H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Meghann Shaughnessy vs Asa Carlsson H2H: 2-1
Meghann Shaughnessy holds a 2–1 lead over Asa Carlsson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Meghann Shaughnessy leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Asa Carlsson leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Meghann Shaughnessy won the 2004 Sydney third round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 47
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
SWE
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2004* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Meghann Shaughnessy | 6-1 6-2 | Asa Carlsson | Match data |
| May 15, 2002* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Asa Carlsson | 6-3 6-3 | Meghann Shaughnessy | Match data |
| Aug 30, 2001* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Meghann Shaughnessy | 7-6(4) 6-3 | Asa Carlsson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meghann Shaughnessy | #1,104 | #11 | 1,949 | 1,888 | 233 | 233 | 50.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Asa Carlsson | #1,024 | #28 | 831 | 1,816 | 128 | 171 | 42.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Meghann Shaughnessy | Asa Carlsson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1996 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #165 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #198 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #164 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #69 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #70 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 10–22 | 31.2% | #99 | 1,439 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #49 | 1,748 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #38 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #39 | 1,737 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 45–25 | 64.3% | #12 | 1,825 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #45 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #30 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #92 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #17 | 1,725 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #61 | 1,662 | 0 | 1 |
| 2004 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #40 | 1,663 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #57 | 1,634 | 0 | 1 |
| 2005 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #66 | 1,563 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 6–21 | 22.2% | #102 | 1,515 | 0 | 1 |
| 2006 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #37 | 1,709 | 0 | 5 | 2002 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #78 | 1,571 | 0 | 2 |
| 2007 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #52 | 1,666 | 0 | 6 | 2003 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #345 | 1,496 | 0 | 2 |
| 2008 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #836 | 1,579 | 0 | 6 | 2004 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #207 | 1,465 | 0 | 2 |
| 2009 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #590 | 1,533 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |