H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Maureen Drake vs Gretchen Magers H2H: 0-1

Gretchen Magers holds a 1–0 lead over Maureen Drake in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Gretchen Magers leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Gretchen Magers won the 1988 Wellington round of 32 6-1 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Maureen Drake
CAN Age 55 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Gretchen Magers
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Gretchen Magers #73 6-1 7-6 Maureen Drake #262 Match data Feb 4, 1988* R32 Wellington WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Maureen Drake #1,132 #47 612 1,586 40 93 30.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Gretchen Magers #433 #3 40 1,905 152 127 54.5% 0 0 0 1 3 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Maureen Drake Gretchen Magers
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1988 2–4 33.3% #275 1,497 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1989 3–5 37.5% #163 1,505 0 0 1982 4–1 80.0% — 1,608 0 0
19 1990 1–5 16.7% #209 1,463 0 0 1983 9–6 60.0% — 1,689 0 1
20 1991 1–3 25.0% #198 1,451 0 0 1984 8–7 53.3% #81 1,706 0 1
21 1992 0–5 0.0% #188 1,412 0 0 1985 1–5 16.7% #3 1,644 0 1
22 1993 3–10 23.1% #171 1,416 0 0 1986 6–8 42.9% #70 1,666 0 1
23 1994 1–3 25.0% #170 1,411 0 0 1987 21–17 55.3% #52 1,713 0 2
24 1995 2–2 50.0% #165 1,455 0 0 1988 31–20 60.8% #43 1,756 0 3
25 1996 1–5 16.7% #173 1,432 0 0 1989 40–24 62.5% #29 1,891 0 4
26 1997 0–1 0.0% #159 1,423 0 0 1990 22–19 53.7% #35 1,771 0 4
27 1998 0–1 0.0% #130 1,412 0 0 1991 10–15 40.0% #114 1,649 0 4
28 1999 12–15 44.4% #57 1,554 0 0 1992 0–5 0.0% #390 1,591 0 4
29 2000 5–12 29.4% #147 1,503 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2001 1–3 25.0% #161 1,493 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2002 4–6 40.0% #99 1,519 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2003 3–8 27.3% #115 1,500 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 2004 0–4 0.0% #191 1,460 0 0 — — — — — — —
34 2005 1–1 50.0% #278 1,466 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Maureen Drake Gretchen Magers
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1988 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1989 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1982 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1990 0 4 4 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1983 1 3 4 25.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
20 1991 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1984 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
21 1992 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
22 1993 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1986 5 4 9 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1994 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1987 11 5 16 68.8% 5 5 10 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 1995 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 22 12 34 64.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 1996 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 19 12 31 61.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 9 5 14 64.3%
26 1997 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 5 6 11 45.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 10 4 14 71.4% 3 4 7 42.9%
27 1998 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1991 7 10 17 41.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1999 8 9 17 47.1% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1992 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2000 4 6 10 40.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2002 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2003 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2004 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2005 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 23 57 80 28.8% 8 18 26 30.8% 5 11 16 31.2% 4 7 11 36.4% — 77 58 135 57.0% 28 27 55 50.9% 30 25 55 54.5% 16 17 33 48.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Maureen Drake Gretchen Magers
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1988 1498 102.4 — — — — +27 — — 35.7% -1.07 1–1 0–1 — -0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1989 1505 108.3 — — — — +37 — — 38.9% -0.78 1–1 1–1 — +0.46 1982 1608 127.4 — — — — +80 — — 64.3% +0.43 3–1 (75%) 1–0 — -0.37
19 1990 1464 106.0 — — — — +29 — — 26.7% -1.87 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — +0.61 1983 1690 116.7 — — — — -22 -1 — 52.8% -0.08 5–1 (83%) 0–1 — +0.82
20 1991 1451 96.1 — — — — +36 — — 30.0% -1.80 1–1 — — +0.35 1984 1707 119.6 — — — — -54 — -40 51.4% 0.00 3–4 (43%) 1–0 — -0.42
21 1992 1413 99.9 — — — — +25 — — 16.7% -2.25 0–2 — — +0.07 1985 1644 103.2 — — — — — -40 — 16.7% -2.17 — — — -0.32
22 1993 1416 110.2 — — — — +28 — — 30.0% -1.30 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — -0.21 1986 1667 123.6 — — — — -7 — — 40.6% -0.56 3–3 (50%) 2–0 — -0.81
23 1994 1412 100.5 — — — — +30 — — 30.0% -1.10 1–1 0–1 — +0.13 1987 1713 137.3 — — — — +20 -82 -75 56.1% +0.48 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.78
24 1995 1455 122.0 — — — — +21 — — 42.9% -0.14 0–1 0–2 — -0.19 1988 1757 133.2 — — — — +16 -60 -137 57.6% +0.58 10–6 (63%) 10–7 (59%) 107.1 +2.74
25 1996 1433 102.9 — — — — +40 — — 21.4% -1.71 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.04 1989 1891 149.4 — — — — -10 -129 -183 58.3% +0.65 12–6 (67%) 9–8 (53%) 106.1 -1.97
26 1997 1424 99.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.01 1990 1771 138.9 — — — — -17 -8 +111 53.2% +0.10 6–8 (43%) 8–3 (73%) 102.8 -1.04
27 1998 1413 103.2 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.01 1991 1650 122.9 — — — — +25 — +165 44.1% -0.27 3–6 (33%) 0–6 (0%) 90.1 +2.03
28 1999 1555 130.6 — — — — +12 -37 -32 45.0% -0.32 3–3 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 102.7 +0.23 1992 1591 98.0 — — — — +23 — — 9.1% -2.55 0–1 0–1 — -0.47
29 2000 1503 118.0 — — — — +70 -25 — 34.2% -0.97 1–3 (25%) 3–3 (50%) 98.9 +0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2001 1494 98.3 — — — — — — -13 33.3% -0.89 0–1 0–1 — +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2002 1519 116.5 — — — — +20 — -7 48.0% -0.12 1–4 (20%) 1–3 (25%) 95.6 +0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2003 1501 105.5 -0.96 -1.21 0.910 48.8% -7 -23 — 35.7% -0.93 2–4 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 97.8 +0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2004 1461 95.4 -2.78 -1.48 0.811 45.3% -19 — — 11.1% -2.78 0–1 — — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2005 1467 97.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.50 — — — +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1586 118.4 -1.69 -1.32 0.868 47.4% +26 -30 -16 35.1% -1.00 14–30 (32%) 10–24 (29%) 89.2 +1.56 — 1906 140.6 — — — — +3 -59 -17 52.7% +0.20 47–40 (54%) 33–27 (55%) 106.7 -0.21

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.