H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Meghann Shaughnessy vs Janette Husarova H2H: 2-1

Meghann Shaughnessy holds a 2–1 lead over Janette Husarova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Meghann Shaughnessy leads 2–0 on clay, while Janette Husarova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Janette Husarova won the 2002 Los Angeles third round 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Meghann Shaughnessy
USA Age 47 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Janette Husarova
SVK Age 52 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 7, 2002* Los Angeles WTA 500 R32 Hard Janette Husarova #40 6-4 6-4 Meghann Shaughnessy #26 Match data
Jun 3, 2001* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Meghann Shaughnessy #20 7-5 6-4 Janette Husarova #80 Match data
May 9, 1996* Budapest WTA 250 R32 Clay Meghann Shaughnessy #265 6-4 6-1 Janette Husarova #89 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Meghann Shaughnessy #1,104 #11 1,949 1,888 233 233 50.0% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Janette Husarova #1,055 #31 1,006 1,737 79 109 42.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Meghann Shaughnessy Janette Husarova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1996 3–4 42.9% #165 1,512 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1997 0–1 0.0% #198 1,499 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1998 8–9 47.1% #69 1,544 0 0 1993 3–1 75.0% #82 1,547 0 0
20 1999 10–22 31.2% #99 1,439 0 0 1994 6–13 31.6% #145 1,507 0 0
21 2000 23–20 53.5% #38 1,652 0 1 1995 1–5 16.7% #102 1,477 0 0
22 2001 45–25 64.3% #12 1,825 0 2 1996 12–14 46.2% #76 1,545 0 0
23 2002 29–27 51.8% #30 1,716 0 2 1997 1–2 33.3% #375 1,542 0 0
24 2003 32–23 58.2% #17 1,725 0 3 1998 5–9 35.7% #127 1,526 0 0
25 2004 20–22 47.6% #40 1,663 0 3 1999 0–3 0.0% #216 1,503 0 0
26 2005 17–25 40.5% #66 1,563 0 3 2000 3–5 37.5% #149 1,492 0 0
27 2006 27–20 57.4% #37 1,709 0 5 2001 10–15 40.0% #72 1,527 0 0
28 2007 18–22 45.0% #52 1,666 0 6 2002 28–24 53.8% #33 1,717 0 0
29 2008 0–5 0.0% #836 1,579 0 6 2003 7–16 30.4% #126 1,578 0 0
30 2009 1–8 11.1% #590 1,533 0 6 2004 1–1 50.0% #205 1,589 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2005 2–1 66.7% #366 1,604 0 0