H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Maureen Drake vs Isabelle Demongeot H2H: 0-1

Isabelle Demongeot holds a 1–0 lead over Maureen Drake in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Isabelle Demongeot leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Isabelle Demongeot won the 1996 Birmingham round of 64 7-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Maureen Drake
CAN Age 55 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Isabelle Demongeot
FRA Age 59 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Isabelle Demongeot #153 7-6 6-3 Maureen Drake #159 Match data Jun 12, 1996* R64 Birmingham Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Maureen Drake #1,132 #47 612 1,586 40 93 30.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Isabelle Demongeot #522 #35 69 1,841 119 157 43.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Maureen Drake Isabelle Demongeot
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1988 2–4 33.3% #275 1,497 0 0 1984 1–1 50.0% #165 1,513 0 0
18 1989 3–5 37.5% #163 1,505 0 0 1985 4–7 36.4% #135 1,520 0 0
19 1990 1–5 16.7% #209 1,463 0 0 1986 11–15 42.3% #65 1,608 0 0
20 1991 1–3 25.0% #198 1,451 0 0 1987 17–20 45.9% #53 1,732 0 0
21 1992 0–5 0.0% #188 1,412 0 0 1988 19–19 50.0% #45 1,759 0 0
22 1993 3–10 23.1% #171 1,416 0 0 1989 18–15 54.5% #46 1,766 0 0
23 1994 1–3 25.0% #170 1,411 0 0 1990 15–17 46.9% #78 1,687 0 0
24 1995 2–2 50.0% #165 1,455 0 0 1991 13–14 48.1% #63 1,683 0 1
25 1996 1–5 16.7% #173 1,432 0 0 1992 7–17 29.2% #136 1,626 0 1
26 1997 0–1 0.0% #159 1,423 0 0 1993 5–11 31.2% #150 1,592 0 1
27 1998 0–1 0.0% #130 1,412 0 0 1994 3–9 25.0% #130 1,541 0 1
28 1999 12–15 44.4% #57 1,554 0 0 1995 5–9 35.7% #160 1,546 0 1
29 2000 5–12 29.4% #147 1,503 0 0 1996 1–3 25.0% #242 1,529 0 1
30 2001 1–3 25.0% #161 1,493 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2002 4–6 40.0% #99 1,519 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2003 3–8 27.3% #115 1,500 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 2004 0–4 0.0% #191 1,460 0 0 — — — — — — —
34 2005 1–1 50.0% #278 1,466 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Maureen Drake Isabelle Demongeot
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1988 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1989 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1985 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1990 0 4 4 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1986 3 3 6 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 6 8 25.0%
20 1991 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1987 7 8 15 46.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9%
21 1992 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 5 8 13 38.5% 11 5 16 68.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
22 1993 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1989 11 9 20 55.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
23 1994 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1990 11 10 21 52.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
24 1995 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 10 8 18 55.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
25 1996 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 3 11 14 21.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 1997 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 4 6 10 40.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 1998 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1994 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
28 1999 8 9 17 47.1% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1995 2 2 4 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2000 4 6 10 40.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
30 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2002 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2003 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2004 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2005 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 23 57 80 28.8% 8 18 26 30.8% 5 11 16 31.2% 4 7 11 36.4% — 58 70 128 45.3% 30 43 73 41.1% 19 23 42 45.2% 12 21 33 36.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Maureen Drake Isabelle Demongeot
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1988 1498 102.4 — — — — +27 — — 35.7% -1.07 1–1 0–1 — -0.20 1984 1514 102.8 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.50 — — — +0.09
18 1989 1505 108.3 — — — — +37 — — 38.9% -0.78 1–1 1–1 — +0.46 1985 1520 106.0 — — — — — +7 +100 36.4% -0.95 — — — +0.76
19 1990 1464 106.0 — — — — +29 — — 26.7% -1.87 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — +0.61 1986 1609 129.8 — — — — -40 -65 +53 45.8% -0.20 2–5 (29%) 2–5 (29%) 96.1 +0.38
20 1991 1451 96.1 — — — — +36 — — 30.0% -1.80 1–1 — — +0.35 1987 1732 140.6 — — — — -56 -238 +22 45.2% -0.20 6–4 (60%) 0–1 — -0.92
21 1992 1413 99.9 — — — — +25 — — 16.7% -2.25 0–2 — — +0.07 1988 1759 143.5 — — — — -71 -64 -55 53.9% +0.18 5–10 (33%) 4–1 (80%) 100.3 -3.79
22 1993 1416 110.2 — — — — +28 — — 30.0% -1.30 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — -0.21 1989 1766 145.5 — — — — -4 -36 -73 53.3% +0.31 5–4 (56%) 4–3 (57%) 101.0 -3.59
23 1994 1412 100.5 — — — — +30 — — 30.0% -1.10 1–1 0–1 — +0.13 1990 1688 134.0 — — — — +77 -6 — 43.5% -0.58 5–4 (56%) 3–1 (75%) 103.7 -1.98
24 1995 1455 122.0 — — — — +21 — — 42.9% -0.14 0–1 0–2 — -0.19 1991 1683 123.3 — — — — +67 -79 — 52.5% -0.12 2–5 (29%) 6–1 (86%) 98.5 +0.46
25 1996 1433 102.9 — — — — +40 — — 21.4% -1.71 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.04 1992 1626 122.8 — — — — -19 -17 +52 32.7% -0.90 1–3 (25%) 3–3 (50%) 96.6 -1.74
26 1997 1424 99.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.01 1993 1593 116.2 — — — — +3 -6 — 33.3% -1.23 4–3 (57%) 1–0 — -0.63
27 1998 1413 103.2 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.01 1994 1542 110.1 — — — — +37 +40 — 29.6% -1.11 1–2 (33%) 0–3 (0%) 95.9 +0.54
28 1999 1555 130.6 — — — — +12 -37 -32 45.0% -0.32 3–3 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 102.7 +0.23 1995 1547 116.6 — — — — +52 -12 +36 38.7% -0.45 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -0.04
29 2000 1503 118.0 — — — — +70 -25 — 34.2% -0.97 1–3 (25%) 3–3 (50%) 98.9 +0.30 1996 1530 101.6 — — — — — — — 25.0% -1.88 — 1–0 — +0.15
30 2001 1494 98.3 — — — — — — -13 33.3% -0.89 0–1 0–1 — +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2002 1519 116.5 — — — — +20 — -7 48.0% -0.12 1–4 (20%) 1–3 (25%) 95.6 +0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2003 1501 105.5 -0.96 -1.21 0.910 48.8% -7 -23 — 35.7% -0.93 2–4 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 97.8 +0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2004 1461 95.4 -2.78 -1.48 0.811 45.3% -19 — — 11.1% -2.78 0–1 — — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2005 1467 97.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.50 — — — +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1586 118.4 -1.69 -1.32 0.868 47.4% +26 -30 -16 35.1% -1.00 14–30 (32%) 10–24 (29%) 89.2 +1.56 — 1842 138.1 — — — — +1 -50 +21 44.7% -0.34 32–42 (43%) 24–19 (56%) 99.7 -3.75

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.