H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Meghann Shaughnessy vs Amanda Coetzer H2H: 2-4

Amanda Coetzer holds a 4–2 lead over Meghann Shaughnessy in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Amanda Coetzer leads 3–1 on clay, while Meghann Shaughnessy leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Amanda Coetzer won the 2003 Los Angeles fourth round 7-6(4) 6-3.

USA Age 47 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 4
6 main draw meetings
RSA Age 54 Right-Handed 158 cm / 5'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 8, 2003* Los Angeles WTA 500 R16 Hard Amanda Coetzer #14 7-6(4) 6-3 Meghann Shaughnessy #19 Match data
Jul 1, 2001* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Meghann Shaughnessy #18 7-6(4) 2-6 6-1 Amanda Coetzer #13 Match data
May 11, 2001* Berlin WTA 1000 R16 Clay Amanda Coetzer #8 6-3 7-6(1) Meghann Shaughnessy #21 Match data
May 5, 2001* Hamburg WTA 500 SF Clay Meghann Shaughnessy #25 6-3 6-4 Amanda Coetzer #8 Match data
Apr 14, 2001* Amelia Island WTA 500 QF Clay Amanda Coetzer #10 6-3 6-3 Meghann Shaughnessy #26 Match data
May 18, 2000* Antwerp WTA 500 QF Clay Amanda Coetzer #11 6-1 6-3 Meghann Shaughnessy #66 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Meghann Shaughnessy #1,104 #11 1,949 1,888 233 233 50.0% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Amanda Coetzer #289 #3 3,380 2,051 491 307 61.5% 0 1 0 1 7 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Meghann Shaughnessy Amanda Coetzer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1988 3–2 60.0% #152 1,536 0 0
17 1996 3–4 42.9% #165 1,512 0 0 1989 16–13 55.2% #63 1,675 0 0
18 1997 0–1 0.0% #198 1,499 0 0 1990 16–19 45.7% #76 1,662 0 0
19 1998 8–9 47.1% #69 1,544 0 0 1991 15–19 44.1% #68 1,686 0 0
20 1999 10–22 31.2% #99 1,439 0 0 1992 35–15 70.0% #17 1,857 0 0
21 2000 23–20 53.5% #38 1,652 0 1 1993 42–18 70.0% #15 1,991 0 2
22 2001 45–25 64.3% #12 1,825 0 2 1994 38–19 66.7% #18 1,885 0 3
23 2002 29–27 51.8% #30 1,716 0 2 1995 31–22 58.5% #19 1,910 0 3
24 2003 32–23 58.2% #17 1,725 0 3 1996 31–20 60.8% #14 1,863 0 3
25 2004 20–22 47.6% #40 1,663 0 3 1997 60–25 70.6% #4 2,013 0 5
26 2005 17–25 40.5% #66 1,563 0 3 1998 32–23 58.2% #17 1,887 0 6
27 2006 27–20 57.4% #37 1,709 0 5 1999 37–25 59.7% #11 1,815 0 6
28 2007 18–22 45.0% #52 1,666 0 6 2000 44–22 66.7% #12 1,892 0 7
29 2008 0–5 0.0% #836 1,579 0 6 2001 32–21 60.4% #19 1,786 0 8
30 2009 1–8 11.1% #590 1,533 0 6 2002 30–22 57.7% #21 1,795 0 8
31 2003 27–19 58.7% #25 1,738 0 9
32 2004 2–3 40.0% #286 1,718 0 9