H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Maya Kidowaki vs Noelle Van Lottum H2H: 2-0
Maya Kidowaki holds a 2–0 lead over Noelle Van Lottum in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Maya Kidowaki leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Maya Kidowaki won the 1991 Roland Garros second round 6-3 5-7 8-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 57
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
Age 54
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 1991* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Maya Kidowaki | 6-3 5-7 8-6 | Noelle Van Lottum | Match data |
| Jan 2, 1991* | Brisbane | WTA 500 | R64 | Hard | Maya Kidowaki | 6-2 6-4 | Noelle Van Lottum | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maya Kidowaki | #594 | #68 | 17 | 1,659 | 34 | 56 | 37.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Noelle Van Lottum | — | — | — | 1,659 | 56 | 96 | 36.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Maya Kidowaki | Noelle Van Lottum | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 8–15 | 34.8% | — | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #247 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 17–20 | 45.9% | — | 1,611 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1989 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #138 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 13–21 | 38.2% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1990 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #93 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1991 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #73 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–9 | 10.0% | — | 1,466 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1992 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #148 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,442 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1993 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #200 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 2–9 | 18.2% | — | 1,427 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #553 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,429 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,416 | 0 | 1 |