H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Meghann Shaughnessy vs Kristina Brandi H2H: 2-2
Meghann Shaughnessy and Kristina Brandi are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Meghann Shaughnessy leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Kristina Brandi won the 2004 Miami second round 7-5 4-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 47
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
PUR
Age 49
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 2004* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Kristina Brandi | 7-5 4-6 7-5 | Meghann Shaughnessy | Match data |
| Mar 13, 2004* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Meghann Shaughnessy | 6-4 6-4 | Kristina Brandi | Match data |
| May 3, 2001* | Hamburg | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Meghann Shaughnessy | 6-2 6-2 | Kristina Brandi | Match data |
| Jun 14, 1999 | S Hertogenbosch | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Kristina Brandi | 6-1 6-4 | Meghann Shaughnessy | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meghann Shaughnessy | #1,104 | #11 | 1,949 | 1,888 | 233 | 233 | 50.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Kristina Brandi | #917 | #27 | 983 | 1,722 | 103 | 150 | 40.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Meghann Shaughnessy | Kristina Brandi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1996 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #165 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #198 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1998 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #69 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #156 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1999 | 10–22 | 31.2% | #99 | 1,439 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #88 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2000 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #38 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #71 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2001 | 45–25 | 64.3% | #12 | 1,825 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #55 | 1,605 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2002 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #30 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #27 | 1,643 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2003 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #17 | 1,725 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #77 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2004 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #40 | 1,663 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #207 | 1,548 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2005 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #66 | 1,563 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #75 | 1,535 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2006 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #37 | 1,709 | 0 | 5 | 2004 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #47 | 1,611 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2007 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #52 | 1,666 | 0 | 6 | 2005 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #89 | 1,517 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2008 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #836 | 1,579 | 0 | 6 | 2006 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #158 | 1,426 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2009 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #590 | 1,533 | 0 | 6 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #199 | 1,414 | 0 | 1 |