H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Maureen Drake vs Nicole Bradtke H2H: 0-2

Nicole Bradtke holds a 2–0 lead over Maureen Drake in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Nicole Bradtke leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicole Bradtke won the 1991 Canadian Open round of 64 6-1 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Maureen Drake
CAN Age 55 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Nicole Bradtke
AUS Age 56 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nicole Bradtke #60 6-1 6-0 Maureen Drake #204 Match data Aug 7, 1991* R64 Canadian Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Nicole Bradtke #32 7-5 6-2 Maureen Drake #278 Match data Aug 17, 1988* R64 Canadian Open Category 5 → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Maureen Drake #1,132 #47 612 1,586 40 93 30.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nicole Bradtke #394 #24 256 1,866 182 164 52.6% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Maureen Drake Nicole Bradtke
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1985 1–2 33.3% #147 1,507 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1986 6–5 54.5% #123 1,548 0 0
17 1988 2–4 33.3% #275 1,497 0 0 1987 15–19 44.1% #78 1,599 0 0
18 1989 3–5 37.5% #163 1,505 0 0 1988 24–17 58.5% #34 1,739 0 0
19 1990 1–5 16.7% #209 1,463 0 0 1989 16–17 48.5% #61 1,710 0 0
20 1991 1–3 25.0% #198 1,451 0 0 1990 21–20 51.2% #49 1,757 0 0
21 1992 0–5 0.0% #188 1,412 0 0 1991 21–19 52.5% #45 1,759 0 0
22 1993 3–10 23.1% #171 1,416 0 0 1992 22–18 55.0% #47 1,710 0 1
23 1994 1–3 25.0% #170 1,411 0 0 1993 26–14 65.0% #26 1,756 0 2
24 1995 2–2 50.0% #165 1,455 0 0 1994 2–5 28.6% #153 1,704 0 2
25 1996 1–5 16.7% #173 1,432 0 0 1995 21–15 58.3% #37 1,785 0 3
26 1997 0–1 0.0% #159 1,423 0 0 1996 6–11 35.3% #94 1,708 0 3
27 1998 0–1 0.0% #130 1,412 0 0 1997 1–2 33.3% #394 1,696 0 3
28 1999 12–15 44.4% #57 1,554 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2000 5–12 29.4% #147 1,503 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2001 1–3 25.0% #161 1,493 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2002 4–6 40.0% #99 1,519 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2003 3–8 27.3% #115 1,500 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 2004 0–4 0.0% #191 1,460 0 0 — — — — — — —
34 2005 1–1 50.0% #278 1,466 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Maureen Drake Nicole Bradtke
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 4 2 6 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
17 1988 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1987 5 5 10 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 3 5 40.0%
18 1989 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1988 10 9 19 52.6% 12 4 16 75.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
19 1990 0 4 4 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1989 11 10 21 52.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1991 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1990 10 11 21 47.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
21 1992 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 14 10 24 58.3% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 1993 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1992 13 8 21 61.9% 4 6 10 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
23 1994 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1993 20 8 28 71.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1995 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1996 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1995 13 9 22 59.1% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
26 1997 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 3 6 9 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 1998 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1997 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1999 8 9 17 47.1% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2000 4 6 10 40.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2002 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2003 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2004 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2005 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 23 57 80 28.8% 8 18 26 30.8% 5 11 16 31.2% 4 7 11 36.4% — 106 83 189 56.1% 48 44 92 52.2% 18 23 41 43.9% 10 14 24 41.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Maureen Drake Nicole Bradtke
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1508 116.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.83 — 0–1 — +0.25
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1548 101.9 — — — — +44 -8 — 53.8% 0.00 2–2 (50%) 1–0 — +2.05
17 1988 1498 102.4 — — — — +27 — — 35.7% -1.07 1–1 0–1 — -0.20 1987 1599 120.5 — — — — +20 -1 -62 44.3% -0.33 6–5 (55%) 2–5 (29%) 101.1 +1.69
18 1989 1505 108.3 — — — — +37 — — 38.9% -0.78 1–1 1–1 — +0.46 1988 1739 135.8 — — — — -93 +65 -219 57.3% +0.23 7–7 (50%) 5–2 (71%) 104.0 -0.02
19 1990 1464 106.0 — — — — +29 — — 26.7% -1.87 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — +0.61 1989 1711 134.8 — — — — -34 +69 -153 48.7% -0.16 7–5 (58%) 5–4 (56%) 104.6 +0.32
20 1991 1451 96.1 — — — — +36 — — 30.0% -1.80 1–1 — — +0.35 1990 1758 145.1 — — — — -31 +44 -163 52.6% +0.22 6–9 (40%) 7–8 (47%) 97.9 -2.63
21 1992 1413 99.9 — — — — +25 — — 16.7% -2.25 0–2 — — +0.07 1991 1760 142.2 — — — — +22 -3 -161 50.5% +0.33 9–6 (60%) 5–8 (38%) 98.9 -2.07
22 1993 1416 110.2 — — — — +28 — — 30.0% -1.30 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — -0.21 1992 1710 137.2 — — — — +42 -8 -96 57.0% +0.69 4–9 (31%) 3–6 (33%) 92.0 +0.67
23 1994 1412 100.5 — — — — +30 — — 30.0% -1.10 1–1 0–1 — +0.13 1993 1756 140.3 — — — — +73 -52 -113 62.8% +1.01 4–2 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 101.7 +0.27
24 1995 1455 122.0 — — — — +21 — — 42.9% -0.14 0–1 0–2 — -0.19 1994 1705 114.0 — — — — +54 — — 33.3% -1.53 0–1 1–0 — +0.09
25 1996 1433 102.9 — — — — +40 — — 21.4% -1.71 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.04 1995 1786 146.5 — — — — -12 -47 -117 57.1% +0.64 6–6 (50%) 5–4 (56%) 101.7 -2.62
26 1997 1424 99.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.01 1996 1709 125.5 — — — — +33 -3 — 43.2% -0.81 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) 94.7 -0.45
27 1998 1413 103.2 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.01 1997 1696 110.1 — — — — +26 — — 42.9% -0.71 0–1 — — -0.02
28 1999 1555 130.6 — — — — +12 -37 -32 45.0% -0.32 3–3 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 102.7 +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2000 1503 118.0 — — — — +70 -25 — 34.2% -0.97 1–3 (25%) 3–3 (50%) 98.9 +0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2001 1494 98.3 — — — — — — -13 33.3% -0.89 0–1 0–1 — +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2002 1519 116.5 — — — — +20 — -7 48.0% -0.12 1–4 (20%) 1–3 (25%) 95.6 +0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2003 1501 105.5 -0.96 -1.21 0.910 48.8% -7 -23 — 35.7% -0.93 2–4 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 97.8 +0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2004 1461 95.4 -2.78 -1.48 0.811 45.3% -19 — — 11.1% -2.78 0–1 — — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2005 1467 97.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.50 — — — +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1586 118.4 -1.69 -1.32 0.868 47.4% +26 -30 -16 35.1% -1.00 14–30 (32%) 10–24 (29%) 89.2 +1.56 — 1866 143.1 — — — — +7 +12 -133 52.8% +0.22 52–57 (48%) 38–42 (48%) 97.9 -0.72

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.