H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Maureen Drake vs Lisa Oneill H2H: 1-1

Maureen Drake and Lisa Oneill are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Lisa Oneill won the 1990 ASB Classic round of 32 6-3 3-6 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Maureen Drake
CAN Age 55 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Lisa Oneill
AUS

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lisa Oneill 6-3 3-6 6-1 Maureen Drake #162 Match data Feb 1, 1990* R32 ASB Classic Tier V → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Maureen Drake #262 6-2 1-6 7-5 Lisa Oneill Match data Feb 3, 1988* R64 Wellington WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Maureen Drake #1,132 #47 612 1,586 40 93 30.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lisa Oneill — — — 1,500 11 26 29.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Maureen Drake Lisa Oneill
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1988 2–4 33.3% #275 1,497 0 0 1985 1–3 25.0% — 1,470 0 0
1989 3–5 37.5% #163 1,505 0 0 1986 2–2 50.0% — 1,484 0 0
1990 1–5 16.7% #209 1,463 0 0 1987 2–5 28.6% — 1,459 0 0
1991 1–3 25.0% #198 1,451 0 0 1988 3–10 23.1% — 1,410 0 0
1992 0–5 0.0% #188 1,412 0 0 1989 2–4 33.3% — 1,417 0 0
1993 3–10 23.1% #171 1,416 0 0 1990 1–2 33.3% — 1,426 0 0
1994 1–3 25.0% #170 1,411 0 0 — — — — — — —
1995 2–2 50.0% #165 1,455 0 0 — — — — — — —
1996 1–5 16.7% #173 1,432 0 0 — — — — — — —
1997 0–1 0.0% #159 1,423 0 0 — — — — — — —
1998 0–1 0.0% #130 1,412 0 0 — — — — — — —
1999 12–15 44.4% #57 1,554 0 0 — — — — — — —
2000 5–12 29.4% #147 1,503 0 0 — — — — — — —
2001 1–3 25.0% #161 1,493 0 0 — — — — — — —
2002 4–6 40.0% #99 1,519 0 0 — — — — — — —
2003 3–8 27.3% #115 1,500 0 0 — — — — — — —
2004 0–4 0.0% #191 1,460 0 0 — — — — — — —
2005 1–1 50.0% #278 1,466 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Maureen Drake Lisa Oneill
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1988 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1985 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
1989 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1986 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
1990 0 4 4 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1987 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
1991 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1988 1 4 5 20.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
1992 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
1993 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1990 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
1994 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1995 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1996 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1997 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1998 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1999 8 9 17 47.1% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2000 4 6 10 40.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2002 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2003 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2004 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2005 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 23 57 80 28.8% 8 18 26 30.8% 5 11 16 31.2% 4 7 11 36.4% Career 6 12 18 33.3% 2 8 10 20.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Maureen Drake Lisa Oneill
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1988 1498 102.4 — — — — +27 — — 35.7% -1.07 1–1 0–1 — -0.20 1985 1470 98.5 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.60 0–2 0–1 — +0.16
1989 1505 108.3 — — — — +37 — — 38.9% -0.78 1–1 1–1 — +0.46 1986 1484 102.5 — — — — — — — 50.0% 0.00 — — — +0.60
1990 1464 106.0 — — — — +29 — — 26.7% -1.87 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — +0.61 1987 1460 98.3 — — — — +87 — — 31.3% -0.81 1–1 0–1 — +0.95
1991 1451 96.1 — — — — +36 — — 30.0% -1.80 1–1 — — +0.35 1988 1410 93.8 — — — — +74 +45 +120 32.3% -1.26 1–4 (20%) 0–1 — +0.71
1992 1413 99.9 — — — — +25 — — 16.7% -2.25 0–2 — — +0.07 1989 1417 98.4 — — — — +67 — — 38.5% -1.77 0–1 1–0 — +0.60
1993 1416 110.2 — — — — +28 — — 30.0% -1.30 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — -0.21 1990 1426 104.8 — — — — +63 — — 44.4% -0.56 1–2 (33%) — — +0.07
1994 1412 100.5 — — — — +30 — — 30.0% -1.10 1–1 0–1 — +0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1995 1455 122.0 — — — — +21 — — 42.9% -0.14 0–1 0–2 — -0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1996 1433 102.9 — — — — +40 — — 21.4% -1.71 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1997 1424 99.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1998 1413 103.2 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1999 1555 130.6 — — — — +12 -37 -32 45.0% -0.32 3–3 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 102.7 +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2000 1503 118.0 — — — — +70 -25 — 34.2% -0.97 1–3 (25%) 3–3 (50%) 98.9 +0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2001 1494 98.3 — — — — — — -13 33.3% -0.89 0–1 0–1 — +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2002 1519 116.5 — — — — +20 — -7 48.0% -0.12 1–4 (20%) 1–3 (25%) 95.6 +0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2003 1501 105.5 -0.96 -1.21 0.910 48.8% -7 -23 — 35.7% -0.93 2–4 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 97.8 +0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2004 1461 95.4 -2.78 -1.48 0.811 45.3% -19 — — 11.1% -2.78 0–1 — — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2005 1467 97.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.50 — — — +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 1586 118.4 -1.69 -1.32 0.868 47.4% +26 -30 -16 35.1% -1.00 14–30 (32%) 10–24 (29%) 89.2 +1.56 Career 1500 97.9 — — — — +72 +45 +120 36.8% -0.99 3–10 (23%) 1–3 (25%) 92.0 +8.35

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.