H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Meghann Shaughnessy vs Monica Seles H2H: 1-2

Monica Seles holds a 2–1 lead over Meghann Shaughnessy in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Monica Seles leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Monica Seles won the 2001 San Diego fourth round 6-4 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Meghann Shaughnessy
USA Age 47 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Monica Seles
USA Age 52 Left-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 3, 2001* San Diego WTA 500 R16 Hard Monica Seles #10 6-4 6-1 Meghann Shaughnessy #14 Match data
Mar 3, 2001* Scottsdale WTA 500 SF Hard Meghann Shaughnessy #27 3-6 7-6(5) 6-2 Monica Seles #4 Match data
Jul 28, 2000* Stanford WTA 500 R16 Hard Monica Seles #5 7-5 6-3 Meghann Shaughnessy #54 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Meghann Shaughnessy #1,104 #11 1,949 1,888 233 233 50.0% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Monica Seles #223 #1 4,056 2,540 578 121 82.7% 9 12 3 7 22 53

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Meghann Shaughnessy Monica Seles
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1988 5–3 62.5% #86 1,600 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1989 33–9 78.6% #6 2,002 0 1
16 — — — — — — — 1990 55–6 90.2% #2 2,295 1 10
17 1996 3–4 42.9% #165 1,512 0 0 1991 74–6 92.5% #1 2,443 4 20
18 1997 0–1 0.0% #198 1,499 0 0 1992 70–5 93.3% #1 2,499 7 30
19 1998 8–9 47.1% #69 1,544 0 0 1993 17–2 89.5% #8 2,485 8 32
20 1999 10–22 31.2% #99 1,439 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2000 23–20 53.5% #38 1,652 0 1 1995 11–1 91.7% #1 2,487 8 33
22 2001 45–25 64.3% #12 1,825 0 2 1996 43–8 84.3% #2 2,342 9 38
23 2002 29–27 51.8% #30 1,716 0 2 1997 45–14 76.3% #5 2,159 9 41
24 2003 32–23 58.2% #17 1,725 0 3 1998 42–13 76.4% #6 2,174 9 43
25 2004 20–22 47.6% #40 1,663 0 3 1999 36–12 75.0% #6 2,116 9 44
26 2005 17–25 40.5% #66 1,563 0 3 2000 51–12 81.0% #4 2,144 9 47
27 2006 27–20 57.4% #37 1,709 0 5 2001 40–10 80.0% #10 2,127 9 51
28 2007 18–22 45.0% #52 1,666 0 6 2002 46–13 78.0% #7 2,088 9 53
29 2008 0–5 0.0% #836 1,579 0 6 2003 10–7 58.8% #60 1,993 9 53
30 2009 1–8 11.1% #590 1,533 0 6 — — — — — — —