H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC

Meghann Shaughnessy vs Meilen Tu H2H: 3-2

Meghann Shaughnessy holds a 3–2 lead over Meilen Tu in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Meilen Tu leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Meghann Shaughnessy leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Meilen Tu won the 2007 Stanford third round 7-6(3) 6-1.

USA Age 47 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3 2
5 main draw meetings
USA Age 48 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 26, 2007* Stanford WTA 500 R32 Hard Meilen Tu #42 7-6(3) 6-1 Meghann Shaughnessy #40 Match data
Aug 1, 2002* San Diego WTA 500 R32 Hard Meghann Shaughnessy #25 6-1 6-2 Meilen Tu #48 Match data
May 31, 2001* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Meghann Shaughnessy #20 3-6 6-1 6-1 Meilen Tu #40 Match data
Apr 13, 2001* Amelia Island WTA 500 R16 Clay Meghann Shaughnessy #26 4-6 7-5 6-0 Meilen Tu #45 Match data
Apr 15, 1999* Tokyo WTA 500 R32 Hard Meilen Tu #138 6-3 7-5 Meghann Shaughnessy #68 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Meghann Shaughnessy #1,104 #11 1,949 1,888 233 233 50.0% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Meilen Tu #1,136 #35 769 1,692 103 163 38.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Meghann Shaughnessy Meilen Tu
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1994 2–3 40.0% #160 1,542 0 0
17 1996 3–4 42.9% #165 1,512 0 0 1995 3–10 23.1% #161 1,506 0 0
18 1997 0–1 0.0% #198 1,499 0 0 1996 2–3 40.0% #157 1,518 0 0
19 1998 8–9 47.1% #69 1,544 0 0 1997 6–13 31.6% #81 1,519 0 0
20 1999 10–22 31.2% #99 1,439 0 0 1998 2–3 40.0% #209 1,533 0 0
21 2000 23–20 53.5% #38 1,652 0 1 1999 3–11 21.4% #103 1,485 0 0
22 2001 45–25 64.3% #12 1,825 0 2 2000 6–9 40.0% #67 1,576 0 0
23 2002 29–27 51.8% #30 1,716 0 2 2001 25–23 52.1% #45 1,615 0 1
24 2003 32–23 58.2% #17 1,725 0 3 2002 16–24 40.0% #73 1,561 0 1
25 2004 20–22 47.6% #40 1,663 0 3 2003 4–14 22.2% #143 1,478 0 1
26 2005 17–25 40.5% #66 1,563 0 3 2004 2–4 33.3% #162 1,464 0 1
27 2006 27–20 57.4% #37 1,709 0 5 2005 4–9 30.8% #120 1,474 0 1
28 2007 18–22 45.0% #52 1,666 0 6 2006 7–9 43.8% #90 1,532 0 1
29 2008 0–5 0.0% #836 1,579 0 6 2007 20–22 47.6% #47 1,625 0 1
30 2009 1–8 11.1% #590 1,533 0 6 2008 1–6 14.3% #630 1,546 0 1