Maureen Drake
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amanda Coetzer | 0 | 4 | 4 | May 31, 2000 | H2H |
| Tamarine Tanasugarn | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jan 15, 2003 | H2H |
| Anne Kremer | 2 | 1 | 3 | Sep 19, 2002 | H2H |
| Dominique Monami | 0 | 3 | 3 | Sep 1, 1999 | H2H |
| Magui Serna | 0 | 2 | 2 | Sep 1, 2004 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Veronika Martinek holds a 1–0 lead over Maureen Drake in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Veronika Martinek leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Veronika Martinek won the 1993 Amelia Island round of 64 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Veronika Martinek | 6-2 6-1 | Maureen Drake | Match data | Apr 7, 1993* | R64 | Amelia Island | Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maureen Drake | #1,132 | #47 | 612 | 1,586 | 40 | 93 | 30.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Veronika Martinek | #530 | #49 | 177 | 1,664 | 73 | 104 | 41.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Maureen Drake | Veronika Martinek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #116 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1988 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #275 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #160 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1989 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #163 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #54 | 1,591 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1990 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #209 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #74 | 1,607 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #198 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #61 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1992 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,412 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #131 | 1,530 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1993 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #171 | 1,416 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #86 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1994 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #170 | 1,411 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #80 | 1,579 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1995 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #165 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #143 | 1,489 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1996 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #173 | 1,432 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #144 | 1,521 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #159 | 1,423 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #465 | 1,504 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #130 | 1,412 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1999 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #57 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2000 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #147 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2001 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #161 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2002 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #99 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2003 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #115 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2004 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #278 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Maureen Drake | Veronika Martinek | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1988 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1989 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1989 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | — | — | — | — | 11 | 8 | 19 | 57.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1990 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 11 | 10 | 21 | 52.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1991 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 10 | 8 | 18 | 55.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1992 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1993 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1994 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1994 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1995 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1995 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1996 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1997 | — | — | — | — | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1997 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1998 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1999 | 8 | 9 | 17 | 47.1% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2000 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2001 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2002 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2003 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2004 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2005 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 23 | 57 | 80 | 28.8% | 8 | 18 | 26 | 30.8% | 5 | 11 | 16 | 31.2% | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | — | 12 | 28 | 40 | 30.0% | 61 | 69 | 130 | 46.9% | 0 | 7 | 7 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Maureen Drake | Veronika Martinek | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1510 | 111.4 | — | — | — | — | +15 | +54 | — | 50.0% | +0.03 | 3–5 (38%) | — | — | +1.90 |
