Maureen Drake
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amanda Coetzer | 0 | 4 | 4 | May 31, 2000 | H2H |
| Tamarine Tanasugarn | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jan 15, 2003 | H2H |
| Anne Kremer | 2 | 1 | 3 | Sep 19, 2002 | H2H |
| Dominique Monami | 0 | 3 | 3 | Sep 1, 1999 | H2H |
| Magui Serna | 0 | 2 | 2 | Sep 1, 2004 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Rosalyn Fairbank holds a 1–0 lead over Maureen Drake in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Rosalyn Fairbank leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Rosalyn Fairbank won the 1993 Delray Beach round of 32 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rosalyn Fairbank | 6-4 6-4 | Maureen Drake | Match data | Mar 4, 1993* | R32 | Delray Beach | Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maureen Drake | #1,132 | #47 | 612 | 1,586 | 40 | 93 | 30.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Rosalyn Fairbank | #325 | #15 | 51 | 1,932 | 336 | 309 | 52.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Maureen Drake | Rosalyn Fairbank | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1988 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #275 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1989 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #163 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 17–10 | 63.0% | — | 1,723 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1990 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #209 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 22–20 | 52.4% | — | 1,677 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #198 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 15–22 | 40.5% | — | 1,656 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,412 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 32–21 | 60.4% | — | 1,897 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #171 | 1,416 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 24–19 | 55.8% | — | 1,918 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1994 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #170 | 1,411 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #32 | 1,766 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1995 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #165 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #38 | 1,806 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1996 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #173 | 1,432 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #28 | 1,824 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #159 | 1,423 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #36 | 1,755 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #130 | 1,412 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #37 | 1,772 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1999 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #57 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 27–18 | 60.0% | #22 | 1,845 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2000 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #147 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #24 | 1,787 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2001 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #161 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #90 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2002 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #99 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,726 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2003 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #115 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #63 | 1,766 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 2004 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #284 | 1,704 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #278 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #261 | 1,598 | 0 | 1 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Maureen Drake | Rosalyn Fairbank | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | 1988 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1978 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1989 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1990 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 8 | 7 | 15 | 53.3% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% |
| 20 | 1991 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 4 | 9 | 13 | 30.8% |
| 21 | 1992 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 16 | 6 | 22 | 72.7% | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% |
| 22 | 1993 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1983 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 11 | 6 | 17 | 64.7% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% |
| 23 | 1994 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1984 | 8 | 7 | 15 | 53.3% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 8 | 7 | 15 | 53.3% | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% |
| 24 | 1995 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 13 | 11 | 24 | 54.2% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% |
| 25 | 1996 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1986 | 11 | 8 | 19 | 57.9% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% |
| 26 | 1997 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 14 | 6 | 20 | 70.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% |
| 27 | 1998 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 11 | 11 | 22 | 50.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 13 | 6 | 19 | 68.4% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 28 | 1999 | 8 | 9 | 17 | 47.1% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 13 | 4 | 17 | 76.5% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% |
| 29 | 2000 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 13 | 9 | 22 | 59.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% |
