H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Maureen Drake vs Naoko Sawamatsu H2H: 0-1

Naoko Sawamatsu holds a 1–0 lead over Maureen Drake in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Naoko Sawamatsu leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Naoko Sawamatsu won the 1992 Canadian Open round of 64 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Maureen Drake

CAN Age 55 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H

0 – 1

1 main-draw meetings

Naoko Sawamatsu

JPN Age 53 Right-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

Player	Score	Player	Match Data	Date	Round	Tournament	Category	Surface
Naoko Sawamatsu #30	6-4 6-3	Maureen Drake #205	Match data	Aug 19, 1992*	R64	Canadian Open	Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000	Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player	Current	Peak	Pts	Elo	W	L	Win %	GS	1000 including documented historical predecessor categories	Finals	500 including documented historical predecessor categories	250 including documented historical predecessor categories	Titles
Maureen Drake	#1,132	#47	612	1,586	40	93	30.1%	0	0	0	0	0	0
Naoko Sawamatsu	#266	#14	881	1,970	183	129	58.7%	0	0	0	0	4	4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age	Maureen Drake							Naoko Sawamatsu
Age	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles
16	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1989	0–2	0.0%	#262	1,477	0	0
17	1988	2–4	33.3%	#275	1,497	0	0	1990	14–6	70.0%	#31	1,669	0	1
18	1989	3–5	37.5%	#163	1,505	0	0	1991	21–16	56.8%	#33	1,723	0	1
19	1990	1–5	16.7%	#209	1,463	0	0	1992	23–13	63.9%	#24	1,856	0	1
20	1991	1–3	25.0%	#198	1,451	0	0	1993	24–13	64.9%	#28	1,853	0	2
21	1992	0–5	0.0%	#188	1,412	0	0	1994	24–12	66.7%	#26	1,870	0	3
22	1993	3–10	23.1%	#171	1,416	0	0	1995	22–13	62.9%	#17	1,847	0	3
23	1994	1–3	25.0%	#170	1,411	0	0	1996	19–17	52.8%	#38	1,811	0	3
24	1995	2–2	50.0%	#165	1,455	0	0	1997	24–19	55.8%	#34	1,849	0	4
25	1996	1–5	16.7%	#173	1,432	0	0	1998	12–18	40.0%	#55	1,721	0	4
26	1997	0–1	0.0%	#159	1,423	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
27	1998	0–1	0.0%	#130	1,412	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
28	1999	12–15	44.4%	#57	1,554	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
29	2000	5–12	29.4%	#147	1,503	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
30	2001	1–3	25.0%	#161	1,493	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
31	2002	4–6	40.0%	#99	1,519	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
32	2003	3–8	27.3%	#115	1,500	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
33	2004	0–4	0.0%	#191	1,460	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
34	2005	1–1	50.0%	#278	1,466	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age	Maureen Drake																	Naoko Sawamatsu
	Yr	Hard				Clay				Grass				Carpet				Yr	Hard				Clay				Grass				Carpet
	Yr	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	Yr	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %
16	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1989	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%
17	1988	2	3	5	40.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%	1990	13	3	16	81.3%	1	1	2	50.0%	0	2	2	0.0%	—	—	—	—
18	1989	3	4	7	42.9%	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1991	13	10	23	56.5%	7	3	10	70.0%	1	2	3	33.3%	0	1	1	0.0%
19	1990	0	4	4	0.0%	1	1	2	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1992	13	7	20	65.0%	5	4	9	55.6%	3	1	4	75.0%	2	1	3	66.7%
20	1991	1	2	3	33.3%	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1993	12	8	20	60.0%	7	2	9	77.8%	4	2	6	66.7%	1	1	2	50.0%
21	1992	0	5	5	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1994	15	7	22	68.2%	5	3	8	62.5%	4	2	6	66.7%	—	—	—	—
22	1993	2	6	8	25.0%	0	2	2	0.0%	—	—	—	—	1	2	3	33.3%	1995	14	8	22	63.6%	4	3	7	57.1%	2	1	3	66.7%	2	1	3	66.7%
23	1994	0	2	2	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1	1	2	50.0%	1996	11	11	22	50.0%	4	3	7	57.1%	2	2	4	50.0%	2	1	3	66.7%
24	1995	2	2	4	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1997	20	12	32	62.5%	0	3	3	0.0%	2	2	4	50.0%	2	2	4	50.0%
25	1996	1	2	3	33.3%	—	—	—	—	0	2	2	0.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	1998	6	10	16	37.5%	3	5	8	37.5%	2	2	4	50.0%	1	1	2	50.0%
26	1997	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
27	1998	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
28	1999	8	9	17	47.1%	3	4	7	42.9%	1	2	3	33.3%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
