H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Meghann Shaughnessy vs Daja Bedanova H2H: 3-2

Meghann Shaughnessy holds a 3–2 lead over Daja Bedanova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Meghann Shaughnessy leads 3–1 on hard courts, while Daja Bedanova leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Meghann Shaughnessy won the 2003 Scottsdale round of 32 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Meghann Shaughnessy
USA Age 47 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main-draw meetings
Daja Bedanova
CZE Age 43 Right-Handed 171 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Meghann Shaughnessy #27 6-2 6-3 Daja Bedanova #44 Match data Feb 27, 2003* R32 Scottsdale Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Daja Bedanova #28 7-6(6) 6-2 Meghann Shaughnessy #15 Match data Jun 22, 2002* QF Eastbourne Open Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Grass
Daja Bedanova #37 6-4 6-1 Meghann Shaughnessy #12 Match data Sep 2, 2001* R32 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Meghann Shaughnessy #14 6-4 6-4 Daja Bedanova #45 Match data Aug 17, 2001* R16 Canadian Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Meghann Shaughnessy #15 7-5 7-6(4) Daja Bedanova #43 Match data Jul 26, 2001* R32 Stanford Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Meghann Shaughnessy #1,104 #11 1,949 1,903 233 233 50.0% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Daja Bedanova #998 #16 1,323 1,806 65 72 47.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Meghann Shaughnessy Daja Bedanova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1999 1–1 50.0% #295 1,522 0 0
17 1996 3–4 42.9% #165 1,511 0 0 2000 13–9 59.1% #53 1,698 0 1
18 1997 0–1 0.0% #198 1,499 0 0 2001 20–20 50.0% #28 1,772 0 1
19 1998 8–9 47.1% #69 1,544 0 0 2002 24–25 49.0% #37 1,718 0 1
20 1999 10–22 31.2% #99 1,438 0 0 2003 6–15 28.6% #155 1,597 0 1
21 2000 23–20 53.5% #38 1,651 0 1 — — — — — — —
22 2001 45–25 64.3% #12 1,832 0 2 2005 1–2 33.3% #295 1,600 0 1
23 2002 29–27 51.8% #30 1,738 0 2 — — — — — — —
24 2003 32–23 58.2% #17 1,729 0 3 — — — — — — —
25 2004 20–22 47.6% #40 1,662 0 3 — — — — — — —
26 2005 17–25 40.5% #66 1,566 0 3 — — — — — — —
27 2006 27–20 57.4% #37 1,709 0 5 — — — — — — —
28 2007 18–22 45.0% #52 1,666 0 6 — — — — — — —
29 2008 0–5 0.0% #836 1,579 0 6 — — — — — — —
30 2009 1–8 11.1% #590 1,533 0 6 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Meghann Shaughnessy Daja Bedanova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 — — — — — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
17 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 2000 12 7 19 63.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
18 1997 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 16 13 29 55.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
19 1998 4 5 9 44.4% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2002 13 14 27 48.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 7 3 10 70.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
20 1999 2 7 9 22.2% 5 11 16 31.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2003 3 6 9 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
21 2000 15 10 25 60.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2001 18 14 32 56.3% 15 7 22 68.2% 5 2 7 71.4% 7 2 9 77.8% 2005 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2002 16 15 31 51.6% 6 7 13 46.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2003 26 13 39 66.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2004 14 16 30 46.7% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2005 9 15 24 37.5% 4 7 11 36.4% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2006 14 13 27 51.9% 12 6 18 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2007 7 13 20 35.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2008 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2009 1 8 9 11.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 126 133 259 48.6% 74 67 141 52.5% 20 19 39 51.3% 13 14 27 48.1% — 45 41 86 52.3% 7 12 19 36.8% 8 9 17 47.1% 5 10 15 33.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Meghann Shaughnessy Daja Bedanova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1522 117.6 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.50 — — — -0.06
17 1996 1512 107.9 — — — — +9 +65 — 47.1% 0.00 1–2 (33%) — — +0.72 2000 1698 131.5 — — — — +23 — — 51.9% +0.15 8–2 (80%) 2–1 (67%) 110.6 +0.15
18 1997 1499 96.7 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 — — +0.03 2001 1772 151.8 — — — — +15 -200 -253 50.5% +0.27 9–8 (53%) 3–11 (21%) 96.7 -2.29
19 1998 1544 115.4 — — — — -48 +81 — 46.2% -0.03 3–2 (60%) 0–2 — +0.65 2002 1718 137.2 — — — — -23 -139 -7 49.1% -0.08 10–10 (50%) 6–6 (50%) 98.1 -0.10
20 1999 1439 99.7 — — — — +16 +55 +130 36.5% -0.77 3–7 (30%) 3–5 (38%) 93.7 +2.27 2003 1597 114.3 -0.44 -1.19 0.806 45.7% +21 -39 +82 33.3% -1.21 2–4 (33%) 0–2 — -0.74
21 2000 1652 133.2 — — — — -10 -80 -108 54.2% +0.11 4–6 (40%) 7–6 (54%) 102.1 +0.56 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2001 1832 151.0 — — — — -45 -52 -141 59.9% +0.71 15–6 (71%) 15–11 (58%) 110.5 +1.29 2005 1600 108.4 — — — — — — — 37.5% -1.50 1–1 1–0 — -0.49
23 2002 1738 139.5 — — — — +19 -30 -36 51.6% +0.17 9–9 (50%) 5–6 (45%) 94.1 +0.83 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2003 1730 144.7 +2.14 -0.89 0.995 50.1% +45 -9 — 57.6% +0.54 9–8 (53%) 7–10 (41%) 96.1 +1.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2004 1662 135.5 +1.00 -1.59 0.925 48.6% +19 +57 -22 50.0% +0.18 5–7 (42%) 5–8 (38%) 96.1 +1.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2005 1566 122.3 +4.57 -2.35 1.103 51.7% +20 +69 +81 44.8% -0.34 4–9 (31%) 7–6 (54%) 94.8 +0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2006 1709 130.5 +1.38 -2.93 0.947 48.9% -49 +14 — 55.0% +0.25 9–6 (60%) 4–1 (80%) 107.6 -1.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2007 1666 128.5 +1.99 -3.46 0.952 49.3% -76 +156 -17 47.7% -0.09 4–6 (40%) 3–6 (33%) 96.4 +0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2008 1580 93.2 -2.35 -2.24 0.773 45.3% — +131 — 14.3% -2.86 0–1 — — -0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2009 1534 114.6 -0.18 -4.49 0.730 44.3% -22 — — 23.8% -2.14 0–3 (0%) — — -0.71 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1904 137.9 +1.67 -2.91 0.933 48.8% -6 +25 -17 50.9% +0.08 66–73 (47%) 56–61 (48%) 95.9 +1.59 — 1807 141.8 -0.44 -1.19 0.806 45.7% +4 -107 -36 47.3% -0.15 30–25 (55%) 12–20 (38%) 100.2 -2.60

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.