H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Meghann Shaughnessy vs Daja Bedanova H2H: 3-2

Meghann Shaughnessy holds a 3–2 lead over Daja Bedanova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Meghann Shaughnessy leads 3–1 on hard courts, while Daja Bedanova leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Meghann Shaughnessy won the 2003 Scottsdale third round 6-2 6-3.

USA Age 47 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3 2
5 main draw meetings
CZE Age 43 Right-Handed 171 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 27, 2003* Scottsdale WTA 500 R32 Hard Meghann Shaughnessy #27 6-2 6-3 Daja Bedanova #44 Match data
Jun 22, 2002* Eastbourne WTA 500 QF Grass Daja Bedanova #28 7-6(6) 6-2 Meghann Shaughnessy #15 Match data
Sep 2, 2001* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Daja Bedanova #37 6-4 6-1 Meghann Shaughnessy #12 Match data
Aug 13, 2001 Toronto WTA 1000 R16 Hard Meghann Shaughnessy #14 6-4 6-4 Daja Bedanova #45 Match data
Jul 26, 2001* Stanford WTA 500 R32 Hard Meghann Shaughnessy #15 7-5 7-6(4) Daja Bedanova #43 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Meghann Shaughnessy #1,104 #11 1,949 1,888 233 233 50.0% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Daja Bedanova #998 #16 1,323 1,801 64 71 47.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Meghann Shaughnessy Daja Bedanova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1999 1–1 50.0% #295 1,522 0 0
17 1996 3–4 42.9% #165 1,512 0 0 2000 12–8 60.0% #53 1,688 0 1
18 1997 0–1 0.0% #198 1,499 0 0 2001 20–20 50.0% #28 1,768 0 1
19 1998 8–9 47.1% #69 1,544 0 0 2002 24–25 49.0% #37 1,712 0 1
20 1999 10–22 31.2% #99 1,439 0 0 2003 6–15 28.6% #155 1,594 0 1
21 2000 23–20 53.5% #38 1,652 0 1
22 2001 45–25 64.3% #12 1,825 0 2 2005 1–2 33.3% #295 1,596 0 1
23 2002 29–27 51.8% #30 1,716 0 2
24 2003 32–23 58.2% #17 1,725 0 3
25 2004 20–22 47.6% #40 1,663 0 3
26 2005 17–25 40.5% #66 1,563 0 3
27 2006 27–20 57.4% #37 1,709 0 5
28 2007 18–22 45.0% #52 1,666 0 6
29 2008 0–5 0.0% #836 1,579 0 6
30 2009 1–8 11.1% #590 1,533 0 6