H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Meghann Shaughnessy vs Miriam Oremans H2H: 0-1

Miriam Oremans holds a 1–0 lead over Meghann Shaughnessy in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Miriam Oremans leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Miriam Oremans won the 2002 Wimbledon round of 64 7-5 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Meghann Shaughnessy
USA Age 47 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Miriam Oremans
NED Age 54 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Miriam Oremans #129 7-5 6-3 Meghann Shaughnessy #16 Match data Jun 28, 2002* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Meghann Shaughnessy #1,104 #11 1,949 1,903 233 233 50.0% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Miriam Oremans #193 #25 585 1,808 162 182 47.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Meghann Shaughnessy Miriam Oremans
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1996 3–4 42.9% #165 1,511 0 0 1990 1–1 50.0% #185 1,519 0 0
18 1997 0–1 0.0% #198 1,499 0 0 1991 3–9 25.0% #149 1,472 0 0
19 1998 8–9 47.1% #69 1,544 0 0 1992 8–12 40.0% #130 1,531 0 0
20 1999 10–22 31.2% #99 1,438 0 0 1993 28–20 58.3% #31 1,746 0 0
21 2000 23–20 53.5% #38 1,651 0 1 1994 14–18 43.8% #48 1,733 0 0
22 2001 45–25 64.3% #12 1,832 0 2 1995 19–18 51.4% #42 1,768 0 0
23 2002 29–27 51.8% #30 1,738 0 2 1996 17–18 48.6% #46 1,714 0 0
24 2003 32–23 58.2% #17 1,729 0 3 1997 15–15 50.0% #46 1,773 0 0
25 2004 20–22 47.6% #40 1,662 0 3 1998 13–16 44.8% #57 1,728 0 0
26 2005 17–25 40.5% #66 1,566 0 3 1999 8–17 32.0% #98 1,627 0 0
27 2006 27–20 57.4% #37 1,709 0 5 2000 17–13 56.7% #64 1,711 0 0
28 2007 18–22 45.0% #52 1,666 0 6 2001 13–15 46.4% #84 1,690 0 0
29 2008 0–5 0.0% #836 1,579 0 6 2002 6–10 37.5% #124 1,613 0 0
30 2009 1–8 11.1% #590 1,533 0 6 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Meghann Shaughnessy Miriam Oremans
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1990 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1997 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
19 1998 4 5 9 44.4% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 6 6 12 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3%
20 1999 2 7 9 22.2% 5 11 16 31.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1993 16 14 30 53.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
21 2000 15 10 25 60.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 5 9 14 35.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 2 5 60.0%
22 2001 18 14 32 56.3% 15 7 22 68.2% 5 2 7 71.4% 7 2 9 77.8% 1995 7 8 15 46.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0%
23 2002 16 15 31 51.6% 6 7 13 46.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1996 2 6 8 25.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9%
24 2003 26 13 39 66.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1997 3 5 8 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 3 8 62.5%
25 2004 14 16 30 46.7% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1998 1 6 7 14.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
26 2005 9 15 24 37.5% 4 7 11 36.4% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1999 2 7 9 22.2% 0 5 5 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0%
