H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Meghann Shaughnessy vs Conchita Martínez H2H: 2-0
Meghann Shaughnessy holds a 2–0 lead over Conchita Martínez in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Meghann Shaughnessy leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Meghann Shaughnessy won the 2002 US Open second round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 47
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 54
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 2002* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Meghann Shaughnessy | 6-3 6-2 | Conchita Martínez | Match data |
| Jan 5, 2001* | Gold Coast | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Meghann Shaughnessy | 6-2 6-1 | Conchita Martínez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meghann Shaughnessy | #1,104 | #11 | 1,949 | 1,888 | 233 | 233 | 50.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Conchita Martínez | #1,498 | #2 | 3,180 | 2,263 | 669 | 275 | 70.9% | 1 | 9 | 0 | 4 | 19 | 33 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Meghann Shaughnessy | Conchita Martínez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 14–6 | 70.0% | #41 | 1,730 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 1996 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #165 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 35–9 | 79.5% | #7 | 1,933 | 0 | 4 |
| 18 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #198 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 38–10 | 79.2% | #11 | 2,063 | 0 | 7 |
| 19 | 1998 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #69 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 36–12 | 75.0% | #9 | 2,076 | 0 | 10 |
| 20 | 1999 | 10–22 | 31.2% | #99 | 1,439 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 44–16 | 73.3% | #8 | 2,054 | 0 | 11 |
| 21 | 2000 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #38 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 66–13 | 83.5% | #4 | 2,158 | 0 | 16 |
| 22 | 2001 | 45–25 | 64.3% | #12 | 1,825 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 51–14 | 78.5% | #3 | 2,065 | 1 | 20 |
| 23 | 2002 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #30 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 57–10 | 85.1% | #2 | 2,182 | 1 | 26 |
| 24 | 2003 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #17 | 1,725 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 44–16 | 73.3% | #4 | 2,074 | 1 | 28 |
| 25 | 2004 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #40 | 1,663 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 37–19 | 66.1% | #12 | 2,011 | 1 | 28 |
| 26 | 2005 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #66 | 1,563 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #8 | 1,968 | 1 | 30 |
| 27 | 2006 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #37 | 1,709 | 0 | 5 | 1999 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #15 | 1,898 | 1 | 31 |
| 28 | 2007 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #52 | 1,666 | 0 | 6 | 2000 | 48–19 | 71.6% | #5 | 1,951 | 1 | 32 |
| 29 | 2008 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #836 | 1,579 | 0 | 6 | 2001 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #35 | 1,852 | 1 | 32 |
| 30 | 2009 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #590 | 1,533 | 0 | 6 | 2002 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #34 | 1,756 | 1 | 32 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #18 | 1,756 | 1 | 32 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #42 | 1,772 | 1 | 32 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #31 | 1,812 | 1 | 33 |