| 30 | 2001 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 9 | 10 | 19 | 47.4% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% |
| 31 | 2002 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1992 | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% |
| 32 | 2003 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1993 | 9 | 11 | 20 | 45.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 33 | 2004 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 34 | 2005 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| Career | — | 23 | 57 | 80 | 28.8% | 8 | 18 | 26 | 30.8% | 5 | 11 | 16 | 31.2% | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | — | 109 | 110 | 219 | 49.8% | 44 | 51 | 95 | 46.3% | 128 | 76 | 204 | 62.7% | 51 | 70 | 121 | 42.1% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Maureen Drake | Rosalyn Fairbank | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | 1988 | 1498 | 102.4 | — | — | — | — | +27 | — | — | 35.7% | -1.07 | 1–1 | 0–1 | — | -0.20 | 1978 | 1539 | 104.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | +66 | 75.0% | +0.75 | — | 2–0 | — | +0.38 |
| 18 | 1989 | 1505 | 108.3 | — | — | — | — | +37 | — | — | 38.9% | -0.78 | 1–1 | 1–1 | — | +0.46 | 1979 | 1724 | 136.7 | — | — | — | — | — | -159 | -3 | 61.3% | +1.02 | 4–4 (50%) | 3–4 (43%) | 101.5 | +0.70 |
| 19 | 1990 | 1464 | 106.0 | — | — | — | — | +29 | — | — | 26.7% | -1.87 | 1–2 (33%) | 0–1 | — | +0.61 | 1980 | 1678 | 128.5 | — | — | — | — | -83 | -36 | +37 | 52.1% | +0.08 | 6–8 (43%) | 1–0 | — | -0.49 |
| 20 | 1991 | 1451 | 96.1 | — | — | — | — | +36 | — | — | 30.0% | -1.80 | 1–1 | — | — | +0.35 | 1981 | 1657 | 122.8 | — | — | — | — | -41 | +16 | +48 | 40.7% | -0.51 | 7–5 (58%) | 2–3 (40%) | 103.2 | +0.67 |
| 21 | 1992 | 1413 | 99.9 | — | — | — | — | +25 | — | — | 16.7% | -2.25 | 0–2 | — | — | +0.07 | 1982 | 1897 | 150.2 | — | — | — | — | -180 | -228 | +28 | 57.5% | +0.52 | 9–7 (56%) | 5–3 (63%) | 105.2 | -2.75 |
| 22 | 1993 | 1416 | 110.2 | — | — | — | — | +28 | — | — | 30.0% | -1.30 | 1–3 (25%) | 0–1 | — | -0.21 | 1983 | 1919 | 136.6 | — | — | — | — | -79 | -271 | +29 | 53.1% | +0.19 | 7–3 (70%) | 1–4 (20%) | 101.2 | -2.11 |
| 23 | 1994 | 1412 | 100.5 | — | — | — | — | +30 | — | — | 30.0% | -1.10 | 1–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.13 | 1984 | 1767 | 136.1 | — | — | — | — | +21 | -164 | +101 | 46.8% | +0.05 | 7–8 (47%) | 3–8 (27%) | 94.2 | +0.03 |
| 24 | 1995 | 1455 | 122.0 | — | — | — | — | +21 | — | — | 42.9% | -0.14 | 0–1 | 0–2 | — | -0.19 | 1985 | 1806 | 136.7 | — | — | — | — | -14 | -143 | +37 | 51.3% | +0.09 | 9–4 (69%) | 9–2 (82%) | 109.3 | -1.60 |
| 25 | 1996 | 1433 | 102.9 | — | — | — | — | +40 | — | — | 21.4% | -1.71 | 1–1 | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.04 | 1986 | 1824 | 142.9 | — | — | — | — | +15 | -154 | -17 | 52.5% | +0.05 | 8–7 (53%) | 5–4 (56%) | 102.0 | -2.16 |
| 26 | 1997 | 1424 | 99.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.01 | 1987 | 1756 | 134.7 | — | — | — | — | -60 | -105 | +159 | 50.0% | +0.03 | 8–6 (57%) | 5–1 (83%) | 103.9 | -0.46 |
| 27 | 1998 | 1413 | 103.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.33 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.01 | 1988 | 1772 | 141.1 | — | — | — | — | -53 | -160 | +181 | 56.0% | +0.38 | 7–11 (39%) | 8–5 (62%) | 98.3 | +0.48 |
| 28 | 1999 | 1555 | 130.6 | — | — | — | — | +12 | -37 | -32 | 45.0% | -0.32 | 3–3 (50%) | 3–4 (43%) | 102.7 | +0.23 | 1989 | 1845 | 147.2 | — | — | — | — | -106 | -205 | +177 | 57.8% | +0.54 | 7–5 (58%) | 6–8 (43%) | 101.7 | -0.49 |
| 29 | 2000 | 1503 | 118.0 | — | — | — | — | +70 | -25 | — | 34.2% | -0.97 | 1–3 (25%) | 3–3 (50%) | 98.9 | +0.30 | 1990 | 1787 | 137.3 | — | — | — | — | -6 | — | +236 | 51.9% | +0.13 | 11–3 (79%) | 5–2 (71%) | 108.9 | +0.60 |
| 30 | 2001 | 1494 | 98.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | -13 | 33.3% | -0.89 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.11 | 1991 | 1637 | 127.7 | — | — | — | — | +34 | -74 | +316 | 46.1% | -0.10 | 3–7 (30%) | 1–5 (17%) | 88.8 | +1.07 |
| 31 | 2002 | 1519 | 116.5 | — | — | — | — | +20 | — | -7 | 48.0% | -0.12 | 1–4 (20%) | 1–3 (25%) | 95.6 | +0.14 | 1992 | 1726 | 133.0 | — | — | — | — | -39 | -176 | +270 | 51.5% | -0.04 | 3–3 (50%) | 4–4 (50%) | 100.5 | -1.50 |
| 32 | 2003 | 1501 | 105.5 | -0.96 | -1.21 | 0.910 | 48.8% | -7 | -23 | — | 35.7% | -0.93 | 2–4 (33%) | 1–3 (25%) | 97.8 | +0.08 | 1993 | 1766 | 146.5 | — | — | — | — | -14 | -176 | +196 | 45.3% | -0.44 | 9–5 (64%) | 5–4 (56%) | 104.6 | -2.22 |
| 33 | 2004 | 1461 | 95.4 | -2.78 | -1.48 | 0.811 | 45.3% | -19 | — | — | 11.1% | -2.78 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.03 | 1994 | 1704 | 104.2 | — | — | — | — | -15 | — | — | 0.0% | -3.63 | — | — | — | -0.30 |
| 34 | 2005 | 1467 | 97.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 50.0% | -0.50 | — | — | — | +0.11 | 1995 | 1599 | 97.0 | — | — | — | — | +23 | — | +239 | 15.8% | -2.47 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.12 |
| Career | — | 1586 | 118.4 | -1.69 | -1.32 | 0.868 | 47.4% | +26 | -30 | -16 | 35.1% | -1.00 | 14–30 (32%) | 10–24 (29%) | 89.2 | +1.56 | — | 1932 | 143.7 | — | — | — | — | -36 | -134 | +112 | 51.1% | +0.09 | 105–87 (55%) | 65–57 (53%) | 105.0 | -1.56 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amanda Coetzer | 0 | 4 | 4 | May 31, 2000 | H2H |
| Tamarine Tanasugarn | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jan 15, 2003 | H2H |
| Anne Kremer | 2 | 1 | 3 | Sep 19, 2002 | H2H |
| Dominique Monami | 0 | 3 | 3 | Sep 1, 1999 | H2H |
| Magui Serna | 0 | 2 | 2 | Sep 1, 2004 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jo Durie | 5 | 8 | 13 | Jul 21, 1990 | H2H |
| Pam Shriver | 2 | 10 | 12 | Nov 5, 1992 | H2H |
| Wendy Turnbull | 3 | 9 | 12 | Nov 10, 1988 | H2H |
| Martina Navratilova | 0 | 11 | 11 | Aug 13, 1993 | H2H |
| Barbara Potter | 4 | 7 | 11 | Jun 16, 1988 | H2H |