| 17 | 1988 | 1498 | 102.4 | — | — | — | — | +27 | — | — | 35.7% | -1.07 | 1–1 | 0–1 | — | -0.20 | 1989 | 1459 | 95.1 | — | — | — | — | +16 | +80 | — | 17.4% | -2.56 | 1–0 | 0–2 | — | +0.68 |
| 18 | 1989 | 1505 | 108.3 | — | — | — | — | +37 | — | — | 38.9% | -0.78 | 1–1 | 1–1 | — | +0.46 | 1990 | 1592 | 115.1 | — | — | — | — | — | +74 | — | 53.2% | 0.00 | 4–3 (57%) | 4–1 (80%) | 104.6 | +1.22 |
| 19 | 1990 | 1464 | 106.0 | — | — | — | — | +29 | — | — | 26.7% | -1.87 | 1–2 (33%) | 0–1 | — | +0.61 | 1991 | 1608 | 110.7 | — | — | — | — | -146 | +86 | — | 46.7% | -0.45 | 2–2 (50%) | 3–0 (100%) | 103.2 | +1.23 |
| 20 | 1991 | 1451 | 96.1 | — | — | — | — | +36 | — | — | 30.0% | -1.80 | 1–1 | — | — | +0.35 | 1992 | 1652 | 129.4 | — | — | — | — | -155 | +71 | — | 46.4% | -0.25 | 4–2 (67%) | 2–2 (50%) | 104.4 | +0.53 |
| 21 | 1992 | 1413 | 99.9 | — | — | — | — | +25 | — | — | 16.7% | -2.25 | 0–2 | — | — | +0.07 | 1993 | 1531 | 109.2 | — | — | — | — | -41 | +75 | — | 41.3% | -0.48 | 1–7 (13%) | 1–1 | — | +1.41 |
| 22 | 1993 | 1416 | 110.2 | — | — | — | — | +28 | — | — | 30.0% | -1.30 | 1–3 (25%) | 0–1 | — | -0.21 | 1994 | 1571 | 121.9 | — | — | — | — | -47 | +68 | — | 44.4% | -0.78 | 2–2 (50%) | 3–0 (100%) | — | -0.54 |
| 23 | 1994 | 1412 | 100.5 | — | — | — | — | +30 | — | — | 30.0% | -1.10 | 1–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.13 | 1995 | 1580 | 110.5 | — | — | — | — | -49 | +57 | — | 45.9% | -0.70 | 2–1 (67%) | — | — | +0.42 |
| 24 | 1995 | 1455 | 122.0 | — | — | — | — | +21 | — | — | 42.9% | -0.14 | 0–1 | 0–2 | — | -0.19 | 1996 | 1489 | 102.6 | — | — | — | — | -7 | +78 | — | 25.0% | -2.08 | 1–3 (25%) | 0–1 | — | +0.67 |
| 25 | 1996 | 1433 | 102.9 | — | — | — | — | +40 | — | — | 21.4% | -1.71 | 1–1 | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.04 | 1997 | 1521 | 108.0 | — | — | — | — | — | +74 | — | 50.0% | -0.08 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.43 |
| 26 | 1997 | 1424 | 99.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.01 | 1998 | 1504 | 95.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | +0.12 |
| 27 | 1998 | 1413 | 103.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.33 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.01 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1999 | 1555 | 130.6 | — | — | — | — | +12 | -37 | -32 | 45.0% | -0.32 | 3–3 (50%) | 3–4 (43%) | 102.7 | +0.23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2000 | 1503 | 118.0 | — | — | — | — | +70 | -25 | — | 34.2% | -0.97 | 1–3 (25%) | 3–3 (50%) | 98.9 | +0.30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2001 | 1494 | 98.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | -13 | 33.3% | -0.89 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2002 | 1519 | 116.5 | — | — | — | — | +20 | — | -7 | 48.0% | -0.12 | 1–4 (20%) | 1–3 (25%) | 95.6 | +0.14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2003 | 1501 | 105.5 | -0.96 | -1.21 | 0.910 | 48.8% | -7 | -23 | — | 35.7% | -0.93 | 2–4 (33%) | 1–3 (25%) | 97.8 | +0.08 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2004 | 1461 | 95.4 | -2.78 | -1.48 | 0.811 | 45.3% | -19 | — | — | 11.1% | -2.78 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.03 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2005 | 1467 | 97.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 50.0% | -0.50 | — | — | — | +0.11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1586 | 118.4 | -1.69 | -1.32 | 0.868 | 47.4% | +26 | -30 | -16 | 35.1% | -1.00 | 14–30 (32%) | 10–24 (29%) | 89.2 | +1.56 | — | 1664 | 117.3 | — | — | — | — | -64 | +72 | — | 43.0% | -0.66 | 20–25 (44%) | 13–8 (62%) | 102.0 | +4.56 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amanda Coetzer | 0 | 4 | 4 | May 31, 2000 | H2H |
| Tamarine Tanasugarn | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jan 15, 2003 | H2H |
| Anne Kremer | 2 | 1 | 3 | Sep 19, 2002 | H2H |
| Dominique Monami | 0 | 3 | 3 | Sep 1, 1999 | H2H |
| Magui Serna | 0 | 2 | 2 | Sep 1, 2004 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Petra Langrova | 2 | 2 | 4 | Jul 17, 1997 | H2H |
| Laura Garrone | 2 | 2 | 4 | Aug 8, 1996 | H2H |
| Sabine Hack | 0 | 4 | 4 | Jul 18, 1996 | H2H |
| Barbara Schett | 0 | 4 | 4 | Apr 12, 1996 | H2H |
| Dominique Monami | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jan 11, 1996 | H2H |