29	2000	4	6	10	40.0%	1	5	6	16.7%	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
30	2001	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	1	2	3	33.3%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
31	2002	0	2	2	0.0%	1	1	2	50.0%	2	2	4	50.0%	1	1	2	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
32	2003	0	4	4	0.0%	1	2	3	33.3%	1	1	2	50.0%	1	1	2	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
33	2004	0	4	4	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
34	2005	—	—	—	—	1	1	2	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Career	—	23	57	80	28.8%	8	18	26	30.8%	5	11	16	31.2%	4	7	11	36.4%	—	117	77	194	60.3%	36	27	63	57.1%	20	16	36	55.6%	10	9	19	52.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age	Maureen Drake																Naoko Sawamatsu
Age	Yr	Elo	P+	Serve+	Return+	PD	TPW%	Hard Elo	Clay Elo	Grass Elo	Set Win %	Set Margin	Dec. Set	Tiebreak	Pressure+	Schedule	Yr	Elo	P+	Serve+	Return+	PD	TPW%	Hard Elo	Clay Elo	Grass Elo	Set Win %	Set Margin	Dec. Set	Tiebreak	Pressure+	Schedule
16	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1989	1477	96.0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	20.0%	-2.20	0–1	—	—	+0.30
17	1988	1498	102.4	—	—	—	—	+27	—	—	35.7%	-1.07	1–1	0–1	—	-0.20	1990	1669	124.7	—	—	—	—	+57	—	—	62.5%	+0.77	6–2 (75%)	5–1 (83%)	110.2	+1.75
18	1989	1505	108.3	—	—	—	—	+37	—	—	38.9%	-0.78	1–1	1–1	—	+0.46	1991	1724	133.2	—	—	—	—	-8	-44	-170	55.4%	+0.49	5–6 (45%)	1–1	—	+2.14
19	1990	1464	106.0	—	—	—	—	+29	—	—	26.7%	-1.87	1–2 (33%)	0–1	—	+0.61	1992	1857	143.8	—	—	—	—	-17	-155	-248	60.7%	+0.42	7–5 (58%)	4–2 (67%)	104.0	-0.25
20	1991	1451	96.1	—	—	—	—	+36	—	—	30.0%	-1.80	1–1	—	—	+0.35	1993	1853	139.0	—	—	—	—	-68	-33	-152	62.1%	+0.86	7–6 (54%)	2–0	—	+0.17
21	1992	1413	99.9	—	—	—	—	+25	—	—	16.7%	-2.25	0–2	—	—	+0.07	1994	1871	146.2	—	—	—	—	-20	-58	-130	60.7%	+1.00	9–3 (75%)	4–3 (57%)	106.5	-0.99
22	1993	1416	110.2	—	—	—	—	+28	—	—	30.0%	-1.30	1–3 (25%)	0–1	—	-0.21	1995	1848	150.6	—	—	—	—	+59	-74	-92	58.6%	+0.48	10–7 (59%)	6–3 (67%)	103.1	+1.09
23	1994	1412	100.5	—	—	—	—	+30	—	—	30.0%	-1.10	1–1	0–1	—	+0.13	1996	1812	145.0	—	—	—	—	+5	+4	-6	53.2%	+0.02	5–6 (45%)	3–2 (60%)	97.8	-0.27
24	1995	1455	122.0	—	—	—	—	+21	—	—	42.9%	-0.14	0–1	0–2	—	-0.19	1997	1850	153.6	—	—	—	—	+44	-92	-62	54.0%	+0.35	10–6 (63%)	5–5 (50%)	103.9	-1.59
25	1996	1433	102.9	—	—	—	—	+40	—	—	21.4%	-1.71	1–1	1–2 (33%)	—	+0.04	1998	1721	125.2	—	—	—	—	+37	-25	+64	40.5%	-0.62	8–6 (57%)	1–1	—	-0.88
26	1997	1424	99.5	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0.0%	-3.00	—	0–1	—	+0.01	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
27	1998	1413	103.2	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	33.3%	-1.33	0–1	—	—	+0.01	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
28	1999	1555	130.6	—	—	—	—	+12	-37	-32	45.0%	-0.32	3–3 (50%)	3–4 (43%)	102.7	+0.23	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
29	2000	1503	118.0	—	—	—	—	+70	-25	—	34.2%	-0.97	1–3 (25%)	3–3 (50%)	98.9	+0.30	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
30	2001	1494	98.3	—	—	—	—	—	—	-13	33.3%	-0.89	0–1	0–1	—	+0.11	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
31	2002	1519	116.5	—	—	—	—	+20	—	-7	48.0%	-0.12	1–4 (20%)	1–3 (25%)	95.6	+0.14	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
32	2003	1501	105.5	-0.96	-1.21	0.910	48.8%	-7	-23	—	35.7%	-0.93	2–4 (33%)	1–3 (25%)	97.8	+0.08	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
33	2004	1461	95.4	-2.78	-1.48	0.811	45.3%	-19	—	—	11.1%	-2.78	0–1	—	—	+0.03	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
34	2005	1467	97.0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	50.0%	-0.50	—	—	—	+0.11	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Career	—	1586	118.4	-1.69	-1.32	0.868	47.4%	+26	-30	-16	35.1%	-1.00	14–30 (32%)	10–24 (29%)	89.2	+1.56	—	1971	148.7	—	—	—	—	+11	-58	-103	56.1%	+0.40	67–48 (58%)	31–18 (63%)	109.3	+0.47

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.

Maureen Drake's most-played WTA rivals
Opponent	W	L	M	Last Played	H2H
Amanda Coetzer	0	4	4	May 31, 2000	H2H
Tamarine Tanasugarn	1	2	3	Jan 15, 2003	H2H
Anne Kremer	2	1	3	Sep 19, 2002	H2H
Dominique Monami	0	3	3	Sep 1, 1999	H2H
Magui Serna	0	2	2	Sep 1, 2004	H2H

Naoko Sawamatsu's most-played WTA rivals
Opponent	W	L	M	Last Played	H2H
Monica Seles	0	10	10	Sep 25, 1998	H2H
Kimiko Date	3	5	8	Feb 2, 1996	H2H
Silvia Farina Elia	4	2	6	May 13, 1998	H2H
Mary Joe Fernandez	3	3	6	Oct 10, 1997	H2H
Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario	0	6	6	Aug 7, 1997	H2H