H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Maureen Drake vs Samantha Reeves H2H: 1-0

Maureen Drake holds a 1–0 lead over Samantha Reeves in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Maureen Drake leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Maureen Drake won the 2003 Quebec City round of 32 6-3 2-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Maureen Drake
CAN Age 55 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Samantha Reeves
USA Age 47 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Maureen Drake #118 6-3 2-6 6-4 Samantha Reeves #76 Match data Oct 30, 2003* R32 Quebec City Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Maureen Drake #1,132 #47 612 1,586 40 93 30.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Samantha Reeves #864 #62 523 1,629 30 59 33.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Maureen Drake Samantha Reeves
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1988 2–4 33.3% #275 1,497 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1989 3–5 37.5% #163 1,505 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1990 1–5 16.7% #209 1,463 0 0 1998 2–8 20.0% #111 1,480 0 0
20 1991 1–3 25.0% #198 1,451 0 0 1999 4–8 33.3% #121 1,480 0 0
21 1992 0–5 0.0% #188 1,412 0 0 2000 1–4 20.0% #171 1,446 0 0
22 1993 3–10 23.1% #171 1,416 0 0 2001 4–3 57.1% #106 1,515 0 0
23 1994 1–3 25.0% #170 1,411 0 0 2002 8–14 36.4% #108 1,544 0 0
24 1995 2–2 50.0% #165 1,455 0 0 2003 8–10 44.4% #74 1,588 0 0
25 1996 1–5 16.7% #173 1,432 0 0 2004 3–12 20.0% #198 1,526 0 0
26 1997 0–1 0.0% #159 1,423 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 1998 0–1 0.0% #130 1,412 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 1999 12–15 44.4% #57 1,554 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2000 5–12 29.4% #147 1,503 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2001 1–3 25.0% #161 1,493 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2002 4–6 40.0% #99 1,519 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2003 3–8 27.3% #115 1,500 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 2004 0–4 0.0% #191 1,460 0 0 — — — — — — —
34 2005 1–1 50.0% #278 1,466 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Maureen Drake Samantha Reeves
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1988 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1989 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1990 0 4 4 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1998 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1991 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1999 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1992 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
22 1993 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 2001 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
23 1994 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2002 5 7 12 41.7% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1995 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 3 3 6 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1996 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2004 1 5 6 16.7% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 1997 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1998 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1999 8 9 17 47.1% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2000 4 6 10 40.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2002 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2003 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2004 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2005 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 23 57 80 28.8% 8 18 26 30.8% 5 11 16 31.2% 4 7 11 36.4% — 14 27 41 34.1% 11 22 33 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 5 8 37.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Maureen Drake Samantha Reeves
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1988 1498 102.4 — — — — +27 — — 35.7% -1.07 1–1 0–1 — -0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1989 1505 108.3 — — — — +37 — — 38.9% -0.78 1–1 1–1 — +0.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1990 1464 106.0 — — — — +29 — — 26.7% -1.87 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — +0.61 1998 1480 114.3 — — — — +27 +68 — 29.2% -1.17 1–3 (25%) 0–2 — -0.17
20 1991 1451 96.1 — — — — +36 — — 30.0% -1.80 1–1 — — +0.35 1999 1481 106.1 — — — — +28 +49 — 34.6% -1.65 1–1 1–0 — +0.52
21 1992 1413 99.9 — — — — +25 — — 16.7% -2.25 0–2 — — +0.07 2000 1447 92.1 — — — — — +34 — 18.2% -1.45 1–0 0–1 — +0.50
22 1993 1416 110.2 — — — — +28 — — 30.0% -1.30 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — -0.21 2001 1515 113.3 — — — — +30 — — 47.1% +0.12 3–0 (100%) 1–0 — +0.29
23 1994 1412 100.5 — — — — +30 — — 30.0% -1.10 1–1 0–1 — +0.13 2002 1545 121.7 — — — — +16 -68 — 42.6% -0.48 3–7 (30%) 4–5 (44%) 96.7 -0.91
24 1995 1455 122.0 — — — — +21 — — 42.9% -0.14 0–1 0–2 — -0.19 2003 1589 112.2 -1.00 +0.72 0.861 46.5% -29 -69 +14 41.0% -0.92 3–2 (60%) 2–0 — -0.54
25 1996 1433 102.9 — — — — +40 — — 21.4% -1.71 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.04 2004 1526 110.0 -3.84 -1.12 0.609 38.9% -9 -32 — 24.2% -1.70 3–2 (60%) 0–1 — -0.74
26 1997 1424 99.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1998 1413 103.2 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1999 1555 130.6 — — — — +12 -37 -32 45.0% -0.32 3–3 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 102.7 +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2000 1503 118.0 — — — — +70 -25 — 34.2% -0.97 1–3 (25%) 3–3 (50%) 98.9 +0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2001 1494 98.3 — — — — — — -13 33.3% -0.89 0–1 0–1 — +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2002 1519 116.5 — — — — +20 — -7 48.0% -0.12 1–4 (20%) 1–3 (25%) 95.6 +0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2003 1501 105.5 -0.96 -1.21 0.910 48.8% -7 -23 — 35.7% -0.93 2–4 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 97.8 +0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2004 1461 95.4 -2.78 -1.48 0.811 45.3% -19 — — 11.1% -2.78 0–1 — — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2005 1467 97.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.50 — — — +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1586 118.4 -1.69 -1.32 0.868 47.4% +26 -30 -16 35.1% -1.00 14–30 (32%) 10–24 (29%) 89.2 +1.56 — 1630 116.7 -2.07 +0.03 0.755 43.6% +12 -24 +14 35.8% -0.99 15–15 (50%) 8–9 (47%) 103.4 -1.18

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.