H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Maureen Drake vs Ginger Helgeson H2H: 0-2
Ginger Helgeson holds a 2–0 lead over Maureen Drake in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Ginger Helgeson leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ginger Helgeson won the 1993 Montreal second round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CAN
Age 55
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 18, 1993* | Montreal | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Ginger Helgeson | 6-3 6-2 | Maureen Drake | Match data |
| Mar 31, 1993* | Hilton Head | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Ginger Helgeson | 4-6 6-2 6-2 | Maureen Drake | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maureen Drake | #1,132 | #47 | 612 | 1,586 | 40 | 93 | 30.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ginger Helgeson | #467 | #29 | 246 | 1,865 | 94 | 95 | 49.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Maureen Drake | Ginger Helgeson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1988 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #275 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #239 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #163 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #246 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #209 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #198 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #71 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,412 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #54 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #171 | 1,415 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #30 | 1,777 | 0 | 1 |
| 1994 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #170 | 1,411 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #111 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 |
| 1995 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #165 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #792 | 1,717 | 0 | 1 |
| 1996 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #173 | 1,432 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #167 | 1,636 | 0 | 1 |
| 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #159 | 1,423 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #152 | 1,570 | 0 | 1 |
| 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #130 | 1,412 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1999 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #57 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2000 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #147 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2001 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #161 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2002 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #99 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2003 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #115 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #278 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |