H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Maylis Burel vs Maria Teresa Nasuelli H2H: 0-1

Maria Teresa Nasuelli holds a 1–0 lead over Maylis Burel in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Maria Teresa Nasuelli leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Maria Teresa Nasuelli won the 1974 Nice round of 32 6-0 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Maylis Burel
FRA
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Maria Teresa Nasuelli
ITA

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Maria Teresa Nasuelli 6-0 6-2 Maylis Burel Match data Apr 5, 1974* R32 Nice WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Maylis Burel — — — 1,500 0 9 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Maria Teresa Nasuelli — — — 1,636 66 95 41.0% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Maylis Burel Maria Teresa Nasuelli
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1968 0–3 0.0% — 1,463 0 0 1968 7–12 36.8% — 1,451 0 0
1969 0–2 0.0% — 1,434 0 0 1969 14–8 63.6% — 1,551 0 2
1970 0–2 0.0% — 1,411 0 0 1970 8–13 38.1% — 1,552 0 2
1972 0–1 0.0% — 1,400 0 0 1971 7–13 35.0% — 1,550 0 2
1974 0–1 0.0% — 1,389 0 0 1972 5–9 35.7% — 1,554 0 3
— — — — — — — 1973 4–8 33.3% — 1,521 0 3
— — — — — — — 1974 6–7 46.2% — 1,565 0 3
— — — — — — — 1975 7–11 38.9% — 1,558 0 3
— — — — — — — 1976 1–5 16.7% — 1,542 0 3
— — — — — — — 1977 1–1 50.0% — 1,555 0 3
— — — — — — — 1978 0–3 0.0% — 1,523 0 3
— — — — — — — 1979 1–1 50.0% — 1,524 0 3
— — — — — — — 1980 5–4 55.6% — 1,550 0 3

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Maylis Burel Maria Teresa Nasuelli
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1968 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1968 — — — — 7 12 19 36.8% — — — — — — — —
1969 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1969 — — — — 14 8 22 63.6% — — — — — — — —
1970 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1970 2 1 3 66.7% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — —
1972 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1971 — — — — 6 10 16 37.5% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
1974 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1972 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 0 1 1 0.0% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 — — — — 5 6 11 45.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 0 1 1 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 — — — — 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 — — — — 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — —
Career — — — — 0 5 5 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% Career 2 4 6 33.3% 54 71 125 43.2% 3 12 15 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Maylis Burel Maria Teresa Nasuelli
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1968 1464 88.9 — — — — — — — 14.3% -3.43 0–1 — — -0.07 1968 1452 99.3 — — — — — -25 — 39.1% -0.67 4–4 (50%) — — -0.18
1969 1435 90.3 — — — — — — — 20.0% -3.00 0–1 — — +0.33 1969 1551 108.6 — — — — — +21 — 58.0% +0.76 5–3 (63%) — — +3.50
1970 1412 89.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.17 1970 1552 106.9 — — — — +23 +17 -69 40.0% -0.62 4–4 (50%) — — +0.65
1972 1400 97.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.18 1971 1551 105.7 — — — — — +8 -81 44.7% -0.42 3–3 (50%) — — +1.00
1974 1390 93.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — +0.12 1972 1554 109.6 — — — — — +9 -86 41.9% -0.48 2–3 (40%) 0–1 — +0.81
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 1522 98.6 — — — — — +27 — 33.3% -1.74 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — +1.54
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1566 122.1 — — — — — +20 — 46.4% -0.50 1–1 2–0 — -0.35
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 1559 118.6 — — — — — -28 — 39.5% -0.77 6–3 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 105.1 -0.38
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1543 112.8 — — — — — -34 — 23.1% -1.54 0–1 0–1 — -0.54
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1556 109.7 — — — — — — — 66.7% +0.50 — — — 0.00
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1524 97.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.11
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1525 100.9 — — — — — — — 50.0% 0.00 — 1–0 — +0.52
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1551 106.2 — — — — — -11 — 55.6% +0.89 2–0 — — +0.84
Career 1500 83.4 — — — — — — — 10.0% -3.60 0–2 — — +8.11 Career 1637 113.0 — — — — +23 +4 -78 43.1% -0.46 29–23 (56%) 7–5 (58%) 106.7 +4.85

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.