H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Maureen Drake vs Sara Gomer H2H: 0-1

Sara Gomer holds a 1–0 lead over Maureen Drake in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sara Gomer leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sara Gomer won the 1988 ASB Classic round of 32 5-7 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Maureen Drake
CAN Age 55 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Sara Gomer
GBR Age 62 Left-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sara Gomer #79 5-7 6-3 6-1 Maureen Drake #273 Match data Jan 28, 1988* R32 ASB Classic WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Maureen Drake #1,132 #47 612 1,586 40 93 30.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sara Gomer #317 #46 18 1,778 105 132 44.3% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Maureen Drake Sara Gomer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1980 2–1 66.7% — 1,518 0 0
17 1988 2–4 33.3% #275 1,497 0 0 1981 7–8 46.7% — 1,517 0 0
18 1989 3–5 37.5% #163 1,505 0 0 1982 6–4 60.0% — 1,545 0 0
19 1990 1–5 16.7% #209 1,463 0 0 1983 3–7 30.0% — 1,531 0 0
20 1991 1–3 25.0% #198 1,451 0 0 1984 1–5 16.7% #128 1,510 0 0
21 1992 0–5 0.0% #188 1,412 0 0 1985 10–15 40.0% #101 1,568 0 0
22 1993 3–10 23.1% #171 1,416 0 0 1986 13–14 48.1% #59 1,660 0 0
23 1994 1–3 25.0% #170 1,411 0 0 1987 18–19 48.6% #72 1,680 0 0
24 1995 2–2 50.0% #165 1,455 0 0 1988 20–16 55.6% #51 1,747 0 1
25 1996 1–5 16.7% #173 1,432 0 0 1989 7–12 36.8% #124 1,638 0 1
26 1997 0–1 0.0% #159 1,423 0 0 1990 6–8 42.9% #92 1,635 0 1
27 1998 0–1 0.0% #130 1,412 0 0 1991 8–13 38.1% #120 1,660 0 1
28 1999 12–15 44.4% #57 1,554 0 0 1992 4–10 28.6% #173 1,556 0 1
29 2000 5–12 29.4% #147 1,503 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2001 1–3 25.0% #161 1,493 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2002 4–6 40.0% #99 1,519 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2003 3–8 27.3% #115 1,500 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 2004 0–4 0.0% #191 1,460 0 0 — — — — — — —
34 2005 1–1 50.0% #278 1,466 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Maureen Drake Sara Gomer
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1988 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1981 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1989 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1982 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
19 1990 0 4 4 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1983 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
20 1991 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1984 — — — — — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1992 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 2 2 4 50.0%
22 1993 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1986 8 6 14 57.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1994 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1987 10 10 20 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 1995 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 14 11 25 56.0% — — — — 5 4 9 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 1996 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 1 6 7 14.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
26 1997 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
27 1998 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1991 5 7 12 41.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1999 8 9 17 47.1% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1992 3 6 9 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
29 2000 4 6 10 40.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2002 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2003 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2004 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2005 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 23 57 80 28.8% 8 18 26 30.8% 5 11 16 31.2% 4 7 11 36.4% — 47 57 104 45.2% 8 17 25 32.0% 32 39 71 45.1% 7 10 17 41.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Maureen Drake Sara Gomer
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1519 104.5 — — — — — — — 66.7% +0.83 — — — +0.03
17 1988 1498 102.4 — — — — +27 — — 35.7% -1.07 1–1 0–1 — -0.20 1981 1517 109.2 — — — — — — — 45.5% -0.09 2–1 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 102.6 +0.09
18 1989 1505 108.3 — — — — +37 — — 38.9% -0.78 1–1 1–1 — +0.46 1982 1545 105.7 — — — — — -19 — 60.0% +0.55 — 2–0 — +1.20
19 1990 1464 106.0 — — — — +29 — — 26.7% -1.87 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — +0.61 1983 1532 102.6 — — — — +81 — +22 40.0% -0.92 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 97.8 +0.59
20 1991 1451 96.1 — — — — +36 — — 30.0% -1.80 1–1 — — +0.35 1984 1511 108.2 — — — — — — +34 26.7% -1.60 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — +0.16
21 1992 1413 99.9 — — — — +25 — — 16.7% -2.25 0–2 — — +0.07 1985 1568 117.6 — — — — -18 — +24 42.9% -0.46 2–4 (33%) 4–3 (57%) 98.6 +1.64
22 1993 1416 110.2 — — — — +28 — — 30.0% -1.30 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — -0.21 1986 1660 119.5 — — — — -6 -213 -39 46.9% -0.28 6–4 (60%) 4–4 (50%) 103.7 +0.62
23 1994 1412 100.5 — — — — +30 — — 30.0% -1.10 1–1 0–1 — +0.13 1987 1680 131.9 — — — — -13 — -6 46.3% -0.39 6–2 (75%) 5–5 (50%) 105.2 -0.33
24 1995 1455 122.0 — — — — +21 — — 42.9% -0.14 0–1 0–2 — -0.19 1988 1747 138.3 — — — — -19 — -34 53.7% +0.15 6–4 (60%) 9–4 (69%) 108.3 -0.39
25 1996 1433 102.9 — — — — +40 — — 21.4% -1.71 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.04 1989 1639 114.0 — — — — -23 -117 +78 43.5% -0.78 2–6 (25%) 1–0 — -0.51
26 1997 1424 99.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.01 1990 1636 113.1 — — — — -36 — +106 42.4% -0.48 3–2 (60%) 1–3 (25%) 99.2 +0.82
27 1998 1413 103.2 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.01 1991 1661 134.5 — — — — -33 — +111 40.4% -0.55 2–3 (40%) 0–3 (0%) 97.6 -1.11
28 1999 1555 130.6 — — — — +12 -37 -32 45.0% -0.32 3–3 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 102.7 +0.23 1992 1557 104.1 — — — — +24 -82 — 34.4% -1.06 1–3 (25%) 1–3 (25%) 94.9 +1.43
29 2000 1503 118.0 — — — — +70 -25 — 34.2% -0.97 1–3 (25%) 3–3 (50%) 98.9 +0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2001 1494 98.3 — — — — — — -13 33.3% -0.89 0–1 0–1 — +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2002 1519 116.5 — — — — +20 — -7 48.0% -0.12 1–4 (20%) 1–3 (25%) 95.6 +0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2003 1501 105.5 -0.96 -1.21 0.910 48.8% -7 -23 — 35.7% -0.93 2–4 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 97.8 +0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2004 1461 95.4 -2.78 -1.48 0.811 45.3% -19 — — 11.1% -2.78 0–1 — — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2005 1467 97.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.50 — — — +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1586 118.4 -1.69 -1.32 0.868 47.4% +26 -30 -16 35.1% -1.00 14–30 (32%) 10–24 (29%) 89.2 +1.56 — 1779 127.6 — — — — -13 -99 +25 45.3% -0.39 32–35 (48%) 31–30 (51%) 102.3 +1.79

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.