H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Meghann Shaughnessy vs Nicole Pratt H2H: 4-4

Meghann Shaughnessy and Nicole Pratt are tied 4–4 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Meghann Shaughnessy leads 4–3 on hard courts, while Nicole Pratt leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Nicole Pratt won the 2007 Tokyo third round 6-7(4) 6-1 6-4.

USA Age 47 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
4 4
8 main draw meetings
AUS Age 53 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 1, 2007* Tokyo WTA 1000 R32 Carpet Nicole Pratt #65 6-7(4) 6-1 6-4 Meghann Shaughnessy #40 Match data
Jan 21, 2004* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Nicole Pratt #52 6-4 5-7 6-4 Meghann Shaughnessy #20 Match data
Mar 9, 2002* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R32 Hard Meghann Shaughnessy #13 6-4 6-1 Nicole Pratt #38 Match data
Jul 27, 2001* Stanford WTA 500 R16 Hard Meghann Shaughnessy #15 6-2 6-2 Nicole Pratt #78 Match data
Mar 23, 2001* Miami WTA 1000 R64 Hard Nicole Pratt #65 6-4 2-6 6-2 Meghann Shaughnessy #24 Match data
Mar 19, 1999* Key Biscayne WTA 1000 R128 Hard Meghann Shaughnessy #68 7-6 6-2 Nicole Pratt #80 Match data
Feb 25, 1999* Oklahoma WTA 250 R32 Hard Nicole Pratt #84 6-3 7-6 Meghann Shaughnessy #69 Match data
Aug 13, 1998* Boston WTA 250 R32 Hard Meghann Shaughnessy #84 6-2 6-0 Nicole Pratt #99 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Meghann Shaughnessy #1,104 #11 1,949 1,888 233 233 50.0% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Nicole Pratt #1,043 #35 924 1,764 156 217 41.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Meghann Shaughnessy Nicole Pratt
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1996 3–4 42.9% #165 1,512 0 0 1990 1–1 50.0% #201 1,497 0 0
18 1997 0–1 0.0% #198 1,499 0 0 1991 1–7 12.5% #201 1,469 0 0
19 1998 8–9 47.1% #69 1,544 0 0 1992 3–3 50.0% #203 1,491 0 0
20 1999 10–22 31.2% #99 1,439 0 0 1993 2–5 28.6% #172 1,486 0 0
21 2000 23–20 53.5% #38 1,652 0 1 1994 2–5 28.6% #224 1,465 0 0
22 2001 45–25 64.3% #12 1,825 0 2 1995 0–2 0.0% #214 1,451 0 0
23 2002 29–27 51.8% #30 1,716 0 2 1996 0–2 0.0% #194 1,434 0 0
24 2003 32–23 58.2% #17 1,725 0 3 1997 5–4 55.6% #110 1,494 0 0
25 2004 20–22 47.6% #40 1,663 0 3 1998 4–13 23.5% #113 1,464 0 0
26 2005 17–25 40.5% #66 1,563 0 3 1999 15–17 46.9% #56 1,598 0 0
27 2006 27–20 57.4% #37 1,709 0 5 2000 16–23 41.0% #54 1,621 0 0
28 2007 18–22 45.0% #52 1,666 0 6 2001 22–23 48.9% #51 1,704 0 0
29 2008 0–5 0.0% #836 1,579 0 6 2002 23–20 53.5% #48 1,719 0 0
30 2009 1–8 11.1% #590 1,533 0 6 2003 17–23 42.5% #53 1,646 0 0
31 2004 19–21 47.5% #50 1,604 0 1
32 2005 8–17 32.0% #126 1,544 0 1
33 2006 8–12 40.0% #77 1,546 0 1
34 2007 10–16 38.5% #70 1,566 0 1
35 2008 0–3 0.0% #1043 1,545 0 1