H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Meghann Shaughnessy vs Marlene Weingartner H2H: 2-3

Marlene Weingartner holds a 3–2 lead over Meghann Shaughnessy in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Marlene Weingartner leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Meghann Shaughnessy won the 2002 Sarasota fourth round 6-2 6-3.

USA Age 47 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 3
5 main draw meetings
GER Age 46 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 5, 2002* Sarasota WTA 250 R16 Clay Meghann Shaughnessy #13 6-2 6-3 Marlene Weingartner #46 Match data
Jan 20, 2002* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Marlene Weingartner #48 6-2 3-6 6-3 Meghann Shaughnessy #12 Match data
Apr 19, 2001* Charleston WTA 1000 R32 Clay Marlene Weingartner #63 6-2 6-2 Meghann Shaughnessy #22 Match data
Feb 11, 1999* Prostejov WTA 250 R32 Carpet Meghann Shaughnessy #77 5-7 6-4 6-3 Marlene Weingartner #111 Match data
Sep 2, 1998* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Marlene Weingartner #153 6-4 1-6 6-2 Meghann Shaughnessy #81 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Meghann Shaughnessy #1,104 #11 1,949 1,888 233 233 50.0% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Marlene Weingartner #1,051 #36 808 1,677 84 134 38.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Meghann Shaughnessy Marlene Weingartner
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1995 1–4 20.0% #231 1,480 0 0
16 1996 0–1 0.0% #211 1,471 0 0
17 1996 3–4 42.9% #165 1,512 0 0 1997 3–7 30.0% #127 1,467 0 0
18 1997 0–1 0.0% #198 1,499 0 0 1998 4–4 50.0% #104 1,511 0 0
19 1998 8–9 47.1% #69 1,544 0 0 1999 7–14 33.3% #92 1,533 0 0
20 1999 10–22 31.2% #99 1,439 0 0 2000 6–15 28.6% #87 1,494 0 0
21 2000 23–20 53.5% #38 1,652 0 1 2001 21–26 44.7% #42 1,545 0 0
22 2001 45–25 64.3% #12 1,825 0 2 2002 9–20 31.0% #97 1,483 0 0
23 2002 29–27 51.8% #30 1,716 0 2 2003 17–15 53.1% #47 1,664 0 0
24 2003 32–23 58.2% #17 1,725 0 3 2004 13–17 43.3% #71 1,628 0 0
25 2004 20–22 47.6% #40 1,663 0 3 2005 3–11 21.4% #381 1,507 0 0
26 2005 17–25 40.5% #66 1,563 0 3
27 2006 27–20 57.4% #37 1,709 0 5
28 2007 18–22 45.0% #52 1,666 0 6
29 2008 0–5 0.0% #836 1,579 0 6
30 2009 1–8 11.1% #590 1,533 0 6