27 2006 14 13 27 51.9% 12 6 18 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2000 10 6 16 62.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
28 2007 7 13 20 35.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2001 5 8 13 38.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
29 2008 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2002 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
30 2009 1 8 9 11.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 126 133 259 48.6% 74 67 141 52.5% 20 19 39 51.3% 13 14 27 48.1% — 61 85 146 41.8% 28 43 71 39.4% 53 33 86 61.6% 20 21 41 48.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Meghann Shaughnessy Miriam Oremans
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1996 1512 107.9 — — — — +9 +65 — 47.1% 0.00 1–2 (33%) — — +0.72 1990 1520 110.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.60 1–0 — — -0.11
18 1997 1499 96.7 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 — — +0.03 1991 1472 101.8 — — — — +51 +51 — 29.6% -1.00 1–2 (33%) — — +0.66
19 1998 1544 115.4 — — — — -48 +81 — 46.2% -0.03 3–2 (60%) 0–2 — +0.65 1992 1532 111.4 — — — — +48 — -24 38.6% -0.80 3–1 (75%) 0–1 — +0.45
20 1999 1439 99.7 — — — — +16 +55 +130 36.5% -0.77 3–7 (30%) 3–5 (38%) 93.7 +2.27 1993 1747 146.5 — — — — -74 -220 +26 59.1% +0.56 7–14 (33%) 4–6 (40%) 97.4 +0.65
21 2000 1652 133.2 — — — — -10 -80 -108 54.2% +0.11 4–6 (40%) 7–6 (54%) 102.1 +0.56 1994 1733 131.3 — — — — -44 -192 +24 46.8% -0.26 5–8 (38%) 5–7 (42%) 96.7 +0.41
22 2001 1832 151.0 — — — — -45 -52 -141 59.9% +0.71 15–6 (71%) 15–11 (58%) 110.5 +1.29 1995 1769 143.9 — — — — -10 -170 -22 50.0% +0.10 6–4 (60%) 6–7 (46%) 104.5 -0.91
23 2002 1738 139.5 — — — — +19 -30 -36 51.6% +0.17 9–9 (50%) 5–6 (45%) 94.1 +0.83 1996 1714 134.9 — — — — -34 -67 +161 48.1% +0.09 5–4 (56%) 4–5 (44%) 100.2 +0.41
24 2003 1730 144.7 +2.14 -0.89 0.995 50.1% +45 -9 — 57.6% +0.54 9–8 (53%) 7–10 (41%) 96.1 +1.17 1997 1774 137.0 — — — — -31 -189 +117 47.9% +0.10 8–7 (53%) 2–7 (22%) 99.3 -1.65
25 2004 1662 135.5 +1.00 -1.59 0.925 48.6% +19 +57 -22 50.0% +0.18 5–7 (42%) 5–8 (38%) 96.1 +1.24 1998 1728 120.1 — — — — -72 -132 +210 41.5% -0.65 6–1 (86%) 5–7 (42%) 102.7 -0.25
26 2005 1566 122.3 +4.57 -2.35 1.103 51.7% +20 +69 +81 44.8% -0.34 4–9 (31%) 7–6 (54%) 94.8 +0.33 1999 1628 117.1 — — — — -17 -126 +239 34.0% -1.19 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -1.78
27 2006 1709 130.5 +1.38 -2.93 0.947 48.9% -49 +14 — 55.0% +0.25 9–6 (60%) 4–1 (80%) 107.6 -1.20 2000 1711 126.6 — — — — -8 -186 +166 53.5% +0.13 7–4 (64%) 4–3 (57%) 103.0 +0.23
28 2007 1666 128.5 +1.99 -3.46 0.952 49.3% -76 +156 -17 47.7% -0.09 4–6 (40%) 3–6 (33%) 96.4 +0.26 2001 1690 122.8 — — — — -15 -187 +242 43.3% -0.55 8–3 (73%) 3–3 (50%) 101.2 -1.04
29 2008 1580 93.2 -2.35 -2.24 0.773 45.3% — +131 — 14.3% -2.86 0–1 — — -0.09 2002 1613 100.3 — — — — -1 -157 +280 40.0% -0.60 1–2 (33%) 0–4 (0%) 93.7 +0.42
30 2009 1534 114.6 -0.18 -4.49 0.730 44.3% -22 — — 23.8% -2.14 0–3 (0%) — — -0.71 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1904 137.9 +1.67 -2.91 0.933 48.8% -6 +25 -17 50.9% +0.08 66–73 (47%) 56–61 (48%) 95.9 +1.59 — 1808 135.6 — — — — -26 -145 +138 46.8% -0.19 59–52 (53%) 34–51 (40%) 97.2 -0.73

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.