H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Maureen Drake vs Yoon Jeong Cho H2H: 1-1
Maureen Drake and Yoon Jeong Cho are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Maureen Drake leads 1–0 on clay, while Yoon Jeong Cho leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Maureen Drake won the 2003 Charleston second round 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CAN
Age 55
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
KOR
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 9, 2003* | Charleston | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Maureen Drake | 6-1 6-1 | Yoon Jeong Cho | Match data |
| Jun 12, 2002* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Yoon Jeong Cho | 2-6 7-6(1) 6-1 | Maureen Drake | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maureen Drake | #1,132 | #47 | 612 | 1,586 | 40 | 93 | 30.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Yoon Jeong Cho | #1,416 | #45 | 740 | 1,704 | 45 | 58 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Maureen Drake | Yoon Jeong Cho | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1988 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #275 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #252 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #163 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #207 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #209 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #221 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #198 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #173 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,412 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #115 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #171 | 1,415 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #83 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #170 | 1,411 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #83 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #165 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #173 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #173 | 1,432 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #75 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #159 | 1,423 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #265 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #130 | 1,412 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1416 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #57 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2000 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #147 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2001 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #161 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2002 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #99 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2003 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #115 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #278 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |