H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Meghann Shaughnessy vs Amelie Cocheteux H2H: 0-1

Amelie Cocheteux holds a 1–0 lead over Meghann Shaughnessy in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Amelie Cocheteux leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Amelie Cocheteux won the 1999 Belgian Open round of 32 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Meghann Shaughnessy
USA Age 47 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Amelie Cocheteux
FRA Age 48 Left-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Amelie Cocheteux #55 6-4 6-4 Meghann Shaughnessy #66 Match data May 13, 1999* R32 Belgian Open Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Meghann Shaughnessy #1,104 #11 1,949 1,903 233 233 50.0% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Amelie Cocheteux #365 #55 552 1,583 28 53 34.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Meghann Shaughnessy Amelie Cocheteux
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1996 3–4 42.9% #165 1,511 0 0 1995 0–1 0.0% #228 1,489 0 0
18 1997 0–1 0.0% #198 1,499 0 0 1996 0–2 0.0% #166 1,468 0 0
19 1998 8–9 47.1% #69 1,544 0 0 1997 2–3 40.0% #104 1,492 0 0
20 1999 10–22 31.2% #99 1,438 0 0 1998 7–11 38.9% #81 1,529 0 0
21 2000 23–20 53.5% #38 1,651 0 1 1999 15–19 44.1% #64 1,565 0 0
22 2001 45–25 64.3% #12 1,832 0 2 2000 4–17 19.0% #180 1,463 0 0
23 2002 29–27 51.8% #30 1,738 0 2 — — — — — — —
24 2003 32–23 58.2% #17 1,729 0 3 — — — — — — —
25 2004 20–22 47.6% #40 1,662 0 3 — — — — — — —
26 2005 17–25 40.5% #66 1,566 0 3 — — — — — — —
27 2006 27–20 57.4% #37 1,709 0 5 — — — — — — —
28 2007 18–22 45.0% #52 1,666 0 6 — — — — — — —
29 2008 0–5 0.0% #836 1,579 0 6 — — — — — — —
30 2009 1–8 11.1% #590 1,533 0 6 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Meghann Shaughnessy Amelie Cocheteux
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1995 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1997 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 1998 4 5 9 44.4% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1997 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1999 2 7 9 22.2% 5 11 16 31.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1998 2 3 5 40.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2000 15 10 25 60.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1999 6 7 13 46.2% 4 8 12 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7%
22 2001 18 14 32 56.3% 15 7 22 68.2% 5 2 7 71.4% 7 2 9 77.8% 2000 3 7 10 30.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 2002 16 15 31 51.6% 6 7 13 46.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2003 26 13 39 66.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2004 14 16 30 46.7% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2005 9 15 24 37.5% 4 7 11 36.4% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2006 14 13 27 51.9% 12 6 18 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2007 7 13 20 35.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2008 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2009 1 8 9 11.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 126 133 259 48.6% 74 67 141 52.5% 20 19 39 51.3% 13 14 27 48.1% — 11 17 28 39.3% 12 23 35 34.3% 1 7 8 12.5% 4 6 10 40.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Meghann Shaughnessy Amelie Cocheteux
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1996 1512 107.9 — — — — +9 +65 — 47.1% 0.00 1–2 (33%) — — +0.72 1995 1490 99.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 0–1 — +0.07
18 1997 1499 96.7 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 — — +0.03 1996 1468 94.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.25 — — — +0.18
19 1998 1544 115.4 — — — — -48 +81 — 46.2% -0.03 3–2 (60%) 0–2 — +0.65 1997 1492 108.2 — — — — — +57 — 36.4% -1.00 1–0 0–1 — +0.11
20 1999 1439 99.7 — — — — +16 +55 +130 36.5% -0.77 3–7 (30%) 3–5 (38%) 93.7 +2.27 1998 1530 115.1 — — — — +15 +34 — 41.0% -0.72 1–2 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 97.3 +0.42
21 2000 1652 133.2 — — — — -10 -80 -108 54.2% +0.11 4–6 (40%) 7–6 (54%) 102.1 +0.56 1999 1565 110.5 — — — — +39 -57 -53 42.0% -0.90 4–3 (57%) 5–0 (100%) 107.5 +1.17
22 2001 1832 151.0 — — — — -45 -52 -141 59.9% +0.71 15–6 (71%) 15–11 (58%) 110.5 +1.29 2000 1463 103.9 — — — — +81 -6 — 28.3% -1.89 3–5 (38%) 2–2 (50%) 97.5 -0.44
23 2002 1738 139.5 — — — — +19 -30 -36 51.6% +0.17 9–9 (50%) 5–6 (45%) 94.1 +0.83 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2003 1730 144.7 +2.14 -0.89 0.995 50.1% +45 -9 — 57.6% +0.54 9–8 (53%) 7–10 (41%) 96.1 +1.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2004 1662 135.5 +1.00 -1.59 0.925 48.6% +19 +57 -22 50.0% +0.18 5–7 (42%) 5–8 (38%) 96.1 +1.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2005 1566 122.3 +4.57 -2.35 1.103 51.7% +20 +69 +81 44.8% -0.34 4–9 (31%) 7–6 (54%) 94.8 +0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2006 1709 130.5 +1.38 -2.93 0.947 48.9% -49 +14 — 55.0% +0.25 9–6 (60%) 4–1 (80%) 107.6 -1.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2007 1666 128.5 +1.99 -3.46 0.952 49.3% -76 +156 -17 47.7% -0.09 4–6 (40%) 3–6 (33%) 96.4 +0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2008 1580 93.2 -2.35 -2.24 0.773 45.3% — +131 — 14.3% -2.86 0–1 — — -0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2009 1534 114.6 -0.18 -4.49 0.730 44.3% -22 — — 23.8% -2.14 0–3 (0%) — — -0.71 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1904 137.9 +1.67 -2.91 0.933 48.8% -6 +25 -17 50.9% +0.08 66–73 (47%) 56–61 (48%) 95.9 +1.59 — 1583 110.6 — — — — +49 -5 -53 36.6% -1.18 9–11 (45%) 8–7 (53%) 100.7 +1.91

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.