3 (67%)	98.8	+0.26
24	1995	1455	122.0	—	—	—	—	+21	—	—	42.9%	-0.14	0–1	0–2	—	-0.19	1993	1737	139.0	—	—	—	—	-44	-4	-162	52.6%	+0.62	7–6 (54%)	1–2 (33%)	—	-0.91
25	1996	1433	102.9	—	—	—	—	+40	—	—	21.4%	-1.71	1–1	1–2 (33%)	—	+0.04	1994	1777	146.6	—	—	—	—	+6	-21	-203	61.0%	+0.87	5–3 (63%)	4–1 (80%)	104.6	+1.21
26	1997	1424	99.5	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0.0%	-3.00	—	0–1	—	+0.01	1995	1773	137.3	—	—	—	—	-13	+12	—	60.0%	+0.67	0–4 (0%)	0–2	—	-0.56
27	1998	1413	103.2	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	33.3%	-1.33	0–1	—	—	+0.01	1996	1721	92.9	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0.0%	-3.50	—	0–1	—	+0.20
28	1999	1555	130.6	—	—	—	—	+12	-37	-32	45.0%	-0.32	3–3 (50%)	3–4 (43%)	102.7	+0.23	1997	1639	107.6	—	—	—	—	-14	—	-6	30.4%	-1.22	0–1	—	—	-0.15
29	2000	1503	118.0	—	—	—	—	+70	-25	—	34.2%	-0.97	1–3 (25%)	3–3 (50%)	98.9	+0.30	1998	1573	99.1	—	—	—	—	+16	—	—	41.2%	-0.71	0–3 (0%)	2–2 (50%)	94.9	+1.00
30	2001	1494	98.3	—	—	—	—	—	—	-13	33.3%	-0.89	0–1	0–1	—	+0.11	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
31	2002	1519	116.5	—	—	—	—	+20	—	-7	48.0%	-0.12	1–4 (20%)	1–3 (25%)	95.6	+0.14	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
32	2003	1501	105.5	-0.96	-1.21	0.910	48.8%	-7	-23	—	35.7%	-0.93	2–4 (33%)	1–3 (25%)	97.8	+0.08	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
33	2004	1461	95.4	-2.78	-1.48	0.811	45.3%	-19	—	—	11.1%	-2.78	0–1	—	—	+0.03	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
34	2005	1467	97.0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	50.0%	-0.50	—	—	—	+0.11	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Career	—	1586	118.4	-1.69	-1.32	0.868	47.4%	+26	-30	-16	35.1%	-1.00	14–30 (32%)	10–24 (29%)	89.2	+1.56	—	1865	140.4	—	—	—	—	-9	+11	-127	50.6%	+0.14	23–28 (45%)	18–17 (51%)	99.4	-0.14

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.

Maureen Drake's most-played WTA rivals
Opponent	W	L	M	Last Played	H2H
Amanda Coetzer	0	4	4	May 31, 2000	H2H
Tamarine Tanasugarn	1	2	3	Jan 15, 2003	H2H
Anne Kremer	2	1	3	Sep 19, 2002	H2H
Dominique Monami	0	3	3	Sep 1, 1999	H2H
Magui Serna	0	2	2	Sep 1, 2004	H2H

Ginger Helgeson's most-played WTA rivals
Opponent	W	L	M	Last Played	H2H
Conchita Martínez	1	6	7	Sep 4, 1994	H2H
Helena Sukova	1	4	5	Jan 8, 1992	H2H
Chanda Rubin	1	3	4	Jun 24, 1998	H2H
Amanda Coetzer	0	4	4	Apr 6, 1995	H2H
Steffi Graf	0	4	4	Mar 19, 1995	H2H